Research Topics
| E T HigginsSummaryAffiliation: Columbia University Country: USA Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Emotional responses to goal attainment: strength of regulatory focus as moderatorE T Higgins
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 72:515-25. 1997..All studies found that goal attainment yielded greater cheerfulness-dejection responses when promotion focus was stronger and greater quiescence-agitation responses when prevention focus was stronger...
Beyond pleasure and painE T Higgins
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA
Am Psychol 52:1280-300. 1997..g., cognitive dissonance). Then, regulatory focus is distinguished from regulatory anticipation and regulatory reference, 2 other principles underlying the different ways that people approach pleasure and avoid pain...
Promotion and prevention choices between stability and changeN Liberman
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 77:1135-45. 1999..In Studies 3-5, individuals in a prevention focus, but not individuals in a promotion focus, exhibited a reluctance to exchange currently possessed objects (i.e., endowment) or previously possessed objects...
Performance incentives and means: how regulatory focus influences goal attainmentJ Shah
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 74:285-93. 1998..These results suggest that motivation and performance are greater when the regulatory focus of task incentives and means match (vs. mismatch) the chronic regulatory focus of the performers...
Approach and avoidance strength during goal attainment: regulatory focus and the "goal looms larger" effectJ Forster
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 75:1115-31. 1998....
Expectancy x value effects: regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and directionJ Shah
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 73:447-58. 1997..Four studies found that the classic positive interactive effect of expectancy and value on goal commitment increases with a promotion focus and decreases with a prevention focus...
Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: the general impact of promotion and preventionJ Shah
Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin, Madison 53706, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 80:693-705. 2001..These greater appraisal efficiencies were found for both chronic and situationally induced promotion and prevention concerns and were independent of both the valence and the extremity of the appraisals...
Promotion and prevention focus on alternative hypotheses: implications for attributional functionsN Liberman
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 80:5-18. 2001..Study 5 also found that in a promotion focus, person explanations were generalized across situations less than in a prevention focus...
Making a good decision: value from fitE T Higgins
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, Schermerhorn Hall, New York, NY 10027, USA
Am Psychol 55:1217-30. 2000..Studies testing each of these postulates support the value-from-fit proposal. How value from fit can enhance or diminish the value of goal pursuits and the quality of life itself is discussed...
Optimism, promotion pride, and prevention pride as predictors of quality of lifeHeidi Grant
Columbia University, USA
Pers Soc Psychol Bull 29:1521-32. 2003..Both promotion and prevention pride predicted active coping. It is argued that promotion and prevention pride tell us something unique and important about the role of successful self-regulation in determining quality of life...
To "do the right thing" or to "just do it": locomotion and assessment as distinct self-regulatory imperativesA W Kruglanski
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park 20742 4411, USA
J Pers Soc Psychol 79:793-815. 2000..The authors found that (a) locomotion and assessment are relatively independent of each other, (b) both are needed for self-regulatory success, and (c) each relates to distinct task orientations and motivational emphases...
Memory errors from a change of standard: a lack of awareness or of understanding?E T Higgins
Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027
Cogn Psychol 27:227-58. 1994..The change-of-standard effect is explained in terms of a "natural" tendency to use the current categorical meaning of a judgment to reconstruct the referent of its past contextualized meaning...
