Research Topics
| Gregory J MeyerSummaryAffiliation: University of Alaska Country: USA Publications
|
Detail Information
Publications
Amplifying issues related to psychological testing and assessmentGregory J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA
Am Psychol 57:140-1. 2002
The convergent validity of MMPI and Rorschach scales: an extension using profile scores to define response and character styles on both methods and a reexamination of simple Rorschach response frequencyG J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage USA
J Pers Assess 72:1-35. 1999..Implications are considered...
An examination of interrater reliability for scoring the Rorschach Comprehensive System in eight data setsGregory J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska, Anchorage 99508, USA
J Pers Assess 78:219-74. 2002..The CS can be scored reliably, but because scoring is the result of coder skills clinicians must conscientiously monitor their accuracy...
Exploring possible ethnic differences and bias in the Rorschach Comprehensive SystemGregory J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska, Anchorage 99508, USA
J Pers Assess 78:104-29. 2002..Although these findings need to be replicated, the available data support using the Comprehensive System across ethnic groups...
The hard science of Rorschach research: what do we know and where do we go?G J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508, USA
Psychol Assess 13:486-502. 2001....
Introduction to the final special section in the special series on the utility of the Rorschach for clinical assessmentG J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, Alaska 99508, USA
Psychol Assess 13:419-22. 2001..The Special Series provides clinicians, researchers, educators, and students with a thorough review of the evidence and logic that are critical for understanding the Rorschach's strengths and limitations in clinical assessment...
Psychological testing and psychological assessment. A review of evidence and issuesG J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage, 3211 Providence Drive, Anchorage, AK 99508, USA
Am Psychol 56:128-65. 2001..Future investigations should move beyond an examination of test scales to focus more on the role of psychologists who use tests as helpful tools to furnish patients and referral sources with professional consultation...
Superiority of form% over Lambda for research on the Rorschach Comprehensive SystemG J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage, 99508, USA
J Pers Assess 76:68-75. 2001..Because it is much more normally distributed, Form% is suitable to use in parametric analyses (e.g., t tests, analyses of variance, correlations, factor analyses, multiple regressions)...
On the science of Rorschach researchG J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage, USA
J Pers Assess 75:46-81. 2000..had seen the results from eight large samples, all of which demonstrated that their wrong formula had correlations greater than .998 with the correct formula. At worst, it seems that Wood et al. (199..
Incremental validity of the Rorschach Prognostic Rating Scale over the MMPI Ego Strength Scale and IQG J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage, USA
J Pers Assess 74:356-70. 2000..Contemporary Rorschach scales should continue to be evaluated for their distinctive and incremental contribution to clinical practice...
A replication of Rorschach and MMPI-2 convergent validityG J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Alaska Anchorage, USA
J Pers Assess 74:175-215. 2000..Remaining ambiguities and suggestions for further advances are discussed...
The invariant component structure of the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) full scalesJames B Hoelzle
Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, OH, USA
J Pers Assess 91:175-86. 2009..Using Morey's normative sample, we provide the formulas needed to compute T scores for each component so they can be used in clinical work with patients. We discuss clinical implications and directions for future PAI research...
A principal components analysis of Rorschach aggression and hostility variablesNicholas J Katko
Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, USA
J Pers Assess 92:594-8. 2010..We also offer suggestions for condensing the array of aggression-related measures to simplify Rorschach aggression scoring...
Toward international normative reference data for the comprehensive systemGregory J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
J Pers Assess 89:S201-16. 2007....
An examination of the construct validity of the Rorschach Mutuality of Autonomy (MOA) ScaleGeorge Bombel
Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, USA
J Pers Assess 91:227-37. 2009..Results suggest that the MOA Scale is an equally potent measure of OR and psychopathology regardless of the MOA Scale index used...
The factor structure of the MMPI-2 Restructured Clinical (RC) scalesJames B Hoelzle
Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
J Pers Assess 90:443-55. 2008..However, the RC and Content factors generally provided more efficient and logical markers of psychopathology than the Clinical and Content factors. We discuss interpretive considerations...
Impact of card rotation on the frequency of Rorschach reflection responsesSandra L Horn
Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606 3390, USA
J Pers Assess 91:346-56. 2009..The results imply reflections are in part a function of stimulus properties from viewing the card in a rotated orientation and not just the personal characteristics of the test taker...
The interrater reliability of Elizur's hostility systems and Holt's aggression variables: a meta-analytical reviewNicholas J Katko
Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606 3390, USA
J Pers Assess 91:357-64. 2009....
The interclinician reliability of Rorschach interpretation in four data setsGregory J Meyer
Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, OH 43606, USA
J Pers Assess 84:296-314. 2005..92) than with the judgments of other clinicians (range = .76 to .89). Compared to meta-analyses of interrater reliability in psychology and medicine, the findings indicate these clinicians could reliably interpret Rorschach CS data...
Introduction to the JPA special issue: Can the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual put the complex person back at the center-stage of personality assessment?Steven K Huprich
Department of Psychology, Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, 48197, USA
J Pers Assess 93:109-11. 2011..Overall, this special issue helps show how the PDM can invigorate multimethod personality assessment by placing the complex idiographic understanding of a person at the center-stage in the assessment process...
Correspondence among observer ratings of Rorschach, Big Five Model, and DSM-IV personality disorder constructsJoni L Mihura
Department of Psychology, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH 43606, USA
J Pers Assess 81:20-39. 2003..The first 2 factors received high loadings from RCS, PDQ-4+, and B5M variables. The sixth factor received high loadings from just RCS variables...
Introduction to the JPA special supplement on International Reference Samples for the Rorschach Comprehensive SystemThomas W Shaffer
Independent Practice, Fresno, CA, USA
J Pers Assess 89:S2-6. 2007..Reliability and coding concerns are addressed, and information on the Popular response in Japan are reviewed. Finally, trends within and across the data are highlighted...
A method to optimize the response range while maintaining Rorschach Comprehensive System validityKristin L Dean
Department of Clinical Psychology, California School of Professional Psychology at Alliant International University, USA
J Pers Assess 89:149-61. 2007..The findings have clinical implications for protocol administration with thought-disordered populations that typically produce brief records...
When effect sizes disagree: the case of r and dRobert E McGrath
School of Psychology, Fairleigh Dickinson University, Teaneck, NJ 07666, USA
Psychol Methods 11:386-401. 2006..Because neither statistic is universally superior, researchers should explicitly consider the importance of base rates to formulate correct inferences and justify the selection of a primary effect-size statistic...
Advancing personality assessment terminology: time to retire "objective" and "projective" as personality test descriptorsGregory J Meyer
J Pers Assess 87:223-5. 2006
Wanted: research on applied clinical judgment in personality assessmentGregory J Meyer
J Pers Assess 86:226-7. 2006
Construct validity of rorschach variables for alexithymiaPiero Porcelli
Psychosomatic Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Ospedale De Bellis, Castellana Grotte, Italy
Psychosomatics 43:360-9. 2002....
