J A Seibert

Summary

Affiliation: University of California
Country: USA

Publications

  1. ncbi X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 2: X-ray interactions and image formation
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA
    J Nucl Med Technol 33:3-18. 2005
  2. ncbi An improved method for flat-field correction of flat panel x-ray detector
    Alexander L C Kwan
    Department of Radiology, U. C. Davis Medical Center, X-ray Imaging Laboratory, 4701 X Street, Sacramento, California 95817, USA
    Med Phys 33:391-3. 2006
  3. ncbi The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    Pediatr Radiol 41:573-81. 2011
  4. ncbi Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    Health Phys 95:586-98. 2008
  5. ncbi Flat-panel detectors: how much better are they?
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y St, Ste 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    Pediatr Radiol 36:173-81. 2006
  6. ncbi Tradeoffs between image quality and dose
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, Imaging Research Center, University of California Davis, 4701 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    Pediatr Radiol 34:S183-95; discussion S234-41. 2004
  7. ncbi Cassette-based digital mammography
    J A Seibert
    Department of Radiology, UC Davis Medical Center, Imaging Research Center, 4701 X Street, Sacramento, California 95817, USA
    Technol Cancer Res Treat 3:413-27. 2004
  8. ncbi X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 1: Basic principles of x-ray production
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, Imaging Research Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA
    J Nucl Med Technol 32:139-47. 2004
  9. ncbi Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results
    J M Boone
    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento 95817, USA
    Med Phys 27:2408-16. 2000
  10. ncbi Monte Carlo assessment of computed tomography dose to tissue adjacent to the scanned volume
    J M Boone
    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento 95817, USA
    Med Phys 27:2393-407. 2000

