Research Topics
| Etta PisanoSummaryAffiliation: University of North Carolina Country: USA Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film displayEtta D Pisano
Dept of Radiology, Univ of North Carolina School of Med, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
Radiology 223:483-8. 2002..To compare the speed and accuracy of the interpretations of digital mammograms by radiologists by using printed-film versus soft-copy display...
Cancer cases from ACRIN digital mammographic imaging screening trial: radiologist analysis with use of a logistic regression modelEtta D Pisano
Dept of Radiology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 4030 Bondurant Hall, Campus Box 7000, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7515, USA
Radiology 252:348-57. 2009..To determine which factors contributed to the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (DMIST) cancer detection results...
Issues to consider in converting to digital mammographyEtta D Pisano
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB 7000, Room 4030 Bondurant Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
Radiol Clin North Am 45:813-30, vi. 2007..These issues include technical matters regarding image display, storage, and retrieval as well as clinical and ergonomic considerations...
Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMISTEtta D Pisano
Department of Radiology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
Radiology 246:376-83. 2008....
Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screeningEtta D Pisano
Department of Radiology, the Biomedical Research Imaging Center, and the Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, USA
N Engl J Med 353:1773-83. 2005..Film mammography has limited sensitivity for the detection of breast cancer in women with radiographically dense breasts. We assessed whether the use of digital mammography would avoid some of these limitations...
American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodologyEtta D Pisano
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Radiology 236:404-12. 2005....
Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development GroupE D Pisano
Dept of Radiology, University of North Carolina CB7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
Radiology 216:820-30. 2000..To determine the preferences of radiologists among eight different image processing algorithms applied to digital mammograms obtained for screening and diagnostic imaging tasks...
Issues in breast cancer screeningEtta Pisano
University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, 7510 Room 503, Old Infirmary Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27514, USA
Technol Cancer Res Treat 4:5-9. 2005..While mammography is not perfect, it has set a high threshold that other modalities must reach before they will be widely utilized for screening or diagnosis...
Added cancer yield of MRI in screening the contralateral breast of women recently diagnosed with breast cancer: results from the International Breast Magnetic Resonance Consortium (IBMC) trialConstance D Lehman
Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA
J Surg Oncol 92:9-15; discussion 15-6. 2005..To estimate the added cancer yield of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) over mammography in the contralateral breast of patients with a recent diagnosis of breast cancer...
Radiologist evaluation of an X-ray tube-based diffraction-enhanced imaging prototype using full-thickness breast specimensLaura Faulconer
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7000, 4030 Bondurant Hall, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Acad Radiol 16:1329-37. 2009..However, a lingering drawback to the clinical translation of DEI has been the requirement for synchrotron radiation...
Consensus review: A method of assessment of calcifications that appropriately undergo a six-month follow-upCherie M Kuzmiak
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Acad Radiol 13:621-9. 2006..The purpose of this study is to determine if consensus characterization of calcifications by two breast imaging experts using standardized criteria can establish that follow-up is a safe option...
Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with mammography and magnetic resonance imagingConstance D Lehman
Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington 98109 1023, USA
Cancer 103:1898-905. 2005..The authors compared the performance of screening mammography versus magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in women at genetically high risk for breast cancer...
Augmented reality guidance for needle biopsies: an initial randomized, controlled trial in phantomsMichael Rosenthal
Department of Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 3175, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 3175, USA
Med Image Anal 6:313-20. 2002..48 mm for control versus 1.62 mm for augmented reality, p<0.02). This result suggests that AR systems can offer improved accuracy over traditional biopsy guidance methods...
Effect of display luminance on the feature detection rates of masses in mammogramsB M Hemminger
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina 27599 7515, USA
Med Phys 26:2266-72. 1999..However, the performance of the lower luminance display systems (less than 300 cd/m2), may be reduced due to the high levels of ambient light found in many reading environments...
Improving the detection of simulated masses in mammograms through two different image-processing techniquesB M Hemminger
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7510, USA
Acad Radiol 8:845-55. 2001..CONCLUSION: HIW should be tested in clinical images to determine whether the detection of masses by radiologists can be improved. CLAHE processing will probably not improve the detection of masses on clinical mammograms...
What every surgical oncologist should know about digital mammographyE D Pisano
Department of Radiology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
Semin Surg Oncol 20:181-6. 2001..Future technological developments, including improvements in softcopy display, image processing, computer-aided detection and diagnosis (CADD), tomosynthesis, and digital subtraction mammography (DSM), are briefly discussed...
Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions in a multicenter clinical trial: results from the radiologic diagnostic oncology group VE D Pisano
Dept of Radiology, Univ of North Carolina, 101 Manning Dr, 515 Old Infirmary, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
Radiology 219:785-92. 2001..To determine the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasonographically (US) and stereotactically guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the diagnosis of nonpalpable breast lesions...
Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essayE D Pisano
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514 4226, USA
Radiographics 20:1479-91. 2000..Trex processing allows visualization of both lesion detail and breast edge information but reduces image contrast...
Human breast cancer specimens: diffraction-enhanced imaging with histologic correlation--improved conspicuity of lesion detail compared with digital radiographyE D Pisano
Department of Radiology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27599 7510, USA
Radiology 214:895-901. 2000..Six of the seven cases (86%) showed enhanced visibility of surface spiculation that correlated with histopathologic information, including extension of tumor into surrounding tissue...
Cortisol levels and responses to mammography screening in breast cancer survivors: a pilot studyLaura S Porter
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Psychosom Med 65:842-8. 2003..The purpose of this study was to compare baseline levels of salivary cortisol, diurnal cortisol slopes, and cortisol reactivity to a mammogram in breast cancer survivors and women without a history of cancer...
Rosai-Dorfman disease presenting as a suspicious breast massCherie M Kuzmiak
University of North Carolina, School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27599, USA
AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1740-2. 2003
Factors affecting phantom scores at annual mammography facility inspections by the U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationE D Pisano
Department of Radiology, and the UNC-Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill 27599-7510, USA
Acad Radiol 8:864-70. 2001..Radiologists should also consider increasing phantom and clinical image optical density to allow for improved phantom testing outcomes...
Perspective on digital mammographyE D Pisano
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Semin Roentgenol 36:195-200. 2001....
Digital mammography image quality: image displayEliot Siegel
University of Maryland, Department of Radiology, Baltimore, MD, USA
J Am Coll Radiol 3:615-27. 2006....
Storage, transmission, and retrieval of digital mammography, including recommendations on image compressionDavid Avrin
University of Utah, Department of Radiology, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
J Am Coll Radiol 3:609-14. 2006....
Image quality in digital mammography: image acquisitionMark B Williams
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908 1339, USA
J Am Coll Radiol 3:589-608. 2006....
Should FDG PET be used to decide whether a patient with an abnormal mammogram or breast finding at physical examination should undergo biopsy?David J Samson
Technology Evaluation Center, Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association, Washington, DC 20005, USA
Acad Radiol 9:773-83. 2002....
MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancerConstance D Lehman
University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
N Engl J Med 356:1295-303. 2007....
Digital mammography: what next?Etta D Pisano
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Radiology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
J Am Coll Radiol 3:583-5. 2006
Choosing a specialty in medicine: female medical students and radiologyJulia R Fielding
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 101 Manning Dr, Campus Box 7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:897-900. 2007..The purpose of this study was to determine whether there are identifiable factors that dissuade female medical students from entering the field of radiology...
The positive predictive value for diagnosis of breast cancer full-field digital mammography versus film-screen mammography in the diagnostic mammographic populationBo Kyoung Seo
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Korea University School of Medicine, Ansan, Korea
Acad Radiol 13:1229-35. 2006..005). CONCLUSION: There is no improvement in PPV for the diagnosis of breast cancer with full-field digital mammography compared with film-screen mammography in a large diagnostic population...
Correlation of HER-2/neu overexpression with mammography and age distribution in primary breast carcinomasBo Kyoung Seo
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Korea University, 516 Kozan 1 dong, Danwon gu, Ansan, Kyungki Do 425 707, Korea
Acad Radiol 13:1211-8. 2006..The objective of this study was to determine the mammographic and patient characteristics (age) that correlate with HER-2/neu overexpression in primary breast carcinoma...
Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trialMartin J Yaffe
Imaging Research Program, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
Med Phys 33:737-52. 2006....
Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part IAili K Bloomquist
Imaging Research Program, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
Med Phys 33:719-36. 2006..Because of the relatively short duration of this study further, investigation of the long-term failure characteristics of these systems is advisable...
Comparison of three methods to increase knowledge about breast cancer and breast cancer screening in screening mammography patientsDag Pavic
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
Acad Radiol 14:553-60. 2007..The specific aim of the study was to determine which of several cost-effective interventions is best able to improve the breast cancer knowledge of women who present for screening mammography...
Two-modality mammography may confer an advantage over either full-field digital mammography or screen-film mammographyDeborah H Glueck
Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA
Acad Radiol 14:670-6. 2007....
Research for North Carolina: The University Cancer Research FundMichael S O'Malley
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
N C Med J 69:299-302. 2008..We embrace that opportunity and that responsibility and pledge ourselves to our shared vision of a better future for the citizens of North Carolina...
