Research Topics
| Dave WendlerSummaryAffiliation: National Institutes of Health Country: USA Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Protecting subjects who cannot give consent: toward a better standard for "minimal" risksDavid Wendler
Unit on Vulnerable Populations, Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institute of Health, USA
Hastings Cent Rep 35:37-43. 2005..Such a standard appears likely to provide more stringent protections for these vulnerable populations...
The consent process for cadaveric organ procurement: how does it work? How can it be improved?D Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, Bldg 10, Room 1C118, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
JAMA 285:329-33. 2001..However, no data exist on OPOs' current consent practices...
Does the current consent process minimize the risks of genetics research?Dave Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 1156, USA
Am J Med Genet 113:258-62. 2002....
What research with stored samples teaches us about research with human subjectsDavid Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD, USA 20892
Bioethics 16:33-54. 2002..Based on this analysis, this paper describes a new model of research participation that is emerging, and considers its implications for clinical research...
Views of potential subjects toward proposed regulations for clinical research with adults unable to consentDave Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892 1156, USA
Am J Psychiatry 159:585-91. 2002..The authors' goal was to assess healthy individuals' attitudes toward five of the most prominent proposed safeguards regarding the consent process for research with adults unable to consent...
The debate over research on stored biological samples: what do sources think?Dave Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Arch Intern Med 162:1457-62. 2002..The debate over informed consent for research on stored biological samples has enormous scientific implications. Unfortunately, there are no data on individuals' attitudes regarding when their consent should be obtained for such research...
Consent for continuing research participation: what is it and when should it be obtained?Dave Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
IRB 24:1-6. 2002
One-time general consent for research on biological samples: is it compatible with the health insurance portability and accountability act?David Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Arch Intern Med 166:1449-52. 2006
Hematopoietic stem cell transplant research with pediatric donors: when can institutional review boards approve it?Jehanna M Peerzada
National Institutes of Health, Department of Clinical Bioethics, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Transplantation 81:1616-20. 2006..Transplant protocols that expose pediatric donors to more than minimal risk can be approved by the Secretary of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in a special category of pediatric research...
Does random treatment assignment cause harm to research participants?Cary P Gross
Section of General Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
PLoS Med 3:e188. 2006..We therefore performed a systematic review to quantify the differences in health outcomes between randomized trial participants and eligible non-participants...
Informed consent for research and authorization under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act Privacy Rule: an integrated approachDavid Shalowitz
NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
Ann Intern Med 144:685-8. 2006..Hence, consent forms that satisfy the U.S. federal regulations for human subjects research need only minimal additional text to also satisfy the authorization requirements under the HIPAA Privacy Rule...
Overcoming language barriers in medical careDavid Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Pediatr Blood Cancer 47:747. 2006
Research on stored biological samples: views of African American and White American cancer patientsRebecca D Pentz
Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30322, USA
Am J Med Genet A 140:733-9. 2006..These findings support the recommendation to offer individuals a simplified consent with a one-time binary choice whether to provide biological samples for future research...
One-time general consent for research on biological samplesDavid Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
BMJ 332:544-7. 2006
Informed consent: practices and views of investigators in a multinational clinical trialLindsay Sabik
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
IRB 27:13-8. 2005
Research advance directives: protection or obstacle?Palaniappan Muthappan
Department of Clinical Bioethics, NIH, Bldg 10, Rm 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Am J Psychiatry 162:2389-91. 2005..This study assessed how many adults completed a research advance directive and the preferences indicated on the completed forms...
Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research?David Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
PLoS Med 3:e19. 2006..It is widely claimed that racial and ethnic minorities, especially in the US, are less willing than non-minority individuals to participate in health research. Yet, there is a paucity of empirical data to substantiate this claim...
Post-trial access to tested interventions: the views of IRB/REC chair, investigators, and research participants in a multinational HIV/AIDS studyChristine Pace
Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Mayland 20892, USA
AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 22:837-41. 2006..IRB/REC chairs and researchers were less expansive both in who and how they thought a drug should be guaranteed...
