Research Topics
| H S HurdSummaryAffiliation: Iowa State University Country: USA Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
An outcomes model to evaluate risks and benefits of Escherichia coli vaccination in beef cattleH Scott Hurd
Department of Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
Foodborne Pathog Dis 9:952-61. 2012..The analysis shows that resulting reduction in the number of shedding animals and the reduced concentration of E. coli on carcasses can combine to reduce human illnesses and cost to beef packers...
Lesion severity at processing as a predictor of Salmonella contamination of swine carcassesH Scott Hurd
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Am J Vet Res 73:91-7. 2012....
Risk-based analysis of the Danish pork Salmonella program: past and futureH Scott Hurd
College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, USA
Risk Anal 28:341-51. 2008..Carcass decontamination was shown as the most effective means of reducing human risk, reducing PAHC to about 10% of the simulated 2004 level...
Swine health impact on carcass contamination and human foodborne riskH Scott Hurd
Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, IA 50011, USA
Public Health Rep 123:343-51. 2008..This study measured the relationship between lesions suggestive of subclinical pig illness at harvest to carcass contamination and human foodborne risk...
Variable abattoir conditions affect Salmonella enterica prevalence and meat quality in swine and porkH S Hurd
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
Foodborne Pathog Dis 2:77-81. 2005..From this and other studies, it appears that elimination of the holding process is not feasible S. enterica control option, given current U.S. harvesting systems...
Quantitative risk from fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella and Campylobacter due to treatment of dairy heifers with enrofloxacin for bovine respiratory diseaseH Scott Hurd
Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
Foodborne Pathog Dis 7:1305-22. 2010..8 billion (one case every 13 years) for Campylobacter...
A stochastic assessment of the public health risks of the use of macrolide antibiotics in food animalsH Scott Hurd
College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Iowa, USA
Risk Anal 28:695-710. 2008..Risks from C. jejuni in poultry or beef are even less. Reduced antibiotic use can adversely impact animal health. These low human risks should be weighed against the alternative risks...
Food systems veterinary medicineH Scott Hurd
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, USA
Anim Health Res Rev 12:187-95. 2011..The challenge is to adopt and apply this systems framework to veterinary medicine and food production. The result will be a rigorous new approach to solving the complex food and health problems of the 21st century...
Effect of short-term lairage on the prevalence of Salmonella enterica in cull sowsS T Larsen
Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
J Food Prot 67:1489-93. 2004..Results of this study suggest that holding pens contribute to increased S. enterica carriage in cull sows. Abattoir holding pens might be an important control point for S. enterica in the ground pork production chain...
Impact of commercial preharvest transportation and holding on the prevalence of Salmonella enterica in cull sowsS T Larsen
Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
J Food Prot 66:1134-8. 2003..The results of this study demonstrate that transport and holding practices may contribute to an increase in S. enterica infection prior to slaughter to levels much higher than those found on the farm...
The effect of lairage on Salmonella isolation from market swineH S Hurd
Pre Harvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases, National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
J Food Prot 64:939-44. 2001..This study suggests that pigs became internally contaminated with Salmonella after leaving the farm, possibly while in the abattoir holding pens, and that 18 h lairage, in clean facilities, does not increase shedding...
Impact of commercial pre-harvest processes on the prevalence of Salmonella enterica in cull sowsJ D McKean
Iowa State University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Ames, Iowa, USA
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 114:353-5. 2001..Transport and lairage practices may contribute to an increased S. enterica contamination immediately prior to slaughter...
Estimation of the Salmonella enterica prevalence in finishing swineH S Hurd
Pre-Harvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research/2 Unit, Ames, IA 50010-0070, USA
Epidemiol Infect 132:127-35. 2004..enterica prevalence. For most herds, serology overestimated the on-farm culture prevalence...
Experimental rapid infection in market swine following exposure to a Salmonella contaminated environmentH S Hurd
Pre Harvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, PO Box 70, Ames, IA 50010, USA
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 114:382-4. 2001..They also demonstrate the high risk of holding pigs longer than six hours. Intervention at this step in the swine production process may have a significant impact on the safety of pork products...
Quantity and distribution of Salmonella recovered from three swine lairage pensA M O'Connor
Department of Veterinary Diagnostic and Production Animal Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
J Food Prot 69:1717-9. 2006..However, this variation suggests that numeroussamples are required to adequately describe the concentration of Salmonella in a lairage pen...
Rapid infection in market-weight swine following exposure to a Salmonella typhimurium-contaminated environmentH S Hurd
National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, IA 50010, USA
Am J Vet Res 62:1194-7. 2001..Intervention at this step of the production process may have a major impact on the safety of pork products...
