Lee H Wurm

Summary

Affiliation: Wayne State University
Country: USA

Publications

  1. ncbi Performance in auditory and visual emotional stroop tasks: a comparison of older and younger adults
    Lee H Wurm
    Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
    Psychol Aging 19:523-35. 2004
  2. ncbi Recognition of spoken words: semantic effects in lexical access
    Lee H Wurm
    Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
    Lang Speech 47:175-204. 2004
  3. ncbi Danger and usefulness: an alternative framework for understanding rapid evaluation effects in perception?
    Lee H Wurm
    Department of Psychology and Program in Linguistics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA
    Psychon Bull Rev 14:1218-25. 2007
  4. doi Semantic effects in naming perceptual identification but not in delayed naming: implications for models and tasks
    Lee H Wurm
    Department of Psychology and Program in Linguistics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34:381-98. 2008
  5. doi Decreasing complexity of affective space in older adults lower on cognitive control: affective effects in a nonaffective task and with nonaffective stimuli
    Lee H Wurm
    Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, 5057 Woodward Avenue 7th floor, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
    Psychol Aging 26:716-30. 2011
  6. doi A comparison of stimulus ratings made online and in person: gender and method effects
    Diana A Barenboym
    Department of Psychology and Program in Linguistics, Wayne State University, 5057 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
    Behav Res Methods 42:273-85. 2010

Collaborators

Detail Information

Publications6

  1. ncbi Performance in auditory and visual emotional stroop tasks: a comparison of older and younger adults
    Lee H Wurm
    Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
    Psychol Aging 19:523-35. 2004
    ..Latencies were longer for test words high on arousal, but only for older adults. Results are discussed in terms of inhibitory cognitive processes, attention, and theories of emotional development...
  2. ncbi Recognition of spoken words: semantic effects in lexical access
    Lee H Wurm
    Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
    Lang Speech 47:175-204. 2004
    ..Results are discussed against evidence from several areas of research suggesting a role of behaviorally important information in perception...
  3. ncbi Danger and usefulness: an alternative framework for understanding rapid evaluation effects in perception?
    Lee H Wurm
    Department of Psychology and Program in Linguistics, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48202, USA
    Psychon Bull Rev 14:1218-25. 2007
    ..It may be a manifestation of the rapid evaluation effects pervasive in the literature. Post hoc analyses showed that danger and usefulness explain as much variance as valence and arousal, or evaluation, potency, and activity...
  4. doi Semantic effects in naming perceptual identification but not in delayed naming: implications for models and tasks
    Lee H Wurm
    Department of Psychology and Program in Linguistics, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34:381-98. 2008
    ..The interaction cannot be characterized as a tradeoff of speed versus accuracy...
  5. doi Decreasing complexity of affective space in older adults lower on cognitive control: affective effects in a nonaffective task and with nonaffective stimuli
    Lee H Wurm
    Department of Psychology, Wayne State University, 5057 Woodward Avenue 7th floor, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
    Psychol Aging 26:716-30. 2011
    ..Affective effects emerge even in nonaffective contexts. The tight link between affect and cognition is discussed...
  6. doi A comparison of stimulus ratings made online and in person: gender and method effects
    Diana A Barenboym
    Department of Psychology and Program in Linguistics, Wayne State University, 5057 Woodward Avenue, Detroit, MI 48202, USA
    Behav Res Methods 42:273-85. 2010
    ..Furthermore, the categorization of 17.9% (Experiment 1) and 5.3% (Experiment 2) of the items as high or low depends on which ratings are used. Ratings gathered in person and online cannot be freely substituted...