Sarah Donegan

Summary

Affiliation: University of Liverpool
Country: UK

Publications

  1. doi request reprint Combining individual patient data and aggregate data in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: Individual patient data may be beneficial if only for a subset of trials
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GS, UK
    Stat Med 32:914-30. 2013
  2. doi request reprint Assessing the consistency assumption by exploring treatment by covariate interactions in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: individual patient-level covariates versus aggregate trial-level covariates
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GS, UK
    Stat Med 31:3840-57. 2012
  3. pmc Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality
    Sarah Donegan
    Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    PLoS ONE 5:e11054. 2010
  4. doi request reprint Assessing key assumptions of network meta-analysis: a review of methods
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GS, UK
    Res Synth Methods 4:291-323. 2013
  5. pmc Deworming drugs for soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on nutritional indicators, haemoglobin, and school performance
    David C Taylor-Robinson
    Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD000371. 2015
  6. doi request reprint A systematic review of placebo-controlled trials of topiramate: How useful is a multiple-indications review for evaluating the adverse events of an antiepileptic drug?
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Epilepsia 56:1910-20. 2015
  7. pmc Cluster Randomised Trials in Cochrane Reviews: Evaluation of Methodological and Reporting Practice
    Marty Richardson
    Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    PLoS ONE 11:e0151818. 2016

Collaborators

Detail Information

Publications7

  1. doi request reprint Combining individual patient data and aggregate data in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: Individual patient data may be beneficial if only for a subset of trials
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GS, UK
    Stat Med 32:914-30. 2013
    ..We extend the methodology to combine IPD and AD in a mixed treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis...
  2. doi request reprint Assessing the consistency assumption by exploring treatment by covariate interactions in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: individual patient-level covariates versus aggregate trial-level covariates
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GS, UK
    Stat Med 31:3840-57. 2012
    ..Using AD models, there was no evidence that the consistency assumption was invalid; whereas, the assumption was questionable based on the IPD models. The AD analyses were misleading...
  3. pmc Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality
    Sarah Donegan
    Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    PLoS ONE 5:e11054. 2010
    ..Our aim is to systematically review the quality of published indirect comparisons to add to existing empirical data suggesting that improvements can be made when reporting and applying indirect comparisons...
  4. doi request reprint Assessing key assumptions of network meta-analysis: a review of methods
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GS, UK
    Res Synth Methods 4:291-323. 2013
    ..Homogeneity and consistency assumptions underlie network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods exist to assess the assumptions but they are rarely and poorly applied. We review and illustrate methods to assess homogeneity and consistency...
  5. pmc Deworming drugs for soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on nutritional indicators, haemoglobin, and school performance
    David C Taylor-Robinson
    Department of Public Health and Policy, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, Merseyside, UK
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD000371. 2015
    ..As the intervention is often claimed to have important health, nutrition, and societal effects beyond the removal of worms, we critically evaluated the evidence on benefits...
  6. doi request reprint A systematic review of placebo-controlled trials of topiramate: How useful is a multiple-indications review for evaluating the adverse events of an antiepileptic drug?
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    Epilepsia 56:1910-20. 2015
    ..We conducted a multiple-indications review by systematically reviewing randomized placebo-controlled trials of TPM, to compare the nervous system AEs of TPM in epilepsy with those in other indications...
  7. pmc Cluster Randomised Trials in Cochrane Reviews: Evaluation of Methodological and Reporting Practice
    Marty Richardson
    Centre for Evidence Synthesis in Global Health, Department of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    PLoS ONE 11:e0151818. 2016
    ..The aim of this study was to assess the methodological and reporting practice of Cochrane reviews that included C-RCTs against criteria developed from existing guidance...