Michael Bunting

Summary

Affiliation: University of Maryland
Country: USA

Publications

  1. ncbi request reprint Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory
    Michael Bunting
    Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 32:183-96. 2006
  2. pmc How does running memory span work?
    Michael Bunting
    University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 59:1691-700. 2006
  3. ncbi request reprint The role of processing difficulty in the predictive utility of working memory span
    Michael Bunting
    University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA
    Psychon Bull Rev 13:998-1004. 2006
  4. pmc The deployment of attention in short-term memory tasks: trade-offs between immediate and delayed deployment
    Michael F Bunting
    University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA
    Mem Cognit 36:799-812. 2008
  5. pmc Working memory and flexibility in awareness and attention
    Michael F Bunting
    Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, 65211, USA
    Psychol Res 69:412-9. 2005
  6. ncbi request reprint Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm
    Jason M Watson
    Department of Psychology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63130 4899, USA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:76-85. 2005

Detail Information

Publications6

  1. ncbi request reprint Proactive interference and item similarity in working memory
    Michael Bunting
    Department of Psychology, University of Illinois, Chicago, IL, USA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 32:183-96. 2006
    ..These results are consistent with controlled attention and inhibition accounts of working memory, and they elucidate a fundamental component of working memory span tasks...
  2. pmc How does running memory span work?
    Michael Bunting
    University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 59:1691-700. 2006
    ..In two experiments, we examine the roles of these two strategies and the consequences of two types of interference...
  3. ncbi request reprint The role of processing difficulty in the predictive utility of working memory span
    Michael Bunting
    University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois, USA
    Psychon Bull Rev 13:998-1004. 2006
    ..OSPAN and PR correlated with RAPM when the processing component took executive attentional control. These results are suggestive of resource sharing between processing and storage...
  4. pmc The deployment of attention in short-term memory tasks: trade-offs between immediate and delayed deployment
    Michael F Bunting
    University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, USA
    Mem Cognit 36:799-812. 2008
    ..e., postcategorical phonological storage and/or precategorical sensory memory) may be retrieved and become the focus of attention for recall...
  5. pmc Working memory and flexibility in awareness and attention
    Michael F Bunting
    Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, 65211, USA
    Psychol Res 69:412-9. 2005
    ..These results are difficult to explain with passive storage alone and indicate that a processing difficulty impedes recall from working memory, presumably by distracting attention away from its storage function...
  6. ncbi request reprint Individual differences in susceptibility to false memory in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott paradigm
    Jason M Watson
    Department of Psychology, Washington University in St Louis, St Louis, MO 63130 4899, USA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 31:76-85. 2005
    ..These findings suggest that individual differences in WMC influence cognitive control and the ability to actively maintain task goals in the face of interfering information or habit...