Research Topics
| E L KornSummaryAffiliation: National Institutes of Health Country: USA Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Abrogation of the hematological and biological activities of the interleukin-3/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor fusion protein PIXY321 by neutralizing anti-PIXY321 antibodies in cancer patients receiving high-dose carboplatinL L Miller
Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Biological Response Modifiers Program, National Cancer Institute, Frederick, MD, USA
Blood 93:3250-8. 1999..The immunogenicity of this fusion protein provides a cautionary warning that clinical development of bioengineered human molecules requires thorough testing for immune neutralization...
Design issues in randomized phase II/III trialsEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, EPN 8129, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA
J Clin Oncol 30:667-71. 2012..We discuss these phase II/III design parameters, give examples of phase II/III trials, and provide recommendations concerning efficient phase II/III trial designs...
Overall survival as the outcome for randomized clinical trials with effective subsequent therapiesEdward L Korn
Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 29:2439-42. 2011....
Assessing surrogates as trial endpoints using mixed modelsEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, EPN 8128, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Stat Med 24:163-82. 2005..Graphical displays are also suggested. Two sets of trial results previously analysed for trial-level surrogacy are used as examples...
Preliminary data release for randomized clinical trials of noninferiority: a new proposalEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch and Clinical Investigations Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, EPN 8128, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 23:5831-6. 2005..Examples are given demonstrating how the proposal would work, along with a discussion of possible objections to the proposal...
Conditional power calculations for clinical trials with historical controlsEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Stat Med 25:2922-31. 2006..We explain why a popular method for doing these calculations is wrong, and discuss alternative methods in the context of normal outcomes, binary outcomes, and time-to-event outcomes...
The likelihood as statistical evidence in multiple comparisons in clinical trials: no free lunchEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, EPN 8129, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892 7434, USA
Biom J 48:346-55. 2006....
An investigation of two multivariate permutation methods for controlling the false discovery proportionEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, EPN 8129, Bethesda, MD 20892 7434, USA
Stat Med 26:4428-40. 2007..We find that the top-down MPT-based method probabilistically controls the FDP, whereas our implementation of the top-down SAM-based method does not. Bottom-up MPT-based or SAM-based methods can result in poor control of the FDP...
A posterior taleEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, EPN 8129, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892 7434, USA
Biom J 49:346-50. 2007..The resolution of this apparent paradox is discussed as well as its relation to real-life problems involving data monitoring of clinical trials...
A note on controlling the number of false positivesEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20852 7434, USA
Biometrics 64:227-31. 2008..An example is given involving gene expression microarray data of breast cancer tumors...
Meta-analysis of phase II cooperative group trials in metastatic stage IV melanoma to determine progression-free and overall survival benchmarks for future phase II trialsEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, EPN 8129, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 26:527-34. 2008....
Stopping or reporting early for positive results in randomized clinical trials: the National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group experience from 1990 to 2005Edward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch and the Clinical Investigations Branch, Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 27:1712-21. 2009....
Accrual experience of National Cancer Institute Cooperative Group phase III trials activated from 2000 to 2007Edward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, EPN 8129, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 28:5197-201. 2010..We examine in detail the accrual experience of the Cooperative Group phase III trials...
Outcome--adaptive randomization: is it useful?Edward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, EPN 8129, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 29:771-6. 2011....
Inefficacy interim monitoring procedures in randomized clinical trials: the need to reportEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Am J Bioeth 11:2-10. 2011..A survey of two leading medical journals suggests that this is not current practice...
Objective method of comparing DNA microarray image analysis systemsEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
Biotechniques 36:960-7. 2004..We demonstrate the method with a comparison of cDNA microarray data generated by the UCSF Spot and the GenePix image processing systems...
Identifying pre-post chemotherapy differences in gene expression in breast tumours: a statistical method appropriate for this aimE L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, EPN 8128, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda MD 20892, USA
Br J Cancer 86:1093-6. 2002..These findings were not reported by the original investigators who analysed the data using cluster analysis techniques...
Clinical trial designs for cytostatic agents: are new approaches needed?E L Korn
Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 19:265-72. 2001..Planned and ongoing trials will test the utility of some of these new approaches...
Measurement error in the timing of events: effect on survival analyses in randomized clinical trialsEdward L Korn
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Clin Trials 7:626-33. 2010....