Low prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in cull sows and porkIrene V Wesley
US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
J Food Prot 71:545-9. 2008..2%; 2 positive of 165 samples). In trial 2, L. monocytogenes was only detected in a single chopped meat block sample (0.15%; 1 positive of 688 total samples). These data indicate the low prevalence of L. monocytogenes in the cull sow...
Preslaughter holding environment in pork plants is highly contaminated with Salmonella entericaM H Rostagno
Pre-Harvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4489-94. 2003..This study identifies the abattoir holding pens as a significant hazard and a potential control point for Salmonella contamination in the preharvest pork production chain...
Salmonella enterica infections in market swine with and without transport and holdingH S Hurd
Pre Harvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, U S Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
Appl Environ Microbiol 68:2376-81. 2002..enterica prevalence in swine. This finding identifies the holding pen as an important S. enterica control point in the pork production chain...
Prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in market-weight turkeys on-farm and at slaughterIrene V Wesley
Pre Harvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases Unit, National Animal Disease Center, U S Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
J Food Prot 72:43-8. 2009..recovered from the crops of birds at the abattoir (24%) was significant (P < 0.05), which may be associated with a detectable decline in lactic acid in the emptied crop...
Rapid aerosol transmission of Salmonella among turkeys in a simulated holding-shed environmentE Harbaugh
Preharvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
Poult Sci 85:1693-9. 2006..Processes that generate significant dust prior to slaughter should be regarded as critical control points for Salmonella...
Comparison of culture, multiplex, and 5' nuclease polymerase chain reaction assays for the rapid detection of Yersinia enterocolitica in swine and pork productsS Boyapalle
Pre-Harvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Agriculture Research Service, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
J Food Prot 64:1352-61. 2001..The results suggest that pork products harbor more ail-bearing Y. enterocolitica than selected organs of freshly slaughtered hogs and that the TaqMan assay is more sensitive than either the multiplex PCR or traditional culture methods...
Effect of preslaughter events on the prevalence of Salmonella in market-weight turkeysIrene V Wesley
Pre Harvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, U S Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
J Food Prot 69:1785-93. 2006..01). This suggests that transport to and holding at the abattoir do not increase the prevalence of Salmonella in turkeys. This observation contrasts with the increase in Salmonella prevalence reported for hogs and some broilers...
The association between cleaning and disinfection of lairage pens and the prevalence of Salmonella enterica in swine at harvestPeggy L Schmidt
College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA
J Food Prot 67:1384-8. 2004..enterica in lairage pens, but the ability of cleaned and disinfected pens to reduce the prevalence of S. enterica in market-weight pigs remains inconclusive...
Detection of multiresistant Salmonella typhimurium DT104 using multiplex and fluorogenic PCRS A Carlson
Enteric Diseases and Food Safety Research Unit, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
Mol Cell Probes 13:213-22. 1999..These results provide a method by which multiresistant S. typhimurium DT104, or potentially the next emerging multiresistant Salmonella, can be accurately detected in only 3-4 h...
Modeling the relationship between food animal health and human foodborne illnessRandall S Singer
Department of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Minnesota, 1971 Commonwealth Avenue, St Paul, MN 55108, USA
Prev Vet Med 79:186-203. 2007....
Culture methods differ on the isolation of Salmonella enterica serotypes from naturally contaminated swine fecal samplesMarcos H Rostagno
National Animal Disease Center, USDA, Ames, IA 50010, USA
J Vet Diagn Invest 17:80-3. 2005..Depending on the objective(s) of investigations on the ecology and epidemiology of S. enterica in swine populations, a method or a combination of methods should be considered for more reliable results...
Effect of preslaughter events on prevalence of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in market-weight turkeysIrene V Wesley
Pre Harvest Food Safety and Enteric Diseases Research Unit, USDA, Agricultural Research Service, National Animal Disease Center, P O Box 70, Ames, Iowa 50010, USA
Appl Environ Microbiol 71:2824-31. 2005..isolates recovered from flock 5 indicated that C. coli was more diverse than C. jejuni at both time 1 and time 2 (P < 0.01), based on a comparison of the Shannon indices of diversity and evenness...
Public health consequences of macrolide use in food animals: a deterministic risk assessmentH Scott Hurd
Hurd Health Consulting, Roland, Iowa 50236, USA
J Food Prot 67:980-92. 2004..faecium-derived risk...
Detection of Listeria monocytogenes in pigs and porkSreenivas R Kanuganti
Tuskegee University, Alabama 36088, USA
J Food Prot 65:1470-4. 2002..05) improved the detection of L. monocytogenes (50.2%) but not that of other Listeria species (1.7%). L. monocytogenes isolates (n = 243) were assigned to serotype 1 (53.5%), serotype 4 (25%), and serotypes other than 1 and 4 (21.4%)...
