Peter E Turkeltaub
Affiliation: University of Pennsylvania
- Meta-analysis of the functional neuroanatomy of single-word reading: method and validationPeter E Turkeltaub
Center for the Study of Learning, Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA
Neuroimage 16:765-80. 2002..Advantages of this automated meta-analysis technique include quantification of the level of concordance at all brain locations and the provision for use of a threshold for statistical significance of concordance...
- Localization of sublexical speech perception componentsPeter E Turkeltaub
Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, 3 West Gates Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Brain Lang 114:1-15. 2010....
- Minimizing within-experiment and within-group effects in Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysesPeter E Turkeltaub
Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Hum Brain Mapp 33:1-13. 2012..Combining the two modifications minimizes both within-experiment and within-group effects, optimizing the degree to which ALE values represent concordance of findings across independent reports...
- Are networks for residual language function and recovery consistent across aphasic patients?Peter E Turkeltaub
Laboratory for Cognition and Neural Stimulation, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, 3400 Spruce Street, 3W Gates Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Neurology 76:1726-34. 2011..To address this question, we performed a meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies of chronic aphasia after stroke...
- The right hemisphere is not unitary in its role in aphasia recoveryPeter E Turkeltaub
Laboratory for Cognition and Neural Stimulation, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Cortex 48:1179-86. 2012..No support is found for interhemispheric inhibition, the theoretical framework on which most therapeutic brain stimulation protocols for aphasia are based...
- Parietal influence on temporal encoding indexed by simultaneous transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalographyMartin Wiener
Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
J Neurosci 32:12258-67. 2012..These results suggest that a feedforward mechanism from parietal to prefrontal regions mediates temporal encoding and demonstrate a dissociation between early and late phases of encoding processes...
- Implicit timing activates the left inferior parietal cortexMartin Wiener
Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 6241, USA
Neuropsychologia 48:3967-71. 2010..Furthermore, in conjunction with a previously reported meta-analysis of explicit timing tasks, our data support the claim that implicit and explicit timing are supported by at least partially distinct neural structures...
- Blood flow and oxygenation changes due to low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebral cortexRickson C Mesquita
University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
J Biomed Opt 18:067006. 2013..29). In total, these findings provide new information about hemodynamic/metabolic responses to low-frequency rTMS and, importantly, demonstrate the feasibility of DCS/DOS for noninvasive monitoring of TMS-induced physiologic effects...
- Left lateralizing transcranial direct current stimulation improves reading efficiencyPeter E Turkeltaub
Laboratory for Cognition and Neural Stimulation, Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Brain Stimul 5:201-7. 2012..Previous research has demonstrated a relationship between left posterior temporal cortex (pTC) function and reading ability, regardless of dyslexia status...
- Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulationSudha Kilaru Kessler
Division of Neurology, Children s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
Brain Stimul 5:155-62. 2012..Few have directly evaluated whether sham and active stimulation are indistinguishable...