Deborah H Glueck

Summary

Affiliation: University of Colorado Denver
Country: USA

Publications

  1. pmc Reducing decision errors in the paired comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests with Gaussian outcomes
    Brandy M Ringham
    Center for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2 125 CHS, Los Angeles CA 90095, USA
    BMC Med Res Methodol 14:37. 2014
  2. pmc Selecting a sample size for studies with repeated measures
    Yi Guo
    Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
    BMC Med Res Methodol 13:100. 2013
  3. pmc Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality
    Deborah H Glueck
    Department of Biostatistics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO, USA
    BMC Med Res Methodol 9:4. 2009
  4. pmc Breast cancer risk assessment in 64,659 women at a single high-volume mammography clinic
    John T Brinton
    Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, 13001 E 17th Place, Room W3125, Aurora, CO, USA
    Acad Radiol 19:95-9. 2012
  5. pmc Two-modality mammography may confer an advantage over either full-field digital mammography or screen-film mammography
    Deborah H Glueck
    Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA
    Acad Radiol 14:670-6. 2007
  6. pmc Estimates of sensitivity and specificity can be biased when reporting the results of the second test in a screening trial conducted in series
    Brandy M Ringham
    Department of Biostatistics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO, USA
    BMC Med Res Methodol 10:3. 2010
  7. pmc A likelihood model that accounts for censoring due to fetal loss can accurately test the effects of maternal and fetal genotype on the probability of miscarriage
    Colin I O'Donnell
    Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA
    Hum Hered 67:57-65. 2009

Detail Information

Publications7

  1. pmc Reducing decision errors in the paired comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests with Gaussian outcomes
    Brandy M Ringham
    Center for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2 125 CHS, Los Angeles CA 90095, USA
    BMC Med Res Methodol 14:37. 2014
    ..We propose a weighted maximum likelihood bias correction method to reduce decision errors...
  2. pmc Selecting a sample size for studies with repeated measures
    Yi Guo
    Department of Health Outcomes and Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA
    BMC Med Res Methodol 13:100. 2013
    ....
  3. pmc Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modality
    Deborah H Glueck
    Department of Biostatistics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO, USA
    BMC Med Res Methodol 9:4. 2009
    ..When only suspicious screening test scores trigger a sensitive and specific secondary test, the result is a form of partial verification bias...
  4. pmc Breast cancer risk assessment in 64,659 women at a single high-volume mammography clinic
    John T Brinton
    Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, 13001 E 17th Place, Room W3125, Aurora, CO, USA
    Acad Radiol 19:95-9. 2012
    ..This study provides preliminary information for a proposed follow-up study, including the proportion of women who completed the recommended MRI at the same clinic that had conducted the risk assessment...
  5. pmc Two-modality mammography may confer an advantage over either full-field digital mammography or screen-film mammography
    Deborah H Glueck
    Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA
    Acad Radiol 14:670-6. 2007
    ....
  6. pmc Estimates of sensitivity and specificity can be biased when reporting the results of the second test in a screening trial conducted in series
    Brandy M Ringham
    Department of Biostatistics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO, USA
    BMC Med Res Methodol 10:3. 2010
    ..The problem is further complicated when some cases are misclassified as non-cases due to incomplete disease status ascertainment...
  7. pmc A likelihood model that accounts for censoring due to fetal loss can accurately test the effects of maternal and fetal genotype on the probability of miscarriage
    Colin I O'Donnell
    Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA
    Hum Hered 67:57-65. 2009
    ..Censoring prevents use of published statistical methodology. We propose techniques to determine whether increases in miscarriage are due to the fetal genotype, maternal genotype, or both...