Research Topics
| C M MaSummaryAffiliation: Stanford University Country: USA Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Correction factors for water-proofing sleeves in kilovoltage x-ray beamsC M Ma
Institute for National Measurement Standards, National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Canada
Med Phys 24:1507-13. 1997..Measurements for PMMA, nylon and polystyrene sleeves of various thicknesses have also been carried out and show excellent agreement with Monte Carlo calculations...
Monte Carlo verification of IMRT dose distributions from a commercial treatment planning optimization systemC M Ma
Radiation Oncology Department, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA
Phys Med Biol 45:2483-95. 2000....
Study of dosimetry consistency for kilovoltage x-ray beamsC M Ma
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305 5105, USA
Med Phys 25:2376-84. 1998..To this end, measured depth ionization curves require depth-dependent correction factors...
Mass-energy absorption coefficient and backscatter factor ratios for kilovoltage x-ray beamsC M Ma
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305 5105, USA
Phys Med Biol 44:131-43. 1999..This means that the B factors for water may be directly used to convert the 'in-air' water kerma to surface kerma for human soft tissues...
Energy- and intensity-modulated electron beams for radiotherapyC M Ma
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305 5304, USA
Phys Med Biol 45:2293-311. 2000..To demonstrate the potential of MERT for target dose coverage and normal tissue sparing for treatment of superficial targets, treatment plans for a hypothetical treatment were compared using photon beams and MERT...
Clinical implementation of a Monte Carlo treatment planning systemC M Ma
Radiation Oncology Department, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305, USA
Med Phys 26:2133-43. 1999..Treatment sites showing the largest dose differences were for head and neck, lung, and breast cases...
Monte Carlo modelling of electron beams from medical acceleratorsC M Ma
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305 5304, USA
Phys Med Biol 44:R157-89. 1999..This paper summarizes work over the past two decades on Monte Carlo simulation of clinical electron beams from medical accelerators...
Dosimetric verification of IMRT treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulations for prostate cancerJ Yang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 50:869-78. 2005..These results suggest that heterogeneity correction should be used in dose calculation for prostate cancer with non-coplanar beam arrangements...
A particle track-repeating algorithm for proton beam dose calculationJ S Li
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 50:1001-10. 2005..The differences between them were within 2%. The new algorithm was about 13 times faster than the GEANT3 Monte Carlo code for a uniform phantom geometry and over 700 times faster for a heterogeneous phantom geometry...
Investigation of MR image distortion for radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancerZ Chen
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 51:1393-403. 2006..Using the point-by-point method, the geometrical distortion after the GDC were reduced to <3 mm for external contour determination and the effective FOV was expanded from 36 cm to 42 cm...
Effect of statistical uncertainties on Monte Carlo treatment planningC M Ma
Radiation Oncology Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 50:891-907. 2005..We provide practical guidelines for the clinical implementation of Monte Carlo treatment planning and show realistic examples of Monte Carlo based IMRT and MERT plans...
Shielding design for a laser-accelerated proton therapy systemJ Fan
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 52:3913-30. 2007..It is shown that the two-layer shielding design with 10-12 cm thick polyethylene and 4 cm thick lead can effectively absorb the unwanted particles to meet the shielding requirements...
Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated tangential beam irradiation for breast cancerJ S Li
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
Med Phys 31:1023-31. 2004..The IMRT technique has been proven practical for breast treatment clinically. The results showed that tangential IMRT improved the dose homogeneity in the breast and reduced the dose to the lung and heart...
Modelling of electron contamination in clinical photon beams for Monte Carlo dose calculationJ Yang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 191 11, USA
Phys Med Biol 49:2657-73. 2004..The Monte Carlo calculated dose distributions were compared with measured data. Our results showed good agreement (less than 2% or 2 mm) for 6, 10 and 18 MV photon beams...
Dosimetric advantages of IMPT over IMRT for laser-accelerated proton beamsW Luo
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 53:7151-66. 2008..Significant improvement in target dose uniformity and normal tissue sparing as well as in reduction of whole body dose can be achieved by IMPT with appropriate optimization and beam setup...