Protecting communities in health research from exploitationSegun Gbadegesin
Department of Philosophy, Howard University, Washington, DC, USA
Bioethics 20:248-53. 2006..The present paper attempts to address these concerns by providing an analysis of community exploitation and, based on this analysis, determining what safeguards are needed to protect communities in health research against exploitation...
Minimal risk in pediatric researchDavid Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
J Pediatr 149:855-61. 2006
Debriefing and accountability in deceptive researchFranklin G Miller
Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
Kennedy Inst Ethics J 18:235-51. 2008..We also present recommendations concerning the discussion of deception in scientific articles reporting the results of research using deception...
Why patients continue to participate in clinical researchDavid Wendler
Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Arch Intern Med 168:1294-9. 2008..While some commentators argue that this process inappropriately exploits patient participants, there are few data available to evaluate this claim...
The ethics of phase 0 oncology trialsEmily Abdoler
Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda Maryland, USA
Clin Cancer Res 14:3692-7. 2008..To evaluate these concerns, this article considers relevant empirical data from phase 1 oncology trials and develops several recommendations regarding the conduct of phase 0 clinical trials in oncology...
Research benefits for hypothetical HIV vaccine trials: The views of Ugandans in the Rakai DistrictChristine Grady
Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
IRB 30:1-7. 2008
What should research participants understand to understand they are participants in research?David Wendler
NIH Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Bioethics 22:203-8. 2008....
Is it possible to protect pediatric research subjects without blocking appropriate research?David Wendler
Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Pediatr 152:467-70. 2008
Children's and their parents' views on facing research risks for the benefit of othersDavid Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bldg 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 162:9-14. 2008..To assess children's and parents' attitudes regarding pediatric research that poses minimal risk or a minor increase over minimal risk and does not offer the potential to benefit the child clinically...
Research involving wards of the state: protecting particularly vulnerable childrenSumeeta Varma
Department of Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
J Pediatr 152:9-14. 2008
How does the collection of genetic test results affect research participants?David Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Am J Med Genet A 143:1733-8. 2007..Investigators and IRBs should recognize these phenomena and address them in the design and conduct of studies which collect genetic information...
A standard for assessing the risks of pediatric research: pro and conDavid Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Pediatr 150:579-82. 2007
How should treatment decisions be made for incapacitated patients, and why?David I Shalowitz
National Institutes of Health Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
PLoS Med 4:e35. 2007
What is a "minor" increase over minimal risk?David Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Pediatr 147:575-8. 2005
The relevance of empirical research in bioethicsFranklin G Miller
Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892 1156, USA
Schizophr Bull 32:37-41. 2006..In order to examine the value and limitations of ethics-related empirical research, we discuss 3 case studies involving research with stored biological samples, placebo-controlled trials, and the idea of the therapeutic misconception...
Institutional review board practices regarding assent in pediatric researchAmy Whittle
Department of Clinical Bioethics National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-1156, USA
Pediatrics 113:1747-52. 2004..These data suggest that IRBs need guidance on how to implement the assent requirement in a way that provides appropriate protections for pediatric research subjects...
Assessing the ethics of ethics research: a case studyFranklin G Miller
Unit on Clinical Research, Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, USA
IRB 26:9-12. 2004
Deception in the pursuit of scienceDavid Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Arch Intern Med 164:597-600. 2004
What makes clinical research in developing countries ethical? The benchmarks of ethical researchEzekiel J Emanuel
Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 1156, USA
J Infect Dis 189:930-7. 2004
Assessing the ethical and practical wisdom of surrogate consent for living organ donationDavid Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
JAMA 291:732-5. 2004
Why we need legal standards for pediatric researchDavid Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
J Pediatr 144:150-3. 2004
How do institutional review boards apply the federal risk and benefit standards for pediatric research?Seema Shah
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
JAMA 291:476-82. 2004..Despite this reliance on IRBs, no data exist on how IRBs apply the risk and benefit categories for pediatric research...
