Affiliation: Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience
- Phonological processing of ignored distractor pictures, an fMRI investigationMart Bles
Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
BMC Neurosci 9:20. 2008..e. shared the same consonant-vowel onset construction), or unrelated. Attention was directed either at the linguistic properties of one of these pictures, or at the fixation point (i.e. away from the pictures)...
- Detecting concealed information using brain-imaging technologyMart Bles
Bernstein Center for Computational Neuroscience Berlin, Charite Universitatsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
Neurocase 14:82-92. 2008..Here, we review the key problems with conventional lie-detection technology and critically discuss the potential of novel techniques that aim to directly read concealed mental states out of patterns of brain activity...
- Neural aspects of cohort-size reduction during visual gatingMart Bles
Maastricht University, Faculty of Psychology, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
Brain Res 1150:143-54. 2007..These results show that a visual gating paradigm can be used to disentangle coactivation of lexical candidates from inhibition of non-matching items, and that these processes are closely related to each other in time...
- Receptive field size-dependent attention effects in simultaneously presented stimulus displaysMart Bles
Maastricht University, Faculty of Psychology, Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Neuroimage 30:506-11. 2006..Finally in area TEO, significant differences between attended and unattended conditions were observed for all spatial separations...
- Tracking the time course of phonological encoding in speech production: an event-related brain potential studyNiels O Schiller
Department of Neurocognition, Faculty of Psychology, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 17:819-31. 2003..Results revealed that both tasks generated effects that fall within the time window of phonological encoding. However, there was no timing difference between the two effects, suggesting that they occur approximately at the same time...