Multi-site study of speech perception training for hearing-aid users
Principal Investigator: Charles S Watson
Abstract: DESCRIPTION (provided by applicant): Between 25 and 35% of the adults in the US who could benefit from hearing aids, as many as 25,000,000 persons, either refuse to consider those devices or reject them after a trial. Many of those who try to use hearing aids decide that they are not able to understand speech well enough with them to justify their cost. While developments in hearing-aid technology have improved this situation, recent research suggests another answer. It is that speech perception training may improve recognition abilities to the point that otherwise unsuccessful hearing-aid users can become successful. Several research groups, including our own, have reported statistically significant improvements in speech recognition as a result of various types of training. But none have answered three vital questions. (1) How great an improvement in speech recognition can be achieved through prolonged systematic training? (2) How many hours of training are required to approach that limit? (3) What are the optimal training materials for successful speech recognition training: spoken phrases and sentences, the constituent parts of speech, or both speech parts and wholes? The proposed project, conducted at six major centers for auditory research and clinical service, will address these questions through an intensive speech perception training study of hearing-aid users. Training will be done using the Speech Perception Assessment and Training System (SPATS), which has been developed and tested over the past eight years. SPATS combines the training of over 100 of the most common syllable constituents of spoken English (onsets, nuclei and codas) with training on the recognition of meaningful sentences. Clinical trials with both hearing-aid and cochlear-implant users have shown improved post-training scores on speech recognition tests, following 12 to 24 hours of SPATS training, similar to results reported for other systems. Those data, together with evidence from non-speech auditory training research, suggest that clinically important gains would be made if the training continued for a total of 30-40 hours. While this amount of training may be considered an impossible demand to make of hearing-impaired persons, it is less forbidding when compared to the time devoted to learning many other skills. In 30- 40 hours a piano student can play a few scales and may have mastered her first elementary piece using two hands, an amputee who will eventually become a skier has managed to walk across a room, and a foreign-language student has learned to read a very simple story, slowly. Speech perception training for hearing-aid users should not be rejected out of hand because 30-40 hours of training does not fit the model of current clinical practice. If major improvements in speech reception by the hearing-aid user can be shown to be achievable through such training, many users would elect to make that effort and be willing to pay for it. PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: Approximately twenty-five million US citizens with hearing impairment have either tried a hearing aid and decided against using it, or have not tried one because they do not believe it would help them enough to justify the cost. Recent research suggests that extended speech perception training can turn some unsuccessful hearing-aid users into successful ones. To test this hypothesis, extended speech perception training of hearing aid users will be undertaken for the first time, at each of six major centers for research and treatment of hearing disorders.
Funding Period: 2010-08-01 - 2016-07-31
more information: NIH RePORT
- CORE CENTERHARRY STEVEN COLBURN; Fiscal Year: 2013..These cores and the support they provide are designed specifically to use resources efficiently, to promote collaboration, and to develop resources of general use to the hearing research community. ..
- Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Robust Speech CodingMichael G Heinz; Fiscal Year: 2013..This knowledge will benefit the development of diagnostic and rehabilitative strategies to improve the daily lives of people with hearing loss. ..
- Realistic Hearing-Aid Outcome MeasuresHARRY NMI LEVITT; Fiscal Year: 2013..Knowing what to expect is an important consideration and would reduce substantially the dissatisfaction that occurs when the hearing aid does not meet expectations. ..
- Iowa Cochlear Implant Clinical Research Center Project VIBruce Jay Gantz; Fiscal Year: 2013..The five research projects are highly integrated and depend on data from each other to answer the experimental questions. ..
- Early Development of Children With Hearing LossSusan Nittrouer; Fiscal Year: 2013....
- Nonlinear dynamics of complex sound processing in auditory cortexBRIAN MALONE; Fiscal Year: 2013....
- Predicting the benefits of spatial and spectrotemporal cuesFrederick J Gallun; Fiscal Year: 2013....
- Electrically-evoked neural responses in children with auditory neuropathyShuman He; Fiscal Year: 2013..Therefore, this project has tremendous translational significance. ..
- AUDITORY TRAINING AND TALKER VARIABILITYNANCY ANN TYE-MURRAY; Fiscal Year: 2013....
- Outcomes in Children with Developmental Delay and Deafness: a Randomized TrialJohn S Oghalai; Fiscal Year: 2013..PUBLIC HEALTH RELEVANCE: This research is relevant to human health because it will provide evidence to answer the question of whether to treat a deaf child with mental retardation with a cochlear implant or hearing aids. ..
- Aging and speech perception in complex listening environmentsKaren S Helfer; Fiscal Year: 2013..This, in turn, may drive improvements in rehabilitative protocols that incorporate treatment of both bottom-up and top-down contributors to age-related speech understanding problems. ..