Atte Moilanen

Summary

Affiliation: University of Helsinki
Country: Finland

Publications

  1. ncbi request reprint Reserve selection using nonlinear species distribution models
    Atte Moilanen
    Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P O Box 65, FI 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
    Am Nat 165:695-706. 2005
  2. pmc Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems
    Atte Moilanen
    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Metapopulation Research Group, PO Box 65, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
    Proc Biol Sci 272:1885-91. 2005
  3. ncbi request reprint Uncertainty analysis for regional-scale reserve selection
    Atte Moilanen
    Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P O Box 65, FI 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
    Conserv Biol 20:1688-97. 2006
  4. ncbi request reprint The boundary-quality penalty: a quantitative method for approximating species responses to fragmentation in reserve selection
    Atte Moilanen
    Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P O Box 65 Viikinkaari 1, FI 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
    Conserv Biol 21:355-64. 2007
  5. ncbi request reprint Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization
    Atte Moilanen
    Finnish Centre of Excellence in Metapopulation Biology, Department of Biosciences, P O Box 65, FI 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
    Ecol Appl 21:1419-26. 2011
  6. pmc Complementarity and Area-Efficiency in the Prioritization of the Global Protected Area Network
    Peter Kullberg
    Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    PLoS ONE 10:e0145231. 2015
  7. ncbi request reprint Area-based refinement for selection of reserve sites with the benefit-function approach
    Anni Arponen
    Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P O Box 65 Viikinkaari 1, FI 00014, Helsinki, Finland
    Conserv Biol 21:527-33. 2007
  8. pmc Conservation planning with uncertain climate change projections
    Heini Kujala
    Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    PLoS ONE 8:e53315. 2013
  9. pmc Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning
    Aija S Kukkala
    Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 65, FIN 00014, Helsinki, Finland
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 88:443-64. 2013
  10. doi request reprint Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism
    Federico Montesino Pouzols
    Finnish Centre of Excellence in Metapopulation Biology, Department of Biosciences, Biocenter 3, University of Helsinki, PO Box 65 Viikinkaari 1, FI 00014 Helsinki, Finland
    Nature 516:383-6. 2014

Collaborators

Detail Information

Publications12

  1. ncbi request reprint Reserve selection using nonlinear species distribution models
    Atte Moilanen
    Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P O Box 65, FI 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
    Am Nat 165:695-706. 2005
    ....
  2. pmc Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems
    Atte Moilanen
    Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Metapopulation Research Group, PO Box 65, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
    Proc Biol Sci 272:1885-91. 2005
    ..In both cases, priority landscapes important for conservation management are identified...
  3. ncbi request reprint Uncertainty analysis for regional-scale reserve selection
    Atte Moilanen
    Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P O Box 65, FI 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
    Conserv Biol 20:1688-97. 2006
    ..g., probability of occurrence or abundance) and different landscape descriptions (grid or patch based) and incorporated into other reserve-selection algorithms and software...
  4. ncbi request reprint The boundary-quality penalty: a quantitative method for approximating species responses to fragmentation in reserve selection
    Atte Moilanen
    Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P O Box 65 Viikinkaari 1, FI 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
    Conserv Biol 21:355-64. 2007
    ..We implemented the BQP in the context of the Zonation method, but it could as well be implemented into any other spatially explicit reserve-planning framework...
  5. ncbi request reprint Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization
    Atte Moilanen
    Finnish Centre of Excellence in Metapopulation Biology, Department of Biosciences, P O Box 65, FI 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
    Ecol Appl 21:1419-26. 2011
    ..The proposed methods and software, Zonation, are applicable to structurally similar prioritization problems globally...
  6. pmc Complementarity and Area-Efficiency in the Prioritization of the Global Protected Area Network
    Peter Kullberg
    Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    PLoS ONE 10:e0145231. 2015
    ..According to our analysis, accounting for complementarity and area-efficiency can lead to considerable improvements when setting management priorities for the global protected area network. ..
  7. ncbi request reprint Area-based refinement for selection of reserve sites with the benefit-function approach
    Anni Arponen
    Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, P O Box 65 Viikinkaari 1, FI 00014, Helsinki, Finland
    Conserv Biol 21:527-33. 2007
    ..We recommend using a species-area refinement for practical, maximum-coverage conservation planning...
  8. pmc Conservation planning with uncertain climate change projections
    Heini Kujala
    Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
    PLoS ONE 8:e53315. 2013
    ..Doing so requires systematic treatment of uncertainties and testing of the sensitivity of results to assumptions about climate. We illustrate the proposed framework by identifying priority areas for amphibians and reptiles in Europe...
  9. pmc Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning
    Aija S Kukkala
    Department of Biosciences, University of Helsinki, PO Box 65, FIN 00014, Helsinki, Finland
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 88:443-64. 2013
    ..Through these concepts, this review serves as a source of information about the historical development of SCP. It provides a comprehensive review for anyone wishing to understand the key concepts of spatial prioritisation within SCP...
  10. doi request reprint Global protected area expansion is compromised by projected land-use and parochialism
    Federico Montesino Pouzols
    Finnish Centre of Excellence in Metapopulation Biology, Department of Biosciences, Biocenter 3, University of Helsinki, PO Box 65 Viikinkaari 1, FI 00014 Helsinki, Finland
    Nature 516:383-6. 2014
    ....
  11. doi request reprint Effects of connectivity and spatial resolution of analyses on conservation prioritization across large extents
    Anni Arponen
    Metapopulation Research Group, Department of Biosciences, P O Box 65, FI 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland
    Conserv Biol 26:294-304. 2012
    ..Our results show that large extent, fine-resolution analyses are computationally feasible, and we suggest they can give more flexibility to implementation of well-connected reserve networks...
  12. pmc Identification of policies for a sustainable legal trade in rhinoceros horn based on population projection and socioeconomic models
    Enrico DI Minin
    Finnish Centre of Excellence in Metapopulation Biology, Department of Biosciences, P O Box 65, FI 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland School of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu Natal, Durban, 4041, South Africa
    Conserv Biol 29:545-55. 2015
    ..Because current protection efforts seem to be failing, it is time to evaluate, discuss, and test alternatives to the present policy. ..