Research Topics
| E G McFarlandSummaryAffiliation: Washington University School of Medicine Country: USA Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Spiral CT colonography: reader agreement and diagnostic performance with two- and three-dimensional image-display techniquesE G McFarland
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
Radiology 218:375-83. 2001..To assess the diagnostic performance and reader agreement with two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) display techniques for detecting colorectal polyps with spiral computed tomographic (CT) colonography...
CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performanceElizabeth G McFarland
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
Radiology 225:380-90. 2002....
Influence of image acquisition parameters on CT artifacts and polyp depiction in spiral CT colonography: in vitro evaluationB R Whiting
Electronic Radiology Lab, and Abdominal Imaging Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
Radiology 217:165-72. 2000..To quantify the effects of spiral computed tomographic (CT) acquisition parameters on the magnitude of three-dimensional (3D) rippling artifacts and polyp depiction...
Detection of primary hepatic malignancy in liver transplant candidates: prospective comparison of CT, MR imaging, US, and PETSharlene A Teefey
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, 510 S Kingshighway Blvd, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
Radiology 226:533-42. 2003....
Reader strategies for CT colonographyE G McFarland
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, 510 South Kingshighway Boulevard, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
Abdom Imaging 27:275-83. 2002
Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparationStephen L Ristvedt
Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110-1093, USA
Am J Gastroenterol 98:578-85. 2003..CONCLUSIONS: Overall appraisals were similar and positive for both CT colonography and colonoscopy, with less favorable appraisals of the bowel preparation. Most patients stated that they would prefer CT for future evaluation...
Another new look at the small bowel: feasibility of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging to evaluate Crohn's diseaseElizabeth G McFarland
Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
Inflamm Bowel Dis 9:134-5. 2003
ACR Colon Cancer Committee white paper: status of CT colonography 2009Elizabeth G McFarland
Center for Diagnostic Imaging, St Louis, Missouri, USA
J Am Coll Radiol 6:756-772.e4. 2009..To review the current status and rationale of the updated ACR practice guidelines for CT colonography (CTC)...
