Research Topics
Species | RADIOLOGICAL RESEARCH ACCELERATOR FACILITY (RARAF)SummaryPrincipal Investigator: DAVID JONATHAN BRENNER Affiliation: Columbia University Country: USA Abstract: The technology development component focuses on four areas which our users have identified as ripe for enhancement: improved accuracy, enhanced imaging capabilities, extension of the charged-particle microbeam to X rays; and development of a simple stand-alone microbeam that can be used without physics support and can be potentially exported to other labs. A highlight regarding improved accuracy and reliability is that we have just received a $2M NIH high-end equipment grant (plus institutional support) for a new particle accelerator, central to the microbeam facility, which will be installed under the auspices of this P-41 grant. Highlights regarding enhanced imaging and sensor technology will be an on-line custom multi-photon imaging system to allow time-lapse fluorescent imaging of early (scale of seconds to minutes) radiation events in individual live cells, a new imaging system based on quantitative phase microscopy to image live cells and cell nuclei without use of potentially cytotoxic stains, and a system for single-cell microsensors to monitor the flux of molecules such as oxygen and NO, in microbeam-irradiated individual cells. In collaboration with a variety of investigators from outside and within Columbia University, 20 collaborative and service-based research projects are described, which both drive and utilize the new resources. All are logical outgrowths of current federally funded research In addition to the ongoing training of undergraduates, graduate students, and post docs, training will be enhanced through formal programs for high school students, high school teachers, and undergraduates. In addition to dissemination of material through talks, our website, and peer-reviewed publications, we will run a 2nd International Workshop "Imaging and Probing Individual Cells: Application to Signaling, Structure and Function", as well as the biannual "International Workshop on Microbeam Probes of Cellular Radiation Response". Funding Period: 1996-09-30 - 2009-08-31 more information: NIH RePORT Top Publications
| Scientific Experts
|
Detail Information
Publications
Stress-specific signatures: expression profiling of p53 wild-type and -null human cellsSally A Amundson
Gene Response Section, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Oncogene 24:4572-9. 2005..A set of 16 genes did exhibit a robust p53-dependent pattern of induction in response to all nine DNA-damaging agents, however...
Investigation of the ionisation density dependence of the glow curve characteristics of LIF:MG,TI (TLD-100)Y S Horowitz
Physics Department, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beersheva, Israel
Radiat Prot Dosimetry 131:406-13. 2008....
Microbeam-integrated multiphoton imaging systemAlan W Bigelow
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University, New York, New York 10032, USA
Rev Sci Instrum 79:123707. 2008..Design details and biology applications using this enhanced 3D-imaging technique at RARAF are reviewed...
Expanding the question-answering potential of single-cell microbeams at RARAF, USAAlan Bigelow
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University, Irvington, New York 10533 0021, USA
J Radiat Res 50:A21-8. 2009..Additionally, an update on the status of the other biology oriented microbeams in the Americas is provided...
Microbeam irradiation of the C. elegans nematodeAntonella Bertucci
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
J Radiat Res 50:A49-54. 2009..We used the RARAF microbeam to site specifically deliver 3 MeV protons to a site in the tail of young worms. GFP expression was enhanced after 24 hours in a number dependent manner at distances > 100 microm from the site of irradiation...
Advances in radiobiological studies using a microbeamTom K Hei
Center for Radiological Research, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
J Radiat Res 50:A7-A12. 2009..The identification of specific signaling pathways provides mechanistic insight on the nature of the bystander process...
Is there a place for quantitative risk assessment?Eric J Hall
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
J Radiol Prot 29:A171-84. 2009..These three examples, where uncertainties in quantitative risk estimates result in important practical problems, will be discussed...
A new view of radiation-induced cancer: integrating short- and long-term processes. Part II: second cancer risk estimationIgor Shuryak
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
Radiat Environ Biophys 48:275-86. 2009..Potentially, the model can be incorporated into radiotherapy treatment planning algorithms, adding second cancer risk as an optimization criterion...
A new view of radiation-induced cancer: integrating short- and long-term processes. Part I: approachIgor Shuryak
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
Radiat Environ Biophys 48:263-74. 2009....
Reduction of the secondary neutron dose in passively scattered proton radiotherapy, using an optimized pre-collimator/collimatorDavid J Brenner
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
Phys Med Biol 54:6065-78. 2009....
Biophysical models of radiation bystander effects: 1. Spatial effects in three-dimensional tissuesIgor Shuryak
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032, USA
Radiat Res 168:741-9. 2007..These assumptions are implemented by a mathematical formalism and computational algorithms. The model adequately describes data on bystander responses in the 3D system using a small number of adjustable parameters...
Reducing second breast cancers: a potential role for prophylactic mammary irradiationDavid J Brenner
Center for Radiological Research, Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
J Clin Oncol 25:4868-72. 2007
Second cancers after fractionated radiotherapy: stochastic population dynamics effectsRainer K Sachs
Departments of Mathematics and of Physics, University of California, 970 Evans Hall, MC 3840, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
J Theor Biol 249:518-31. 2007....
Biological effects in unirradiated human tissue induced by radiation damage up to 1 mm awayOleg V Belyakov
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:14203-8. 2005....
Ionizing radiation induces DNA double-strand breaks in bystander primary human fibroblastsMykyta V Sokolov
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinical Center, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Oncogene 24:7257-65. 2005..These studies show that H2AX phosphorylation is an early step in the bystander effect and that the DNA DSBs underlying gamma-H2AX focus formation may be responsible for its downstream manifestations...
Differential impact of mouse Rad9 deletion on ionizing radiation-induced bystander effectsAiping Zhu
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York 10032, USA
Radiat Res 164:655-61. 2005..Results are presented in the context of defining the function of Rad9 in the cellular response to radiation and its differential effects on individual bystander end points...
A microbeam study of DNA double-strand breaks in bystander primary human fibroblastsL B Smilenov
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University, College of Physicians and Surgeons, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry 122:256-9. 2006..The delay and persistence of the bystander response suggests a different mechanism of DSB induction in bystander cells than in directly irradiated cells...
Radiation-induced leukemia at doses relevant to radiation therapy: modeling mechanisms and estimating risksIgor Shuryak
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th St, New York, NY 10032, USA
J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1794-806. 2006....
Testing the stand-alone microbeam at Columbia UniversityG Garty
Columbia University, Radiological Research Accelerator Facility, 136 S Broadway, Irvington, NY 10533, USA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry 122:292-6. 2006..It also makes the microbeam simple and cheap enough to be realised in any large lab. The Microbeam design as well as first tests of its performance, using an accelerator-based beam are presented here...
DNA double-strand breaks form in bystander cells after microbeam irradiation of three-dimensional human tissue modelsOlga A Sedelnikova
Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
Cancer Res 67:4295-302. 2007..Thus, this study points to the importance of considering the indirect biological effects of radiation in cancer risk assessment...
Novel Al2O3:C,Mg fluorescent nuclear track detectors for passive neutron dosimetryG Jeff Sykora
Landauer, Inc, Stillwater Crystal Growth Division, Stillwater, OK 74074, USA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry 126:278-83. 2007..A specially developed image processing technique allows for fast fluorescent track identification and counting. The readout method is non-destructive, and detectors can be reused after thermal annealing...
DNA double-strand breaks are not sufficient to initiate recruitment of TRF2Eli S Williams
Nat Genet 39:696-8; author reply 698-9. 2007
Extrapolating radiation-induced cancer risks from low doses to very low dosesDavid J Brenner
Center for Radiological Research, Columbia University Medical Center, 630 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032, USA
Health Phys 97:505-9. 2009....