Dosimetric verification of modulated electron radiotherapy delivered using a photon multileaf collimator for intact breastsL Jin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 53:6009-25. 2008..We conclude that our in-house MC treatment planning system is capable of performing treatment planning and accurate dose calculations for MERT using the pMLC to deliver radiation therapy to the intact breast...
Optimization of combined electron and photon beams for breast cancerW Xiong
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 49:1973-89. 2004..It is concluded that combined photon and electron beam therapy may be advantageous for treating breast cancer compared to conventional treatment techniques using tangential wedged photon beams followed by a boost electron field...
Ultra-thin TLDs for skin dose determination in high energy photon beamsS Stathakis
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 51:3549-67. 2006..Knowing the dose received at the surface of the patient can lead to prediction of skin reactions helping with the design of new treatment techniques and alternative dose fractionation schemes...
Dosimetric evaluation of MRI-based treatment planning for prostate cancerL Chen
Radiation Oncology Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 49:5157-70. 2004..The difference in the target dose between CT- and MRI-based plans using homogeneous geometry was within 2.5%. Our results suggest that MRI-based treatment planning is suitable for radiotherapy of prostate cancer...
Intensity modulated radiation therapy using laser-accelerated protons: a Monte Carlo dosimetric studyE Fourkal
Radiation Oncology Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 7701 Borehole Avenue, Philadelphia 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 48:3977-4000. 2003..It is shown that for a two-beam arrangement (parallel-opposed) it is possible to achieve both superior target coverage with 5% dose inhomogeneity within the target and excellent sparing of surrounding tissue...
Particle selection for laser-accelerated proton therapy feasibility studyE Fourkal
Radiation Oncology Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
Med Phys 30:1660-70. 2003..The calculations presented in this article show that the dose rate that the selection system can yield is on the order of D=260 Gy/min for a field size of 1 x 1 cm2...
Photon beam characterization and modelling for Monte Carlo treatment planningJ Deng
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA
Phys Med Biol 45:411-27. 2000....
Validation of a Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiotherapy treatment planningJ S Li
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA
Phys Med Biol 45:2969-85. 2000..The agreement was within 1.0%. Our results demonstrate that MCDOSE is accurate and efficient for routine dose calculation in radiotherapy treatment planning, with or without beam modifiers...
The MLC tongue-and-groove effect on IMRT dose distributionsJ Deng
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA
Phys Med Biol 46:1039-60. 2001....
Electron beam modeling and commissioning for Monte Carlo treatment planningS B Jiang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305 5304, USA
Med Phys 27:180-91. 2000..This preliminary study has shown the capability of the commissioning approach for handling large variation in the electron incident energy. The possibility of making the approach more versatile is also discussed...
Monte Carlo based treatment planning for modulated electron beam radiation therapyM C Lee
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305 5304, USA
Phys Med Biol 46:2177-99. 2001..A homogeneous model target and a 2D breast plan are presented. The potential use of this tool in clinical planning is discussed...
Calculation of x-ray transmission through a multileaf collimatorY Chen
Radiation Oncology Department, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305 5304, USA
Med Phys 27:1717-26. 2000..This ray tracing calculation can be applied to the problem of verifying dynamic MLC leaf sequences as part of a patient-specific quality assurance process for IMRT...
Energy optimization procedure for treatment planning with laser-accelerated protonsE Fourkal
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
Med Phys 34:577-84. 2007....
A Monte Carlo dose calculation tool for radiotherapy treatment planningC M Ma
Radiation Oncology Department, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA
Phys Med Biol 47:1671-89. 2002..The effect of energy cut-offs for particle transport was investigated. Variance reduction techniques were implemented in MCDOSE to achieve a speedup factor of 10-30 compared to DOSXYZ...
Verification of IMRT dose distributions using a water beam imaging systemJ S Li
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305 5304, USA
Med Phys 28:2466-74. 2001..The proposed approach makes it possible to carry out a real-time comparison of the dose distribution in a transverse plane between the measurement and the reference when we do an IMRT dose verification...
Monte Carlo calculations of electron beam output factors for a medical linear acceleratorA Kapur
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305 5105, USA
Phys Med Biol 43:3479-94. 1998..This demonstrated that for the Varian Clinac 2100C linear accelerator, electron beam dose calculations in homogeneous water phantoms can be performed accurately at the 2% level using Monte Carlo simulations...