Blinded independent central review of progression-free survival in phase III clinical trials: important design element or unnecessary expense?Lori E Dodd
Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, Branches of Biometric Research, Investigational Drug, Cancer Investigations, and Diagnostic Imaging, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 26:3791-6. 2008..When such designs are not practical, BICR is not recommended as a general strategy for reducing bias. However, BICR may be useful as an auditing tool to assess the reliability of marginally positive results...
Proposal for the use of progression-free survival in unblinded randomized trialsBoris Freidlin
Biometric Research Branch and the Clinical Investigations Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 25:2122-6. 2007..This proposal, possibly combined with central review of progression scans for these two time points, essentially eliminates any bias, with little risk of major efficiency loss compared with using the reported progression times...
Testing logistic regression coefficients with clustered data and few positive outcomesSally Hunsberger
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, U S A
Stat Med 27:1305-24. 2008..The proposed method is also useful when testing goodness-of-fit of logistic regression models using deciles-of-risk tables...
Lack of generalizability of sensitivity and specificity with treatment effectsLori E Dodd
Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd, Bethesda, MD 20892, U S A
Stat Med 27:1734-44. 2008..These results demonstrate that evaluating sensitivity and specificity within treatment (or other covariate) groups is necessary even when simple proportional hazards models or the Prentice criterion holds...
Randomized clinical trial design for assessing noninferiority when superiority is expectedBoris Freidlin
Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 25:5019-23. 2007..This hybrid design can naturally incorporate a formal test of superiority as well as noninferiority...
Multi-arm clinical trials of new agents: some design considerationsBoris Freidlin
Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
Clin Cancer Res 14:4368-71. 2008..Relative to conducting separate RCTs for each experimental agent, this multi-arm design is shown to require a lower total sample size than multiple two-arm trials...
Monitoring for lack of benefit: a critical component of a randomized clinical trialBoris Freidlin
Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 27:629-33. 2009..On the other hand, we caution that some commonly used monitoring guidelines may result in stopping for lack of benefit even when a nontrivial beneficial effect is observed...
Stopping clinical trials early for benefit: impact on estimationBoris Freidlin
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
Clin Trials 6:119-25. 2009..It has been suggested in the literature that the well-known bias of treatment-effect estimators due to the possibility of early stopping for positive results is a major concern with interim monitoring...
Randomized clinical trials with biomarkers: design issuesBoris Freidlin
Biometric Research Branch, EPN 8122, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Natl Cancer Inst 102:152-60. 2010..We conclude that, in most settings, randomized biomarker-stratified designs (ie, designs that use the biomarker to guide analysis but not treatment assignment) should be used to obtain a rigorous assessment of biomarker clinical utility...
A comment on futility monitoringBoris Freidlin
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Control Clin Trials 23:355-66. 2002..Thus, aggressive monitoring rules may fail to provide sufficiently convincing evidence to influence clinical practice or to establish a standard of treatment...
Release of data from an ongoing randomized clinical trial for sample size adjustment or planningBoris Freidlin
Biometric Research Branch, EPN 8122, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892 7434, USA
Stat Med 26:4074-82. 2007..A simple approach to minimizing the effect of the data release is suggested...
Correcting log ratios for signal saturation in cDNA microarraysLori E Dodd
Biometric Research Branch, DCTD, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892 7434, USA
Bioinformatics 20:2685-93. 2004..The method is based on a censored regression model. Evaluations on several arrays indicate that the method performs well. Simulation studies suggest that the method is robust under certain model violations...
A testing procedure for survival data with few respondersBoris Freidlin
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd EPN 8122, MSC 7434, Bethesda, MD 20892 7434, USA
Stat Med 21:65-78. 2002..Use of the procedure is illustrated with data from two published randomized studies...
Chromosome transfer induced aneuploidy results in complex dysregulation of the cellular transcriptome in immortalized and cancer cellsMadhvi B Upender
Genetics Branch and Laboratory for Biosystems and Cancer, Center for Cancer Research and Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute/NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892-8010, USA
Cancer Res 64:6941-9. 2004..We therefore postulate that the genomic imbalances observed in cancer cells exert their effect through a complex pattern of transcriptional dysregulation...
