Research Topics
| Federico M GoodsaidSummaryAffiliation: Food and Drug Administration Country: USA Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studiesLeming Shi
National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA
BMC Bioinformatics 9:S10. 2008..The resultant variety of existing and emerging methods exacerbates confusion and continuing debate in the microarray community on the appropriate choice of methods for identifying reliable DEG lists...
Cross-platform comparability of microarray technology: intra-platform consistency and appropriate data analysis procedures are essentialLeming Shi
National Center for Toxicological Research, U S Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA
BMC Bioinformatics 6:S12. 2005..Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 5676-5684, 2003), portrays a disturbingly negative picture of the cross-platform comparability, and, hence, the reliability of microarray technology...
Microarray scanner calibration curves: characteristics and implicationsLeming Shi
National Center for Toxicological Research, U S Food and Drug Administration, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA
BMC Bioinformatics 6:S11. 2005..Microarray-based measurement of mRNA abundance assumes a linear relationship between the fluorescence intensity and the dye concentration. In reality, however, the calibration curve can be nonlinear...
Novel biomarkers of acute kidney toxicityF M Goodsaid
Genomics Group, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
Clin Pharmacol Ther 86:490-6. 2009....
Implementing the U.S. FDA guidance on pharmacogenomic data submissionsFederico Goodsaid
Genomics Group, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Science, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U S Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20903 0002, USA
Environ Mol Mutagen 48:354-8. 2007..These initiatives have contributed to the effective implementation of the Pharmacogenomics Guidance at the FDA...
Biomarker qualification pilot process at the US Food and Drug AdministrationFederico Goodsaid
Genomics Group, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Science, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD 20903 0002, USA
AAPS J 9:E105-8. 2007..A pilot process and corresponding Biomarker Qualification Review Team have been developed to test how the FDA can work on biomarker qualification...
Voluntary exploratory data submissions to the US FDA and the EMA: experience and impactFederico M Goodsaid
Genomics Group, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US FDA, Building 51, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland 20903 002, USA
Nat Rev Drug Discov 9:435-45. 2010....
Strategic paths for biomarker qualificationFederico M Goodsaid
Genomics Group, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Science, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, MD 20903 0002, United States
Toxicology 245:219-23. 2008..Active strategies for qualification include those associated with context-independent as well as context-dependent qualifications...
Translational medicine and the value of biomarker qualificationFederico M Goodsaid
Genomics Group, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U S Food and Drug Administration FDA, Silver Spring, MD 20903, USA
Sci Transl Med 2:47ps44. 2010..The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has developed a regulatory process for biomarker qualification to accelerate the process by which new biomarkers are integrated in the development of therapies...
Histopathology of vascular injury in Sprague-Dawley rats treated with phosphodiesterase IV inhibitor SCH 351591 or SCH 534385Jun Zhang
Division of Applied Pharmacology Research HFD 910, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993 0002, USA
Toxicol Pathol 36:827-39. 2008..The present study also provides a morphological and cellular basis for evaluating candidate biomarkers of drug-induced vascular injury...
Biomarkers in peripheral blood associated with vascular injury in Sprague-Dawley rats treated with the phosphodiesterase IV inhibitors SCH 351591 or SCH 534385James L Weaver
Division of Applied Pharmacology Research, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993 0002, USA
Toxicol Pathol 36:840-9. 2008..The changes in these parameters showed both a dose- and time-dependent association with histopathologic changes. These biomarkers could provide an additional tool for the nonclinical and clinical evaluation of investigational compounds...
QA/QC: challenges and pitfalls facing the microarray community and regulatory agenciesLeming Shi
US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Toxicoinformatics, Division of Systems Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, HFT 020, 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR 72079, USA
Expert Rev Mol Diagn 4:761-77. 2004..These fundamental issues must be adequately addressed before microarray technology can be transformed from a research tool to clinical practices...
Molecular biomarkers: a US FDA effortHuixiao Hong
Center for Toxicoinformatics, Division of Systems Toxicology, National Center for Toxicological Research, US FDA 3900 NCTR Road, Jefferson, AR, USA
Biomark Med 4:215-25. 2010..Specific FDA programs and research projects related to molecular biomarkers are also discussed for supporting regulatory review in the future...
Translational biomarkers: from preclinical to clinical a report of 2009 AAPS/ACCP Biomarker WorkshopJane P F Bai
Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
AAPS J 13:274-83. 2011....
The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC)-II study of common practices for the development and validation of microarray-based predictive modelsLeming Shi
National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
Nat Biotechnol 28:827-38. 2010..The conclusions and recommendations from MAQC-II should be useful for regulatory agencies, study committees and independent investigators that evaluate methods for global gene expression analysis...
Rat toxicogenomic study reveals analytical consistency across microarray platformsLei Guo
National Center for Toxicological Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas 72079, USA
Nat Biotechnol 24:1162-9. 2006....
Process map proposal for the validation of genomic biomarkersFederico Goodsaid
US Food and Drug Administration, Genomics Group, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Building 21, Room 3663, Silver Spring, MD 20903 0002, USA
Pharmacogenomics 7:773-82. 2006..A discussion on process map proposals for genomic biomarker validation can help with drafting of guidance documents for this process...
Qualification of biomarkers for drug development in organ transplantationGilbert J Burckart
School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
Am J Transplant 8:267-70. 2008....
Evaluation of DNA microarray results with quantitative gene expression platformsRoger D Canales
Applied Biosystems, 850 Lincoln Centre Dr, Foster City, California 94404, USA
Nat Biotechnol 24:1115-22. 2006....
Identification and measurement of genomic biomarkers of nephrotoxicityFederico M Goodsaid
Department of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, Schering Plough Research Institute, 144 Route 94, Lafayette, NJ 07871, USA
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods 49:183-6. 2004..Genomic biomarkers can contribute to this process as indicators or predictors of toxicity. Transcript levels for genes such as the kidney injury molecule have been identified and evaluated as genomic biomarkers of nephrotoxicity...
Quantitative PCR deconstruction of discrepancies between results reported by different hybridization platformsFederico M Goodsaid
Division of Drug Safety and Metabolism, Schering Plough Research Institute, 144 Route 94, PO Box 32, Lafayette, NJ 07848, USA
Environ Health Perspect 112:456-60. 2004..These data demonstrate the importance of using a "gold standard," such as qRT-PCR to confirm key hybridization results as well as to understand the sources of discrepancies resulting from different hybridization platforms...
Genomic biomarkers of toxicityFederico M Goodsaid
Schering Plough Research Institute, Department of Genetic and Molecular Toxicology, 144 Route 94, Lafayette, NJ 07871, USA
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel 6:41-9. 2003..This review will summarize some of the publications that have achieved this transformation, and the steps that are still needed for the implementation of predictive tests derived from these genomic biomarkers of toxicity...
