Research Topics
| J M DarleySummaryAffiliation: Princeton University Country: USA Publications
|
Detail Information
Publications
Incapacitation and just deserts as motives for punishmentJ M Darley
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, New Jersey 08544, USA
Law Hum Behav 24:659-83. 2000....- The psychology of compensatory and retributive justiceJohn M Darley
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, NJ 08544, USA
Pers Soc Psychol Rev 7:324-36. 2003..Theory about the exact nature of the emotional reactions is considered, along with suggestions for directions for future research... - Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishmentKevin M Carlsmith
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, New Jersey 08544, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 83:284-99. 2002..Study 3 (N = 351) revealed that despite strongly stated preferences for deterrence theory, individual sentencing decisions seemed driven exclusively by just deserts concerns... - An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgmentJ D Greene
Center for the Study of Brain, Mind, and Behavior, Department of Philosophy, 1879 Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Science 293:2105-8. 2001..These results may shed light on some puzzling patterns in moral judgment observed by contemporary philosophers... - The psychology of meta-ethics: exploring objectivismGeoffrey P Goodwin
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Cognition 106:1339-66. 2008..The results shed light on the nature of ethical belief, and have implications for the resolution of ethical disputes... - Crowded minds: the implicit bystander effectStephen M Garcia
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, New Jersey 08544 1010, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 83:843-53. 2002..Implications for social group research and the priming methodology are discussed... - Transgression wrongfulness outweighs its harmfulness as a determinant of sentence severityAdam L Alter
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Green Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Law Hum Behav 31:319-35. 2007..We also consider the theoretical and practical implications of these findings for sentencing laws and policy... - The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgmentJoshua D Greene
Department of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
Neuron 44:389-400. 2004..We speculate that the controversy surrounding utilitarian moral philosophy reflects an underlying tension between competing subsystems in the brain... - Identification, situational constraint, and social cognition: studies in the attribution of moral responsibilityRobert L Woolfolk
Department of Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA
Cognition 100:283-301. 2006..It would appear that laypersons' judgments of moral responsibility may, in some circumstances, accord with philosophical views in which freedom and determinism are regarded to be compatible... - Community attitudes on the family of issues surrounding the death of terminal patientsJ M Darley
Psychology Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA
J Soc Issues 52:85-104. 1996..Respondent attitudes toward euthanasia predicted recommendations in the expected directions. We suggest that there is less dissent on the issues that arise for medical treatments at the end of life than has been widely assumed... - Community perceptions of allowable counterforce in self-defense and defense of propertyK C Oleson
Department of Psychology, Reed College, Portland, Oregon 97202, USA
Law Hum Behav 23:629-51. 1999..We consider implications of these results for legal codes... - Casuistry and social category biasMichael I Norton
Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 87:817-31. 2004....