An optimized leaf-setting algorithm for beam intensity modulation using dynamic multileaf collimatorsL Ma
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, CA 94305 5105, USA
Phys Med Biol 43:1629-43. 1998..The algorithm is demonstrated to be applicable to both the 'step-and-shoot' and 'dynamic' type of beam delivery. The graphical interpretation and numerical implementation scheme of the algorithm is illustrated using a simplified example...
Derivation of electron and photon energy spectra from electron beam central axis depth dose curvesJ Deng
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA
Phys Med Biol 46:1429-49. 2001..We have implemented this method in the electron beam commissioning procedure for Monte Carlo electron beam dose calculations...
A quality assurance phantom for IMRT dose verificationC M Ma
Radiation Oncology Department, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
Phys Med Biol 48:561-72. 2003..The QA phantom has been integrated as a routine QA procedure for the patient's IMRT dose verification at Stanford since 1999...
Elongated beamlets: a simple technique for segment and MU reduction for sMLC IMRT delivery on accelerators utilizing 5 mm leaf widthsR A Price
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 50:N235-42. 2005..This technique directly translates to a decreased MSF(mod) allowing for decreased leakage dose to the patient, a decreased risk of exceeding secondary shielding limits in pre-existing vaults, and shorter treatment times...
Effect of patient variation on standard- and hypo-fractionated radiotherapy of prostate cancerW Xiong
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 50:1483-92. 2005..On the other hand, for lower alpha/beta ratios, the beta term also plays a more important role in cell-killing and therefore the patient variation parameter sigmabeta must be considered when designing a new dose fractionation scheme...
Removing the effect of statistical uncertainty on dose-volume histograms from Monte Carlo dose calculationsS B Jiang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305 5304, USA
Phys Med Biol 45:2151-61. 2000..The proposed approach is expected to be useful in removing the blurring effect on a quickly calculated Monte Carlo DVH when performing the iterative forward treatment planning...
Daily target localization for prostate patients based on 3D image correlationK Paskalev
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 49:931-9. 2004..The impact of image noise on the performance of the algorithm has been tested. The results show that the algorithm accurately adjusts for target positional changes even with Gaussian noise levels as high as 20% inserted...
Modeling the extrafocal radiation and monitor chamber backscatter for photon beam dose calculationS B Jiang
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305 5304, USA
Med Phys 28:55-66. 2001..The model will be particularly useful for IMRT dose calculations because it accurately predicts beam output and penumbra dose...
4D patient dose reconstruction using online measured EPID cine images for lung SBRT treatment validationMu Han Lin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Med Phys 39:5949-58. 2012..This study aims to develop an EPID-guided 4D patient dose reconstruction framework and to investigate its feasibility for lung SBRT treatment validation...
Investigation of pulsed low dose rate radiotherapy using dynamic arc delivery techniquesC M Ma
Radiation Oncology Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 57:4613-26. 2012..7 ± 4.0 cGy min⁻¹...
MR-guided pulsed high intensity focused ultrasound enhancement of docetaxel combined with radiotherapy for prostate cancer treatmentZhaomei Mu
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phys Med Biol 57:535-45. 2012....
Theoretical considerations of monitor unit calculations for intensity modulated beam treatment planningA Boyer
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305, USA
Med Phys 26:187-95. 1999..Experimental verification of the dose delivered by plans computed with the methodology demonstrated an agreement of better than 4% between the dose model and measurements...
Shielding evaluation for IMRT implementation in an existing accelerator vaultR A Price
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 7701 Burholme Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
J Appl Clin Med Phys 4:231-8. 2003..6% when using the SMLC delivery technique and our measured modulation scaling factors. This compares with a previously published value of 1.6% for routine 3D CRT delivery on the Varian accelerator...
Comparison of RTP dose distributions in heterogeneous phantoms with the BEAM Monte Carlo simulation systemM Miften
Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA
J Appl Clin Med Phys 2:21-31. 2001..The Clarkson model overestimates the dose in lung by a maximum of 10% compared to BEAM. Dose comparisons suggest turning-off the effective path length inhomogeneity correction in the Clarkson model for lung treatments...
