David C Byrne

Summary

Affiliation: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Country: USA

Publications

  1. doi request reprint Analysis of nonstandard noise dosimeter microphone positions
    David C Byrne
    Robert A Taft Laboratories, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, USA
    J Occup Environ Hyg 5:197-209. 2008
  2. doi request reprint Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs
    David C Byrne
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA
    Noise Health 13:86-92. 2011
  3. doi request reprint Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation
    William J Murphy
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226 1998, USA
    Noise Health 13:132-41. 2011
  4. ncbi request reprint Inter-laboratory Comparison of Three Earplug Fit-test Systems
    David C Byrne
    a NIOSH Robert A Taft Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH
    J Occup Environ Hyg . 2016
  5. ncbi request reprint Two case studies for fit testing hearing protector devices
    William J Murphy
    Hearing Loss Prevention Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH
    J Acoust Soc Am 132:2013. 2012
  6. ncbi request reprint Working in noise with a hearing loss: perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers
    Thais C Morata
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Ear Hear 26:529-45. 2005
  7. doi request reprint Results of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-U.S. Environmental Protection Agency interlaboratory comparison of American National Standards Institute S12.6-1997 Methods A and B
    William J Murphy
    Hearing Loss Prevention Team, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C 27, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226 1998, USA
    J Acoust Soc Am 125:3262-77. 2009

Detail Information

Publications9

  1. doi request reprint Analysis of nonstandard noise dosimeter microphone positions
    David C Byrne
    Robert A Taft Laboratories, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226, USA
    J Occup Environ Hyg 5:197-209. 2008
    ....
  2. doi request reprint Relationship between comfort and attenuation measurements for two types of earplugs
    David C Byrne
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, USA
    Noise Health 13:86-92. 2011
    ..The primary research objective was to determine whether hearing protector comfort was related to measured attenuation values. A linear mixed effects model provided evidence for an inverse relationship between comfort and attenuation...
  3. doi request reprint Effects of training on hearing protector attenuation
    William J Murphy
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH 45226 1998, USA
    Noise Health 13:132-41. 2011
    ..Several comparisons evaluating the order of testing, the type of testing, and statistical tests of the performance across the groups are presented...
  4. ncbi request reprint Inter-laboratory Comparison of Three Earplug Fit-test Systems
    David C Byrne
    a NIOSH Robert A Taft Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH
    J Occup Environ Hyg . 2016
    ..4 dB difference with ANSI and REAT estimates. Factors such as the experience of study participants and test administrators, and the fit-test psychometric tasks are suggested as possible contributors to the observed results...
  5. ncbi request reprint Two case studies for fit testing hearing protector devices
    William J Murphy
    Hearing Loss Prevention Team, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, Cincinnati, OH
    J Acoust Soc Am 132:2013. 2012
    ..The average time to complete the fit tests was 10 minutes. If retraining was necessary, then an additional 3 to 6 minutes were required...
  6. ncbi request reprint Working in noise with a hearing loss: perceptions from workers, supervisors, and hearing conservation program managers
    Thais C Morata
    National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Ear Hear 26:529-45. 2005
    ....
  7. doi request reprint Results of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-U.S. Environmental Protection Agency interlaboratory comparison of American National Standards Institute S12.6-1997 Methods A and B
    William J Murphy
    Hearing Loss Prevention Team, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 4676 Columbia Parkway, MS C 27, Cincinnati, Ohio 45226 1998, USA
    J Acoust Soc Am 125:3262-77. 2009
    ..These differences resulted in considerably more subjects being required to identify statistically significant differences between laboratories for Method A (12-132 subjects) than for Method B (9-28 subjects)...