William R Shadish

Summary

Affiliation: University of California
Country: USA

Publications

  1. ncbi The common threads in program evaluation
    William R Shadish
    Prev Chronic Dis 3:A03. 2006
  2. ncbi A randomized experiment comparing random and cutoff-based assignment
    William R Shadish
    School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, Merced, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343, USA
    Psychol Methods 16:179-91. 2011
  3. ncbi Campbell and Rubin: A primer and comparison of their approaches to causal inference in field settings
    William R Shadish
    University of California, Merced, CA 95344, USA
    Psychol Methods 15:3-17. 2010
  4. ncbi Using UnGraph to extract data from image files: verification of reliability and validity
    William R Shadish
    University of California, Merced, P O Box 2039, Merced, CA 95344, USA
    Behav Res Methods 41:177-83. 2009
  5. ncbi The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions
    William R Shadish
    University of California, Merced, California 95344, USA
    Annu Rev Psychol 60:607-29. 2009
  6. ncbi Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008
    William R Shadish
    University of California, Merced 95343, USA
    Behav Res Methods 43:971-80. 2011
  7. ncbi Effects of behavioral marital therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    William R Shadish
    School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, Merced, CA 95344, USA
    J Consult Clin Psychol 73:6-14. 2005
  8. ncbi Empirically supported treatments or type I errors? Problems with the analysis of data from group-administered treatments
    Scott A Baldwin
    Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
    J Consult Clin Psychol 73:924-35. 2005
  9. ncbi Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test
    Jason K Luellen
    Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, TN 38152 3230, USA
    Eval Rev 29:530-58. 2005
  10. ncbi Increasing the degrees of freedom in future group randomized trials: the df* approach
    Jonathan L Blitstein
    Psychology of Health Behavior Program, RTI International
    Eval Rev 29:268-86. 2005

Collaborators

Detail Information

Publications12

  1. ncbi The common threads in program evaluation
    William R Shadish
    Prev Chronic Dis 3:A03. 2006
  2. ncbi A randomized experiment comparing random and cutoff-based assignment
    William R Shadish
    School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, Merced, 5200 North Lake Road, Merced, CA 95343, USA
    Psychol Methods 16:179-91. 2011
    ..Results suggest that estimates from regression discontinuity designs approximate the results of randomized experiments reasonably well but also raise the issue of what constitutes agreement between the 2 estimates...
  3. ncbi Campbell and Rubin: A primer and comparison of their approaches to causal inference in field settings
    William R Shadish
    University of California, Merced, CA 95344, USA
    Psychol Methods 15:3-17. 2010
    ..However, the 2 approaches also speak modestly different languages that leave some questions about their total commensurability that only continued dialogue can fully clarify...
  4. ncbi Using UnGraph to extract data from image files: verification of reliability and validity
    William R Shadish
    University of California, Merced, P O Box 2039, Merced, CA 95344, USA
    Behav Res Methods 41:177-83. 2009
    ..These results suggest that researchers can use extracted data with a high degree of confidence that they are nearly identical to the original data...
  5. ncbi The renaissance of field experimentation in evaluating interventions
    William R Shadish
    University of California, Merced, California 95344, USA
    Annu Rev Psychol 60:607-29. 2009
    ..We also cover the key empirical evidence showing the conditions under which some nonrandomized experiments may be able to approximate results from randomized experiments...
  6. ncbi Characteristics of single-case designs used to assess intervention effects in 2008
    William R Shadish
    University of California, Merced 95343, USA
    Behav Res Methods 43:971-80. 2011
    ..The results have implications for the contributions of single-case designs to evidence-based practice and suggest a number of future research directions...
  7. ncbi Effects of behavioral marital therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    William R Shadish
    School of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, University of California, Merced, CA 95344, USA
    J Consult Clin Psychol 73:6-14. 2005
    ..This bias may inflate the effects of behavioral marital therapies reported in previous meta-analyses, though we also explore a number of alternative explanations for this small sample bias...
  8. ncbi Empirically supported treatments or type I errors? Problems with the analysis of data from group-administered treatments
    Scott A Baldwin
    Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA
    J Consult Clin Psychol 73:924-35. 2005
    ..Of the 33 studies, 6-19 studies no longer had any significant results after correction. The authors end by providing recommendations for researchers planning group-administered treatment research...
  9. ncbi Propensity scores: an introduction and experimental test
    Jason K Luellen
    Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, TN 38152 3230, USA
    Eval Rev 29:530-58. 2005
    ..The latter two examples serve as an introduction for researchers interested in computing propensity scores using more complex classification algorithms known as ensemble methods...
  10. ncbi Increasing the degrees of freedom in future group randomized trials: the df* approach
    Jonathan L Blitstein
    Psychology of Health Behavior Program, RTI International
    Eval Rev 29:268-86. 2005
    ..The authors discuss the circumstances under which this strategy will be most helpful and the risks associated with conducting smaller studies...
  11. ncbi Increasing the degrees of freedom in existing group randomized trials: the df* approach
    Jonathan L Blitstein
    Psychology of Health Behavior Program, RTI International
    Eval Rev 29:241-67. 2005
    ..The authors discuss the limitations of this approach and the circumstances in which it is likely to be helpful...
  12. ncbi Meta-analysis of MFT interventions
    William R Shadish
    Department of Psychology, University of Memphis, USA
    J Marital Fam Ther 29:547-70. 2003
    ..The article concludes with recommendations for doing better meta-analyses...