Lisa Cosgrove

Summary

Affiliation: Harvard University
Country: USA

Publications

  1. doi Conflicts of interest and the quality of recommendations in clinical guidelines
    Lisa Cosgrove
    The Edmond J Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
    J Eval Clin Pract 19:674-81. 2013
  2. pmc Antidepressants and breast and ovarian cancer risk: a review of the literature and researchers' financial associations with industry
    Lisa Cosgrove
    The Edmond J Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
    PLoS ONE 6:e18210. 2011
  3. doi Strengthening conflict-of-interest policies in medicine
    Lisa Cosgrove
    Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
    J Eval Clin Pract 16:21-4. 2010

Collaborators

Detail Information

Publications3

  1. doi Conflicts of interest and the quality of recommendations in clinical guidelines
    Lisa Cosgrove
    The Edmond J Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA
    J Eval Clin Pract 19:674-81. 2013
    ..We selected this guideline because of its influence on clinical practice and because this guideline recommends pharmacotherapy for all levels of depression, despite controversies over the evidence base...
  2. pmc Antidepressants and breast and ovarian cancer risk: a review of the literature and researchers' financial associations with industry
    Lisa Cosgrove
    The Edmond J Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America
    PLoS ONE 6:e18210. 2011
    ..Previous studies in a variety of biomedical fields have found that financial ties to drug companies are associated with favorable study conclusions...
  3. doi Strengthening conflict-of-interest policies in medicine
    Lisa Cosgrove
    Department of Counseling and School Psychology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
    J Eval Clin Pract 16:21-4. 2010
    ..Nor do they address the consequent creation of climates of opinion, which may marginalize important criticisms and undermine progress on this important policy issue...