Aarti Iyer

Summary

Affiliation: University of California
Country: USA

Publications

  1. ncbi White guilt and racial compensation: the benefits and limits of self-focus
    Aarti Iyer
    Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz 95064, USA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29:117-29. 2003
  2. ncbi Angry opposition to government redress: when the structurally advantaged perceive themselves as relatively deprived
    Colin Wayne Leach
    Department of Psychology, University of California Santa Cruz, CA, USA
    Br J Soc Psychol 46:191-204. 2007
  3. ncbi Affirmative action. Psychological data and the policy debates
    Faye J Crosby
    Department of Psychology, Social Sciences II, Room 277, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
    Am Psychol 58:93-115. 2003
  4. ncbi Understanding affirmative action
    Faye J Crosby
    Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
    Annu Rev Psychol 57:585-611. 2006
  5. ncbi Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action
    Colin Wayne Leach
    University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull 32:1232-45. 2006
  6. ncbi Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: the role of anger, shame, and guilt
    Aarti Iyer
    School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, England
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33:572-87. 2007

Detail Information

Publications6

  1. ncbi White guilt and racial compensation: the benefits and limits of self-focus
    Aarti Iyer
    Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz 95064, USA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29:117-29. 2003
    ..Our findings demonstrate the benefits and limits of group-based guilt as a basis of support for social equality and highlight the value of understanding the specific emotions elicited in intergroup contexts...
  2. ncbi Angry opposition to government redress: when the structurally advantaged perceive themselves as relatively deprived
    Colin Wayne Leach
    Department of Psychology, University of California Santa Cruz, CA, USA
    Br J Soc Psychol 46:191-204. 2007
    ..Theoretical and political implications are discussed...
  3. ncbi Affirmative action. Psychological data and the policy debates
    Faye J Crosby
    Department of Psychology, Social Sciences II, Room 277, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA
    Am Psychol 58:93-115. 2003
    ..The merit-based argument, grounded in empirical studies, concludes that the policy of affirmative action conforms to the American ideal of fairness and is a necessary policy...
  4. ncbi Understanding affirmative action
    Faye J Crosby
    Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
    Annu Rev Psychol 57:585-611. 2006
    ..We also review how psychologists have examined variations in people's attitudes toward affirmative action, in part as a means for testing different theories of social behavior...
  5. ncbi Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action
    Colin Wayne Leach
    University of California, Santa Cruz, USA
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull 32:1232-45. 2006
    ..Although guilt was associated with the abstract goal of systemic compensation, guilt did not explain willingness for political action. Results underline the importance of examining specific group-based emotions in intergroup relations...
  6. ncbi Why individuals protest the perceived transgressions of their country: the role of anger, shame, and guilt
    Aarti Iyer
    School of Psychology, University of Exeter, Exeter, England
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull 33:572-87. 2007
    ..Guilt did not independently predict any political action intentions. Implications for the study of political action and emotions in intergroup contexts are discussed...