Detail Information

Publications33

  1. ncbi X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 2: X-ray interactions and image formation
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA
    J Nucl Med Technol 33:3-18. 2005
    ..In this article, the principles of x-ray interactions and image formation are discussed, in preparation for a general review of CT (part 3) and a more detailed investigation of PET/CT scanners in part 4...
  2. ncbi An improved method for flat-field correction of flat panel x-ray detector
    Alexander L C Kwan
    Department of Radiology, U. C. Davis Medical Center, X-ray Imaging Laboratory, 4701 X Street, Sacramento, California 95817, USA
    Med Phys 33:391-3. 2006
    ..76 for the fixed correction method to 4.13 for the variable flat-field correction method with a fourth-order polynomial fit for the 60 kVp spectrum, and from 16.42 to 3.97 for the 95 kVp spectrum...
  3. ncbi The standardized exposure index for digital radiography: an opportunity for optimization of radiation dose to the pediatric population
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    Pediatr Radiol 41:573-81. 2011
    ....
  4. ncbi Digital radiography: image quality and radiation dose
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    Health Phys 95:586-98. 2008
    ..Thus many issues must be considered for optimal implementation of digital radiography, as reviewed in this article...
  5. ncbi Flat-panel detectors: how much better are they?
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, 4860 Y St, Ste 3100, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    Pediatr Radiol 36:173-81. 2006
    ..The answer to the question "how much better are they?" is "significantly better", and they are certainly worth consideration for replacement or new implementation of an imaging suite for pediatric fluoroscopy...
  6. ncbi Tradeoffs between image quality and dose
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, Imaging Research Center, University of California Davis, 4701 X Street, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    Pediatr Radiol 34:S183-95; discussion S234-41. 2004
    ..This requires continuous diligence to quality control and feedback mechanisms to verify that the goals of image quality, dose and ALARA are achieved...
  7. ncbi Cassette-based digital mammography
    J A Seibert
    Department of Radiology, UC Davis Medical Center, Imaging Research Center, 4701 X Street, Sacramento, California 95817, USA
    Technol Cancer Res Treat 3:413-27. 2004
    ..Clinical experience in an IRB-approved research trial has suggested that digital mammography with photostimulable storage phosphors and a dedicated CR reader is a viable alternative to conventional screen-film mammography...
  8. ncbi X-ray imaging physics for nuclear medicine technologists. Part 1: Basic principles of x-ray production
    J Anthony Seibert
    Department of Radiology, Imaging Research Center, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA
    J Nucl Med Technol 32:139-47. 2004
    ....
  9. ncbi Scatter/primary in mammography: comprehensive results
    J M Boone
    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento 95817, USA
    Med Phys 27:2408-16. 2000
    ..3960980055927, and c = 8.85064260299289, the equation SPR= [a + b x (diameter in cm)--(-1.5) + c x (thickness in cm) --(-0.5)]-- -1 produces SPR data from 2 to 8 cm and from 3 to 30 cm breast diameters with an average error of about 1%...
  10. ncbi Monte Carlo assessment of computed tomography dose to tissue adjacent to the scanned volume
    J M Boone
    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento 95817, USA
    Med Phys 27:2393-407. 2000
    ..The tables should be useful for medical physicists and radiologists in the estimation of dose to sites beyond the edge of the CT scanned volume...
  11. ncbi An edge spread technique for measurement of the scatter-to-primary ratio in mammography
    V N Cooper
    University of California, Davis, Department of Radiology, Sacramento 95817, USA
    Med Phys 27:845-53. 2000
    ..20+/-0.01, 0.35+/-0.02, and 0.53+/-0.02, respectively. The measured SPRs for 2, 4, and 6 cm 100% glandular phantoms imaged at 28 kV were 0.22+/-0.02, 0.42+/-0.03, and 0.88+/-0.08, respectively...
  12. ncbi Considerations for selecting a digital radiography system
    Richard L Morin
    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, Imaging Research Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    J Am Coll Radiol 2:287-90. 2005
  13. ncbi Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation
    J M Boone
    Department of Radiology, X ray Imaging Laboratory, University of California, Davis Medical Center, 4701 X St, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    Radiology 221:657-67. 2001
    ..To evaluate the feasibility of breast computed tomography (CT) in terms of radiation dose and image quality...
  14. ncbi Radiation safety in pain medicine
    Scott M Fishman
    Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA
    Reg Anesth Pain Med 27:296-305. 2002
  15. ncbi Technique factors and their relationship to radiation dose in pendant geometry breast CT
    John M Boone
    Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California 95817, USA
    Med Phys 32:3767-76. 2005
    ..Tables are provided for both air kerma at the isocenter and mAs for 0%, 50%, and 100% glandular breasts. Other issues that impact breast CT technique factors are also discussed...
  16. ncbi Grid and slot scan scatter reduction in mammography: comparison by using Monte Carlo techniques
    John M Boone
    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, 4701 X St, Research Imaging Laboratory, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    Radiology 222:519-27. 2002
    ..To evaluate a comprehensive array of scatter cleanup techniques in mammography by using a consistent methodology...
  17. ncbi Dose reduction in pediatric CT: a rational approach
    John M Boone
    Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Research Imaging Center, 4701 X St, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    Radiology 228:352-60. 2003
    ..To determine size-dependent technique factors for pediatric computed tomography (CT) by using physically measured objective data...
  18. ncbi Determining sensitivity of mammography from screening data, cancer incidence, and receiver-operating characteristic curve parameters
    John M Boone
    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento 95817, USA
    Med Decis Making 22:228-37. 2002
    ....
  19. ncbi Automated recognition of lateral from PA chest radiographs: saving seconds in a PACS environment
    John M Boone
    Department of Radiology, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    J Digit Imaging 16:345-9. 2003
    ..The accumulated time saved by correctly positioning the lateral and PA chest images on the work station monitors in accordance with each radiologist's hanging protocols was estimated to be about 1 week of radiologist time per year...
  20. ncbi Addressing the coming radiology crisis-the Society for Computer Applications in Radiology transforming the radiological interpretation process (TRIP) initiative
    Katherine P Andriole
    Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02120, USA
    J Digit Imaging 17:235-43. 2004
    ....
  21. ncbi Optimization of exposure parameters in full field digital mammography
    Mark B Williams
    Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908, USA
    Med Phys 35:2414-23. 2008
    ..In most cases, the AECs of the FFDM systems successfully identified exposure parameters resulting in FOM values near the maximum ones, however, there were several examples where AEC performance could be improved...
  22. ncbi Digital mammography image quality: image display
    Eliot Siegel
    University of Maryland, Department of Radiology, Baltimore, MD, USA
    J Am Coll Radiol 3:615-27. 2006
    ....
  23. ncbi Storage, transmission, and retrieval of digital mammography, including recommendations on image compression
    David Avrin
    University of Utah, Department of Radiology, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
    J Am Coll Radiol 3:609-14. 2006
    ....
  24. ncbi Internal densitometric gating for digital subtraction angiography
    J A Seibert
    Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento
    Invest Radiol 24:350-60. 1989
    ..Using these techniques permits the nonarbitrary matching of mask and contrast images without physiologic monitoring. The techniques are straightforward and relatively easy to implement on systems designed for rapid digital imaging...
  25. ncbi Performance evaluation of computed radiography systems
    E Samei
    Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
    Med Phys 28:361-71. 2001
    ..This paper further clarifies the recommendations with respect to the beam filtration to be used for exposure calibration of the system, and the calibration of automatic exposure control systems...
  26. ncbi AAPM/RSNA tutorial on equipment selection: PACS equipment overview: general guidelines for purchasing and acceptance testing of PACS equipment
    Ehsan Samei
    Department of Radiology, Duke University, DUMC Box 3302, Durham, NC 27710, USA
    Radiographics 24:313-34. 2004
    ..After the PACS has been installed, the user should perform technical and clinical acceptance testing to ensure that the system meets expectations...
  27. ncbi Digital radiography image quality: image acquisition
    Mark B Williams
    Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
    J Am Coll Radiol 4:371-88. 2007
    ..This document provides a basis for the technologies available today in clinical practice and may be useful in guiding the future clinical practice of digital radiography...
  28. ncbi Digital radiography image quality: image processing and display
    Elizabeth A Krupinski
    Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, Ariz, USA
    J Am Coll Radiol 4:389-400. 2007
    ..The practice of digital radiography is a rapidly evolving technology that will require timely revision of any guidelines and standards...
  29. ncbi Description and implementation of a quality control program in an imaging-based clinical trial
    Christopher H Cagnon
    Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, BH-427D, CHS, 10833 LeConte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1721, USA
    Acad Radiol 13:1431-41. 2006
    ..CONCLUSION: Standardization of imaging protocols is a critical component of image-based clinical trials, predicated on ongoing dialogue between sites and a centralized review committee...
  30. ncbi Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisition
    Mark B Williams
    University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 1339, USA
    J Am Coll Radiol 3:589-608. 2006
    ....
  31. ncbi Comparison of dual energy detector system performance
    Robert E Alvarez
    Aprend Technology, Mountain View, California 94043, USA
    Med Phys 31:556-65. 2004
    ....
  32. ncbi Mammography "dose creep": causes and solutions
    J Anthony Seibert
    Acad Radiol 11:487-8. 2004
  33. ncbi Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: do fluoroscopy operators know about radiation dose, and should they want to know?
    J Anthony Seibert
    Radiology 232:633-4. 2004