DMIST results: technologic or observer variability?Daniel B Kopans
Radiology 248:703; author reply 703. 2008
A limitation of ACRIN DMISTGordon L Hixson
Radiology 248:702; author reply 702-3. 2008
Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancerWendie A Berg
American Radiology Services Inc, Johns Hopkins Green Spring, Lutherville, Maryland, USA
JAMA 299:2151-63. 2008..Screening ultrasound may depict small, node-negative breast cancers not seen on mammography...
Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader studyR Edward Hendrick
Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Ctr and Dept of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Univ, Galter Pavilion, 13th Floor, 251 E Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Radiology 247:38-48. 2008....
Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screeningAnna N A Tosteson
The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, USA
Ann Intern Med 148:1-10. 2008....
A comparative study of mobile electronic data entry systems for clinical trials data collectionElodia Cole
University of North Carolina, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, CB 7515, Radiology Research Labs, 106 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Int J Med Inform 75:722-9. 2006..To determine the speed, accuracy, ease of use, and user satisfaction of various electronic data entry platforms for use in the collection of mammography clinical trials data...
Should breast imaging practices convert to digital mammography? A response from members of the DMIST Executive CommitteeEtta D Pisano
Radiology 245:12-3. 2007
Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening studyConstance D Lehman
Department of Radiology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, 825 Eastlake Ave E, G3 200, Seattle, WA 98109 1023, USA
Radiology 244:381-8. 2007..To prospectively determine cancer yield, callback and biopsy rates, and positive predictive value (PPV) of mammography, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and ultrasonography (US) in women at high risk for breast cancer...
Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveysCherie M Kuzmiak
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
Acad Radiol 14:685-91. 2007..S. Food and Drug Administration Mammography Quality Standards Act inspections of mammography equipment in North Carolina from 2002 through 2005...
Comparison of calcification specificity in digital mammography using soft-copy display versus screen-film mammographyHak Hee Kim
Department of Radiology, University of Ulsan, Asan Medical Center, 388-1, Seoul 138-736, South Korea
AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:47-50. 2006..CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was shown in specificity achievable using soft-copy digital versus screen-film mammography in this study...
Diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in patients with dense breasts who underwent problem-solving mammography: effects of image processing and lesion typeElodia B Cole
Department of Radiology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7510, USA
Radiology 226:153-60. 2003..CONCLUSION: Findings in this study indicate that radiologist's interpretation accuracy in interpreting digital mammograms depends on lesion type. Interpretation accuracy was not influenced by the image-processing method...
Congressional update: Report from the Biomedical Imaging Program of the National Cancer Institute. American College of Radiology Imaging Network: The digital mammographic imaging screening trial--an updateBarbara Galen
Biomedical Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20892-7440, USA
Acad Radiol 9:374-5. 2002
Digital mammographyEtta D Pisano
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Engineering and UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, 515 Old Infirmary, CB 7510, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Radiology 234:353-62. 2005..In addition, several potentially useful applications that are being developed with digital mammography will be described...
Factors predicting successful needle-localized breast biopsyPage E Abrahamson
Department of Epidemiology, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Acad Radiol 10:601-6. 2003..02), and decreased specimen volume (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Needle localization wires should be placed within 5 mm of mammographically visible lesions to increase the probability of successful lesion excision...
The role of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and management of breast cancerDag Pavic
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Medical School, CB 7510, 101 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Technol Cancer Res Treat 3:527-41. 2004..Its potential benefit in screening high-risk women has yet to be established with prospective studies, particularly with regard to false positive results...
Improved image contrast of calcifications in breast tissue specimens using diffraction enhanced imagingMiklos Z Kiss
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
Phys Med Biol 49:3427-39. 2004..5 for all calcifications. This improved image contrast for even near-pixel-size calcifications suggests potential utility for DEI in breast imaging...
Diagnostic accuracy of Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography versus screen-film mammography in a diagnostic mammography populationElodia Cole
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill 106 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
Acad Radiol 11:879-86. 2004..To compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Fischer Senoscan Digital Mammography System with that of standard screen-film mammography in a population of women presenting for screening or diagnostic mammography...
Online annotation tool for digital mammographyYuanshui Zheng
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7515, RRL MRI Building, 106 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27759, USA
Acad Radiol 11:566-72. 2004..To develop a software tool for radiologists to annotate mammograms online...
Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveysEtta D Pisano
Department of Radiology and Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB 7510 Manning Dr, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
Acad Radiol 11:536-43. 2004..To determine which factors affected the increase in average glandular dose recorded at the annual US Food and Drug Administration Mammography Quality Standards Act inspections of mammography equipment in North Carolina from 1997 to 2001...
Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V studyLaurie L Fajardo
Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Acad Radiol 11:293-308. 2004..6, 98.5, and 98.9 respectively for SCB). CONCLUSION: Percutaneous, imaged-guided core breast biopsy is an accurate diagnostic alternative to surgical biopsy in women with mammographically detected suspicious breast lesions...
Diagnostic agreement in the evaluation of image-guided breast core needle biopsies: results from a randomized clinical trialLaura C Collins
Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Am J Surg Pathol 28:126-31. 2004..89, 95% confidence interval 0.86-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: The level of diagnostic agreement in interpretation of breast CNB is extremely high among pathologists and is comparable to that seen for open surgical biopsy...
Low-dose multidetector dynamic CT in the breast: preliminary studyBo Kyoung Seo
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Konkuk University Hospital, 1 Whayang dong, Kwangjin gu, Seoul 143 914, South Korea
Clin Imaging 29:172-8. 2005..In breast cancers, low-dose dynamic CT could be used for the staging of breast cancer before surgery...
The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performanceElodia B Cole
Department of Radiology and Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, CB#7515, Radiology Research Labs, 106 Mason Farm Road, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Acad Radiol 12:585-95. 2005..CONCLUSION: Specific image-processing algorithms may be necessary for optimal presentation for interpretation based on machine and lesion type...
Diagnostic architectural and dynamic features at breast MR imaging: multicenter studyMitchell D Schnall
Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
Radiology 238:42-53. 2006..To prospectively determine the prevalence and predictive value of three-dimensional (3D) and dynamic breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and contrast material kinetic features alone and as part of predictive diagnostic models...
Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantomsCherie M Kuzmiak
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Old Infirmary Builiding, Room 513, CB#7510, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, USA
Med Phys 32:3144-50. 2005....
Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to diagnostic accuracy of lesion characterization in breast tissue biopsy specimensCherie M Kuzmiak
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Box 7510, Chapel Hill, NC, 27514, USA
Acad Radiol 9:1378-82. 2002..CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that with breast surgical specimens, FFDM is similar in diagnostic accuracy to screen-film mammography...
Estrogen-plus-progestin use and mammographic density in postmenopausal women: Women's Health Initiative randomized trialAnne McTiernan
Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98019, USA
J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1366-76. 2005..Increased mammographic density reduces the sensitivity of screening mammography, is associated with increased breast cancer risk, and may be hormone related. We assessed the effect of estrogen-plus-progestin therapy on mammographic density...
Ultrasound in the management of breast diseaseDag Pavic
Breast Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599, USA
Curr Womens Health Rep 3:156-64. 2003....
Prevention and early detection clinical trials: opportunities for primary care providers and their patientsLeslie G Ford
Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
CA Cancer J Clin 53:82-101. 2003....
Imaging and cancer: research strategy of the American College of Radiology Imaging NetworkDenise R Aberle
Department of Radiology of the University of California, Los Angeles, USA
Radiology 235:741-51. 2005..This article details ACRIN's research strategy according to disease site through the year 2007...
Pregnancy- and lactation-associated breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findingsBo Young Ahn
Department of Radiology, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, South Korea
J Ultrasound Med 22:491-7; quiz 498-9. 2003....
Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast prior to biopsyDavid A Bluemke
Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
JAMA 292:2735-42. 2004..Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been shown to have high sensitivity for cancer detection and is increasingly used following mammography to evaluate suspicious breast lesions...
MRI detection of distinct incidental cancer in women with primary breast cancer studied in IBMC 6883Mitchell D Schnall
Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA
J Surg Oncol 92:32-8. 2005..We report on the rate of MRI and mammography detection of foci of distinct incidental cancer in a prospective, multi center trial involving 426 women with confirmed breast cancer at 15 institutions in the US, Canada, and Germany...
Future directions in breast imagingMarcia Koomen
Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
J Clin Oncol 23:1674-7. 2005
A comparative study of 2D and 3D ultrasonography for evaluation of solid breast massesKyu Ran Cho
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Korea University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
Eur J Radiol 54:365-70. 2005..CONCLUSION: In spite of superior image quality on 3D ultrasonography, it does not provide additional benefits to diagnostic accuracy for diagnosis of breast cancer...
Does biopsy, aspiration or six-month follow-up of a false-positive mammogram reduce future screening or have large psychosocial effects?Beverly V Currence
Department of Radiology, Radiology Research Lab, CB 7515, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Acad Radiol 10:1257-66. 2003....
