- Combining individual patient data and aggregate data in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: Individual patient data may be beneficial if only for a subset of trialsSarah Donegan
Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GS, UK
Stat Med 32:914-30. 2013..We extend the methodology to combine IPD and AD in a mixed treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis...
- Assessing the consistency assumption by exploring treatment by covariate interactions in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: individual patient-level covariates versus aggregate trial-level covariatesSarah Donegan
Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GS, UK
Stat Med 31:3840-57. 2012..Using AD models, there was no evidence that the consistency assumption was invalid; whereas, the assumption was questionable based on the IPD models. The AD analyses were misleading...
- Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological qualitySarah Donegan
Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
PLoS ONE 5:e11054. 2010..Our aim is to systematically review the quality of published indirect comparisons to add to existing empirical data suggesting that improvements can be made when reporting and applying indirect comparisons...