A general inefficacy interim monitoring rule for randomized clinical trialsBoris Freidlin
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
Clin Trials 7:197-208. 2010..To balance patient interests against the need for acquiring evidence it is desirable to stop a study for inefficacy as soon as convincing evidence that the new therapy is not beneficial becomes available...
Testing treatment effects in the presence of competing risksBoris Freidlin
Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Blvd EPN 8122, MSC 7434, Bethesda, MD 20892 7434, USA
Stat Med 24:1703-12. 2005....
Dose escalation trial designs based on a molecularly targeted endpointSally Hunsberger
Biometrics Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
Stat Med 24:2171-81. 2005..A limited simulation study is performed and the designs are compared with respect to the dose level at the end of escalation and the number of patients treated on study...
Design issues of randomized phase II trials and a proposal for phase II screening trialsLawrence V Rubinstein
Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA
J Clin Oncol 23:7199-206. 2005....
Design of a binary biomarker study from the results of a pilot studyPaul S Albert
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 7434, USA
Biometrics 58:576-85. 2002..We illustrate the methodology with data from a study assessing the reproducibility of p53 immunohistochemistry in bladder tumors...
Stage-specific alterations of the genome, transcriptome, and proteome during colorectal carcinogenesisJens K Habermann
Genetics Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 8010, USA
Genes Chromosomes Cancer 46:10-26. 2007..The identification of novel genes and proteins might deliver molecular targets for diagnostic and therapeutic interventions...
Selecting drug combinations based on total equivalent dose (dose intensity)R Simon
Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1469-76. 1990..The method described here offers one approach to identifying combinations worthy of evaluation in prospective trials...
Predictive margins with survey dataB I Graubard
Biostatistics Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892, USA
Biometrics 55:652-9. 1999..Applications are given using data from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) and the Epidemiologic Followup Study to the first National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES I)...
A prospective randomized phase II trial of GM-CSF priming to prevent topotecan-induced neutropenia in chemotherapy-naive patients with malignant melanoma or renal cell carcinomaJ E Janik
Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Biological Response Modifiers Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Frederick, MD, USA
Blood 97:1942-6. 2001..One partial response was seen in a patient with melanoma, and one patient with renal cell cancer had complete regression of pulmonary metastases and was rendered disease-free by nephrectomy. (Blood. 2001;97:1942-1946)..
Breast cancer classification and prognosis based on gene expression profiles from a population-based studyChristos Sotiriou
Division of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Advanced Technology Center, 8717 Grovemont Circle, Gaithersburg, MD 20877, USA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:10393-8. 2003..When taken together with other array studies, our results highlight the consistent biological and clinical associations with gene expression profiles...
Assessing causal relationships between treatments and clinical outcomes: always read the fine printB Freidlin
Biometric Research Branch, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, 6130 Executive Plaza, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
Bone Marrow Transplant 47:626-32. 2012..At the same time, we illustrate how careful application of special statistical methods for assessment of treatment-outcome causation can be instrumental in complementing existing randomized evidence and guiding design of future research...
Role of independent data-monitoring committees in randomized clinical trials sponsored by the National Cancer InstituteM A Smith
Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
J Clin Oncol 15:2736-43. 1997..To describe the rationale for independent data monitoring committees (DMCs) for National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored phase III cooperative group clinical trials...
Multinomial phase II trial designsBoris Freidlin
J Clin Oncol 20:599. 2002
Early average change in tumor size in a phase 2 trial: efficient endpoint or false promise?Larry V Rubinstein
J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1422-3. 2007
Data monitoring and large apparent treatment effectsEdward L Korn
Control Clin Trials 25:67-9; author reply 71-2. 2004
Strength of accumulating evidence and data monitoring committee decision makingStephen L George
Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Box 3958, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
Stat Med 23:2659-72. 2004..In this paper we present results of a survey of 21 DMC members conducted to investigate how they evaluate accumulating evidence. The results indicate that some DMC members may be over-interpreting developing trends in the data...
A testing procedure for survival data with few respondersBoris Freidlin
Stat Med 23:1818-23. 2004
Erythropoietin to treat anaemia in patients with head and neck cancerBoris Freidlin
Lancet 363:81; author reply 81-2. 2004
Nontoxicity endpoints in phase I trial designs for targeted, non-cytotoxic agentsEdward L Korn
J Natl Cancer Inst 96:977-8. 2004
