- Reducing decision errors in the paired comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of screening tests with Gaussian outcomesBrandy M Ringham
Center for Cancer Prevention and Control Research, University of California, Los Angeles, 650 Charles Young Drive South, Room A2 125 CHS, Los Angeles CA 90095, USA
BMC Med Res Methodol 14:37. 2014..We propose a weighted maximum likelihood bias correction method to reduce decision errors...
- Breast cancer risk assessment in 64,659 women at a single high-volume mammography clinicJohn T Brinton
Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado Denver, 13001 E 17th Place, Room W3125, Aurora, CO, USA
Acad Radiol 19:95-9. 2012..This study provides preliminary information for a proposed follow-up study, including the proportion of women who completed the recommended MRI at the same clinic that had conducted the risk assessment...
- Bias in trials comparing paired continuous tests can cause researchers to choose the wrong screening modalityDeborah H Glueck
Department of Biostatistics, Colorado School of Public Health, University of Colorado, Denver, Aurora, CO, USA
BMC Med Res Methodol 9:4. 2009..When only suspicious screening test scores trigger a sensitive and specific secondary test, the result is a form of partial verification bias...