A response to commentators on "Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research?"David Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health
Am J Bioeth 3:W37-W38. 2003
Should children decide whether they are enrolled in nonbeneficial research?David Wendler
National Institutes of Health
Am J Bioeth 3:1-7. 2003..These principles imply that the threshold for assent should be fixed at 14 years of age, and a dissent requirement should be adopted for all children in the context of nonbeneficial research...
Nonbeneficial research with individuals who cannot consent: is it ethically better to enroll healthy or affected individuals?David Wendler
Unit on Vulnerable Populations, Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
IRB 25:1-4. 2003
When do the federal regulations allow placebo-controlled trials in children?Franklin G Miller
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
J Pediatr 142:102-7. 2003
The standard of care debate: can research in developing countries be both ethical and responsive to those countries' health needs?David Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Building 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892
Am J Public Health 94:923-8. 2004....
Risk standards for pediatric research: rethinking the Grimes rulingDavid Wendler
Unit on Vulnerable Populations, Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
Kennedy Inst Ethics J 14:187-98. 2004....
Palliative care: a supportive adjunct to pediatric phase I clinical trials for anticancer agents?Connie M Ulrich
Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G Magnuson Clinical Center National Institutes of Health Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Pediatrics 114:852-5. 2004
Research on stored biological samples: the views of UgandansDavid Wendler
Unit on Vulnerable Populations, Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
IRB 27:1-5. 2005
Quantifying the federal minimal risk standard: implications for pediatric research without a prospect of direct benefitDavid Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
JAMA 294:826-32. 2005..These data also raise the question of whether the federal minimal risk standard may sometimes fail to provide sufficient protection for children, prompting the need to consider alternative standards...
Deception in research on the placebo effectFranklin G Miller
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
PLoS Med 2:e262. 2005
The quality of informed consent in a clinical research study in ThailandChristine Pace
Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G. Magnuson Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
IRB 27:9-17. 2005
Research with stored biological samples: what do research participants want?Donna T Chen
Department of Clinical Bioethics, Warren G Magnuson Clinical Center, and National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Arch Intern Med 165:652-5. 2005..Many believe consent for each future use is required to respect individuals. Others worry this approach may block important research...
Can we ensure that all research subjects give valid consent?David Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Arch Intern Med 164:2201-4. 2004..Future research should focus on developing a postdecision questionnaire that can be adapted to individual studies and used to assess the voluntariness and understanding of all research subjects...
Placebo research and the spirit of informed consentFranklin G Miller
Psychosom Med 67:678; author reply 678. 2005
Direct-to-consumer advertising and physician prescribingFranklin G Miller
JAMA 294:678; author reply 678-9. 2005
A family's request for complementary medicine after patient brain deathArthur Isak Applbaum
John F Kennedy School of Government and Edmond J Safra Foundation Center for Ethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
JAMA 299:2188-93. 2008..The present article reviews this case and discusses other cases that share key features to determine whether and when it is appropriate to accommodate requests for interventions on patients who have been declared dead...
Quality of parental consent in a Ugandan malaria studyChristine Pace
Section on Human Subjects, Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bldg 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892-1156, USA
Am J Public Health 95:1184-9. 2005..Our results indicate that further debate is needed about informed consent in treatment studies of emergent illnesses in children...
The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic reviewDavid I Shalowitz
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Arch Intern Med 166:493-7. 2006..Also, they should assess whether reliance on patient-designated and next-of-kin surrogates offers patients and/or their families benefits that are independent of the accuracy of surrogates' decisions...
Medical decision making for patients without surrogatesSumeeta Varma
Department of Bioethics, NIH Clinical Center, 10 Center Dr, Building 10, Room 1C118, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Arch Intern Med 167:1711-5. 2007....
Dissolving the dilemma over forced treatmentVardit Ravitsky
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Lancet 365:1525-6. 2005
The ethics of paying for children's participation in researchDavid Wendler
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, 20892, USA
J Pediatr 141:166-71. 2002
