J J Arnett

Summary

Affiliation: University of Maryland
Country: USA

Publications

  1. ncbi Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered
    J J Arnett
    Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA
    Am Psychol 54:317-26. 1999
  2. ncbi Winston's "No Additives" campaign: "straight up"? "no bull"?
    J J Arnett
    Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA
    Public Health Rep 114:522-7. 1999
  3. ncbi Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties
    J J Arnett
    Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA
    Am Psychol 55:469-80. 2000
  4. ncbi Optimistic bias in adolescent and adult smokers and nonsmokers
    J J Arnett
    Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA
    Addict Behav 25:625-32. 2000
  5. ncbi Developmental sources of crash risk in young drivers
    J J Arnett
    Inj Prev 8:ii17-21; discussion ii21-3. 2002
  6. ncbi The psychology of globalization
    Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
    Am Psychol 57:774-83. 2002
  7. ncbi Talk is cheap: the tobacco companies' violations of their own cigarette advertising code
    Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
    University of Maryland, University Park, Maryland, USA
    J Health Commun 10:419-31. 2005
  8. ncbi The myth of peer influence in adolescent smoking initiation
    Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
    Clark University, Worchester, MA, USA
    Health Educ Behav 34:594-607. 2007

Detail Information

Publications8

  1. ncbi Adolescent storm and stress, reconsidered
    J J Arnett
    Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA
    Am Psychol 54:317-26. 1999
    ..Finally, although the general public is sometimes portrayed by scholars as having a stereotypical view of adolescent storm and stress, both scholars and the general public appear to support a modified storm-and-stress view...
  2. ncbi Winston's "No Additives" campaign: "straight up"? "no bull"?
    J J Arnett
    Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA
    Public Health Rep 114:522-7. 1999
    ..The author used data from a larger study to examine adolescents' and adults' responses to Winston cigarettes' "No Additives" advertising campaign...
  3. ncbi Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties
    J J Arnett
    Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA
    Am Psychol 55:469-80. 2000
    ....
  4. ncbi Optimistic bias in adolescent and adult smokers and nonsmokers
    J J Arnett
    Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, College Park 20742, USA
    Addict Behav 25:625-32. 2000
    ..Thus an optimistic bias regarding smoking risks appears to be held by both adolescent and adult smokers, especially by adolescents and especially regarding addiction. Implications for smoking prevention programs are discussed...
  5. ncbi Developmental sources of crash risk in young drivers
    J J Arnett
    Inj Prev 8:ii17-21; discussion ii21-3. 2002
    ..To outline various sources of crash risk among young drivers that are developmental (age based) factors...
  6. ncbi The psychology of globalization
    Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
    Am Psychol 57:774-83. 2002
    ....
  7. ncbi Talk is cheap: the tobacco companies' violations of their own cigarette advertising code
    Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
    University of Maryland, University Park, Maryland, USA
    J Health Commun 10:419-31. 2005
    ..Thus, despite their public pledge, the tobacco companies routinely violate a variety of aspects of the Cigarette Advertising and Promotion Code...
  8. ncbi The myth of peer influence in adolescent smoking initiation
    Jeffrey Jensen Arnett
    Clark University, Worchester, MA, USA
    Health Educ Behav 34:594-607. 2007
    ..Finally, a new model of the role of peers in smoking initiation is offered, with an emphasis on how adolescents' characteristics lead to the selection of their friends, who then provide a peer context that may or may not support smoking...