Research Topics
| B H GraysonSummaryAffiliation: New York University Country: USA Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction: clinical experienceJoseph G McCarthy
Variety Center for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 112:1239-46. 2003..The outer limit of the time window in which molding is effective remains to be defined...
The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of unilateral mandibular distractionWojciech Dec
Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 121:2084-92; discussion 2093-4. 2008..Mandibular distraction osteogenesis can be used to augment the hypoplastic skeleton and improve facial symmetry. The aim of this study was to determine how the vector of unilateral mandibular distraction affects treatment outcomes...- Development of a device for the delivery of agents to bone during distraction osteogenesisB H Grayson
Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, NYU Medical Center, 560 First Avenue, New York, New York 10016, USA
J Craniofac Surg 12:19-25. 2001..e., mitogens) in an attempt to alter this process and also substances (i.e., chemotherapy, antibiotics, etc.) for use in the treatment of various osteopathies... - Presurgical nasoalveolar orthopedic molding in primary correction of the nose, lip, and alveolus of infants born with unilateral and bilateral cleftsB H Grayson
Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery at New York University Medical Center, New York 10016, USA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:193-8. 2001..A close comparison of the proposed benefits of earlier forms of presurgical orthopedics, along with those of the current technique of nasoalveolar molding, is presented... - Nasoalveolar molding for infants born with clefts of the lip, alveolus, and palateBarry H Grayson
Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016, USA
Clin Plast Surg 31:149-58, vii. 2004..Preservation of these presurgical changes is achieved through the coordinated and modified surgical technique of the primary cleft repair... - Single-follicular-unit hair transplantation to correct cleft lip moustache alopeciaM L Reed
Clinical Dermatology, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10021, USA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J 38:538-40. 2001..Increased awareness is needed to incorporate follicular-unit graft hair transplant surgery into the family of corrective surgery subspecialties... - Removal of mandibular tooth follicles before distraction osteogenesisEran Regev
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Hadassah, Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1910-5. 2004..The described procedure has minimal morbidity and has resulted in successful subsequent distraction. The advantages, disadvantages, and cost-benefit issues are discussed... - Long-term stability and growth following unilateral mandibular distraction in growing children with craniofacial microsomiaPradip R Shetye
Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 118:985-95. 2006..Facial asymmetry is significantly improved after distraction, and despite mild relapse observed during the first year, surgical correction is stable in the later years of follow-up... - Comparison of skeletal and soft-tissue changes following unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesisAyse T Altug-Atac
Department of Orthodontics, Ankara University, School of Dentistry, Turkey
Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1751-9. 2008..The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between soft-tissue and underlying skeletal structures before and after unilateral mandibular distraction osteogenesis... - Nasoalveolar molding improves appearance of children with bilateral cleft lip-cleft palateCatherine T H Lee
Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY 10022, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1131-7. 2008..The authors compared nasal outcomes of cleft patients treated with banked fork flaps to those of patients who underwent nasoalveolar molding and primary retrograde nasal reconstruction... - Cephalometric analysis of the consolidation phase following bilateral pediatric mandibular distractionRichard A Hopper
Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J 40:233-40. 2003..Multicenter use of this cephalometric technique would help to identify potential risk factors associated with postactivation changes... - Nasoalveolar molding and gingivoperiosteoplasty versus alveolar bone graft: an outcome analysis of costs in the treatment of unilateral cleft alveolusTracy M Pfeifer
Manhattan Eye, Ear and Throat, New York, New York, USA
Cleft Palate Craniofac J 39:26-9. 2002..CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of unilateral cleft alveolus by nasoalveolar molding and gingivoperiosteoplasty results in substantial cost savings, compared with treatment by secondary alveolar bone graft... - Long-term outcome study of bilateral mandibular distraction: a comparison of Treacher Collins and Nager syndromes to other types of micrognathiaEric J Stelnicki
Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1819-25; discussion 1826-7. 2002.... - The importance of vector selection in preoperative planning of bilateral mandibular distractionBruno L Vendittelli
Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, NY 10016, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 122:1144-53. 2008..This study was designed to test this hypothesis... - The first decade of mandibular distraction: lessons we have learnedJoseph G McCarthy
Variety Center for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, 560 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1704-13. 2002 - Volumetric change of the medial pterygoid following distraction osteogenesis of the mandible: an example of the associated soft-tissue changesRichard J Mackool
Variety Center for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, NY 10016, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1804-7. 2003..Results of this study demonstrate that distraction osteogenesis of the human mandible not only lengthens deficient bone, but it also increases the volume of the attached musculature... - Moulding of the generate to control open bite during mandibular distraction osteogenesisTimo Peltomaki
Department of Oral Development and Orthodontics, Institute of Dentistry, University of Turku, Finland
Eur J Orthod 24:639-45. 2002..Intrusive mechanics may be incorporated into the orthodontic appliances to balance extrusive force by the moulding elastics... - A virtual reality tracking system for distal mandible movement during distraction osteogenesisRichard A Hopper
Craniofacial Center, Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 117:590-4; discussion 595. 2006 - Molding of the regenerate in mandibular distraction: Part 1: Laboratory studyJohnathan S Luchs
Variety Center for Craniofacial Rehabilitation, Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, 560 First Avenue, New York, NY, USA
J Craniofac Surg 13:205-11. 2002.... - Success rate of gingivoperiosteoplasty with and without secondary bone grafts compared with secondary alveolar bone grafts aloneYuki Sato
Division of Orthodontics, Showa University Dental Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
Plast Reconstr Surg 121:1356-67; discussion 1368-9. 2008.... - Midterm follow-up of midface distraction for syndromic craniosynostosis: a clinical and cephalometric studyPradip R Shetye
Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York 10016, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 120:1621-32. 2007..The authors studied the effect of midface distraction on maxillary skeletal position and clinical appearance in patients with Crouzon, Pfeiffer, and Apert syndromes, and examined the stability of these changes at 1 year after distraction... - Bone deposition/generation with LeFort III (midface) distractionJohn N Jensen
Department of Plastic Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 119:298-307. 2007..It is essential to critically assess bone deposition in midface distraction. The aim of this study was to characterize the quality and volume of bone deposition at specific osteotomy sites following midface distraction... - Prepubertal midface growth in unilateral cleft lip and palate following alveolar molding and gingivoperiosteoplastyCatherine T H Lee
Craniofacial Unit, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
Cleft Palate Craniofac J 41:375-80. 2004..05). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that midface growth in sagittal or vertical planes (up to the age of 9 to 13 years) were not affected by presurgical alveolar molding and gingivoperiosteoplasty (Millard type)... - Volumetric assessment of the distracted human mandibleRichard J Mackool
Institute of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York 10016, USA
J Craniofac Surg 15:745-50; discussion 751. 2004..This study indicates that distraction not only creates new bone but distributes that bone through the remodeled mandible in an anatomical pattern similar to that of the preoperative bone... - Morphology and growth of the mandible in Crouzon, Apert, and Pfeiffer syndromesSean Boutros
Hermann Hospital and Hermann Children s Hospital Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
J Craniofac Surg 18:146-50. 2007..Consequently, the ramus appears torqued inward, forming a greater angle with the cranial base...