Research Topics
| T SchmaderSummaryAffiliation: University of Arizona Country: USA Publications
|
Detail Information
Publications
Devaluing domains in response to threatening intergroup comparisons: perceived legitimacy and the status value asymmetryT Schmader
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721 0068, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 80:782-96. 2001..Mediational analyses suggested that the status value asymmetry was explained by the perceived utility of the domain for gaining status-relevant rewards...
A metacognitive perspective on the cognitive deficits experienced in intellectually threatening environmentsToni Schmader
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
Pers Soc Psychol Bull 35:584-96. 2009....
Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacityToni Schmader
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson 85721, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 85:440-52. 2003..Implications for future research on stereotype threat and working memory are discussed...
An integrated process model of stereotype threat effects on performanceToni Schmader
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Psychol Rev 115:336-56. 2008..The active monitoring mechanism disrupts performance on sensorimotor tasks directly. Empirical evidence for these assertions is reviewed, and implications for interventions designed to alleviate stereotype threat are discussed...
Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: examining the influence of emotion regulationMichael Johns
Department of Psychology, University of Wyoming, USA
J Exp Psychol Gen 137:691-705. 2008..They discuss these results within the framework of an integrated process model of stereotype threat, in which affective and cognitive processes interact to undermine performance...
The role of devaluing and discounting in performance monitoring: a neurophysiological study of minorities under threatChad E Forbes
University of Arizona, Department of Psychology, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci 3:253-61. 2008....
Smearing the opposition: implicit and explicit stigmatization of the 2008 U.S. Presidential candidates and the current U.S. PresidentSpee Kosloff
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 0068, USA
J Exp Psychol Gen 139:383-98. 2010..Taken together, these findings suggest that, at both implicit and explicit cognitive levels, social category differences and political allegiance contribute to acceptance of smears against political candidates...
Vicarious retribution: the role of collective blame in intergroup aggressionBrian Lickel
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA
Pers Soc Psychol Rev 10:372-90. 2006..We conclude by considering a variety of conflict reduction strategies in light of this new theoretical framework...
Knowing is half the battle: teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women's math performanceMichael Johns
Department of Psychology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA
Psychol Sci 16:175-9. 2005..The results suggest that teaching about stereotype threat might offer a practical means of reducing its detrimental effects...
Perceiving personal discrimination: the role of group status and legitimizing ideologyBrenda Major
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara 93106, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 82:269-82. 2002..Results from 3 studies using 2 different methodologies provide support for this hypothesis among members of different high-status (European Americans and men) and low-status (African Americans, Latino Americans, and women) groups...
A case of collective responsibility: who else was to blame for the Columbine high school shootings?Brian Lickel
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90089, USA
Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29:194-204. 2003..Future directions in collective responsibility research are discussed...
Killing begets killing: evidence from a bug-killing paradigm that initial killing fuels subsequent killingAndy Martens
Department of Psychology, University of Canterbury, New Zealand
Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33:1251-64. 2007..In Study 3, after greater initial killing, more subsequent self-paced killing led to more favorable affective change. Implications for understanding lethal human violence are discussed...
Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: the role of anger, shame, and guiltAarti Iyer
School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, England
Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33:572-87. 2007..Guilt did not independently predict any political action intentions. Implications for the study of political action and emotions in intergroup contexts are discussed...
