Peter H Schwartz

Summary

Affiliation: Indiana University
Country: USA

Publications

  1. ncbi request reprint Patient understanding of benefits, risks, and alternatives to screening colonoscopy
    Peter H Schwartz
    Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46220, USA
    Fam Med 45:83-9. 2013
  2. ncbi request reprint Silence about screening
    Peter H Schwartz
    Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    Am J Bioeth 7:46-8. 2007
  3. pmc The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening
    Peter H Schwartz
    Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    J Gen Intern Med 23:867-70. 2008
  4. doi request reprint Risk and disease
    Peter H Schwartz
    Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    Perspect Biol Med 51:320-34. 2008
  5. doi request reprint Disclosure and rationality: comparative risk information and decision-making about prevention
    Peter H Schwartz
    Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis IUPUI, 410 W 10th St, Suite 3100, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    Theor Med Bioeth 30:199-213. 2009
  6. pmc Caregiver perspectives on cancer screening for persons with dementia: "why put them through it?"
    Alexia M Torke
    Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
    J Am Geriatr Soc 61:1309-14. 2013
  7. pmc Older adults and forgoing cancer screening: "I think it would be strange"
    Alexia M Torke
    Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    JAMA Intern Med 173:526-31. 2013
  8. ncbi request reprint Questioning the quantitative imperative: decision aids, prevention, and the ethics of disclosure
    Peter H Schwartz
    Indiana University Center for Bioethics, USA
    Hastings Cent Rep 41:30-9. 2011

Detail Information

Publications8

  1. ncbi request reprint Patient understanding of benefits, risks, and alternatives to screening colonoscopy
    Peter H Schwartz
    Department of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46220, USA
    Fam Med 45:83-9. 2013
    ..These observations raise concerns about the quality of informed consent for screening colonoscopy...
  2. ncbi request reprint Silence about screening
    Peter H Schwartz
    Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    Am J Bioeth 7:46-8. 2007
  3. pmc The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening
    Peter H Schwartz
    Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    J Gen Intern Med 23:867-70. 2008
    ..Any initiative in this area should take such factors into account and should consider carefully how to apply the ethical principles of respect for autonomy and beneficence...
  4. doi request reprint Risk and disease
    Peter H Schwartz
    Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, 410 W 10th Street, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    Perspect Biol Med 51:320-34. 2008
    ..For both philosophical and ethical reasons, however, the conditions should not be labeled as pathological. The tendency to reclassify risk factors as diseases is an important trend to examine and critique...
  5. doi request reprint Disclosure and rationality: comparative risk information and decision-making about prevention
    Peter H Schwartz
    Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University Purdue University, Indianapolis IUPUI, 410 W 10th St, Suite 3100, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    Theor Med Bioeth 30:199-213. 2009
    ..The criticism of disclosing this sort of information to patients, I conclude, rests on a mistakenly narrow account of the goals of prevention and the nature of rational choice in medicine...
  6. pmc Caregiver perspectives on cancer screening for persons with dementia: "why put them through it?"
    Alexia M Torke
    Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana Regenstrief Institute, Inc, Indianapolis, Indiana Fairbanks Center for Medical Ethics, Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, Indiana
    J Am Geriatr Soc 61:1309-14. 2013
    ..To describe the perspectives of family caregivers toward stopping cancer screening tests for their relatives with dementia and identify opportunities to reduce harmful or unnecessary screening...
  7. pmc Older adults and forgoing cancer screening: "I think it would be strange"
    Alexia M Torke
    Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
    JAMA Intern Med 173:526-31. 2013
    ..Information on older adults' views of screening cessation would be helpful both for clinicians and for those designing interventions to reduce overscreening...
  8. ncbi request reprint Questioning the quantitative imperative: decision aids, prevention, and the ethics of disclosure
    Peter H Schwartz
    Indiana University Center for Bioethics, USA
    Hastings Cent Rep 41:30-9. 2011
    ..That information should always be available to patients who expressly ask for it, but it should be part of standard disclosure only sometimes, and only for some patients. And even then, we need to think about how to offer it...