Quantitative study of focused ultrasound enhanced doxorubicin delivery to prostate tumor in vivo with MRI guidanceXiaoming Chen
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Med Phys 39:2780-6. 2012..The purpose of this study was to investigate the potential of MR-guided pulsed focused ultrasound (pFUS) for the enhancement of drug uptake in prostate tumors in vivo using doxorubicin (Dox)...
Stopping-power ratios for clinical electron beams from a scatter-foil linear acceleratorA Kapur
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305, USA
Phys Med Biol 44:2321-41. 1999..5% of the Monte Carlo derived values for all the detector materials studied...
Dosimetric investigation of high dose rate, gated IMRTTeh Lin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
Med Phys 35:5079-87. 2008..Nonetheless, for the concern of patient care and safety, a patient specific QA should be performed as usual for IMRT plans for high dose rate deliveries...
Investigation of optimal beam margins for stereotactic radiotherapy of lung-cancer using Monte Carlo dose calculationsL Jin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 52:3549-61. 2007..The impact of the number of beam angles on the relationship between V20 and the beam margin was assessed. Quantitative information about optimal beam margins for lung-cancer SBRT was obtained for clinical applications...
Monitor unit calculation for Monte Carlo treatment planningC M Ma
Radiation Oncology Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 49:1671-87. 2004..It is also used for absolute dose calculations using Monte Carlo simulations for treatment verification, which has become part of our comprehensive IMRT quality assurance programme...
Monte Carlo and experimental investigations of multileaf collimated electron beams for modulated electron radiation therapyM C Lee
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, California 94305 5304, USA
Med Phys 27:2708-18. 2000..These improvements were also seen in isodose curves when a complex field shape was simulated. It is thus concluded that an MLC specific for electron beam collimation is required for MERT...
Lens dose in MLC-based IMRT treatments of the head and neckTodd Pawlicki
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 5487, USA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:293-9. 2004....
Dose correlation for thoracic motion in radiation therapy of breast cancerMeisong Ding
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
Med Phys 30:2520-9. 2003..The final dose distribution is reconstructed from the dose data at different breathing phases based on patient's breathing pattern associated with chest wall movements...
Particle in cell simulation of laser-accelerated proton beams for radiation therapyE Fourkal
Radiation Oncology Department, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111, USA
Med Phys 29:2788-98. 2002..Because of the broad energy and angular spectra of the protons, a compact particle selection and beam collimation system will be needed to generate small beams of polyenergetic protons for intensity modulated proton therapy...
Linear energy transfer of proton clustersE Fourkal
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 56:3123-36. 2011..As a result, the elevated radio biological effectiveness of the proton cluster may take place and conditions for its experimental observation are presented...
The dosimetric impact of dental implants on head-and-neck volumetric modulated arc therapyMu Han Lin
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Phys Med Biol 58:1027-40. 2013..We demonstrated that it was effective to use the material's electron-density ratio to account for the dosimetric impact of the dental implant...
The management of imaging dose during image-guided radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Task Group 75Martin J Murphy
Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA
Med Phys 34:4041-63. 2007..The end goal is to enable the design of image guidance regimens that are as effective and efficient as possible...
Monte Carlo simulation for MLC-based intensity-modulated radiotherapyT Pawlicki
Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA 94305 5304, USA
Med Dosim 26:157-68. 2001..It is currently in the process of being implemented by various treatment planning vendors and will be available for clinical use in the immediate future...
Impact of pelvic nodal irradiation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy on treatment of prostate cancerRobert A Price
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 66:583-92. 2006..The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of treating the pelvic lymphatic regions during prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with respect to our routine acceptance criteria...
MR-guided focused ultrasound: enhancement of intratumoral uptake of [³H]-docetaxel in vivoLili Chen
Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA
Phys Med Biol 55:7399-410. 2010..Our data showed increased (³H-docetaxel concentration in the tumor in the MRgFUS-treated group (1079 ± 132 cmp/75 mg) versus those without MRgFUS treatment (524 ± 201 cmp/75 mg) with P = 0.037...
