Research Topics
| Paul R WolpeSummaryAffiliation: University of Pennsylvania Country: USA Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Treatment, enhancement, and the ethics of neurotherapeuticsPaul Root Wolpe
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Brain Cogn 50:387-95. 2002..Arguements for and against neurological enhancement are reviewed, and historical and social perspectives are offered...
Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do?Martha J Farah
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, 3720 Walnut Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
Nat Rev Neurosci 5:421-5. 2004
Re-examining ethical obligations in the intensive care unit: HIV disclosure to surrogatesAnthony T Vernillo
New York University College of Dentistry, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Radiology and Medicine, New York, New York 10010, USA
Crit Care 11:125. 2007..We also provide a tabulation of individual US state laws relevant to disclosure of HIV status...
Ethics and social policy in research on the neuroscience of human sexualityPaul R Wolpe
Department of Psychiatry and Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
Nat Neurosci 7:1031-3. 2004..If serious research in sexuality is to be supported by the public, researchers must continue to earn society's trust with responsible and thoughtful presentation of their work...
How do women decide? Accepting or declining BRCA1/2 testing in a nationwide clinical sample in the United StatesPamela Sankar
Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Community Genet 9:78-86. 2006..To examine the role of the practitioner, informed consent, and genetic counseling in genetic testing decisions and to assess their relative influence on women's decision to have clinical BRCA1/2 testing...
Bioethics, the genome, and the Jewish bodyPaul Root Wolpe
Center of Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Conserv Jud 54:14-25. 2002
Monitoring and manipulating brain function: new neuroscience technologies and their ethical implicationsMartha J Farah
Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, USA
Hastings Cent Rep 34:35-45. 2004
What is in a cause? Exploring the relationship between genetic cause and felt stigmaPamela Sankar
Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania, 3401 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Genet Med 8:33-42. 2006..However, whether a genetic or hereditary basis necessarily confers a stigma to a condition remains unexamined...
The neuroscience revolutionPaul Root Wolpe
Hastings Cent Rep 32:8. 2002
Emerging neurotechnologies for lie detection and the fifth amendmentSarah E Stoller
New York University School of Law, USA
Am J Law Med 33:359-75. 2007
Ethics and the practice of brain scienceBernard Lo
Program in Medical Ethics, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
Cerebrum 4:64-6. 2002
Emerging neurotechnologies for lie-detection: promises and perilsPaul Root Wolpe
University of Pennsylvania, USA
Am J Bioeth 5:39-49. 2005..Premature application of these technologies outside of research settings should be resisted, and the social conversation about the appropriate parameters of its civil, forensic, and security use should begin...
Disciplining bioethicsPaul Root Wolpe
Am J Bioeth 8:1-2. 2008
