Nancy K Steblay

Summary

Affiliation: Augsburg College
Country: USA

Publications

  1. ncbi The impact on juror verdicts of judicial instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence: a meta-analysis
    Nancy Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 30:469-92. 2006
  2. ncbi What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups
    Nancy K Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 35:1-12. 2011
  3. ncbi Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison
    N Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 25:459-73. 2001
  4. ncbi Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison
    Nancy Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 27:523-40. 2003
  5. ncbi Commentary on "Studying eyewitness investigations in the field": a look forward
    Nancy Kay Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 32:11-5. 2008
  6. ncbi Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy
    Nancy K Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, Campus Box 32, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 35:262-74. 2011

Detail Information

Publications6

  1. ncbi The impact on juror verdicts of judicial instruction to disregard inadmissible evidence: a meta-analysis
    Nancy Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 30:469-92. 2006
    ..Contested evidence ruled admissible accentuates that information, resulting in a significant impact on verdicts. Suggestions for how the courts may mitigate the impact of inadmissible evidence more effectively are discussed...
  2. ncbi What we know now: the Evanston Illinois field lineups
    Nancy K Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 35:1-12. 2011
    ..2) Verbatim eyewitness comments were recorded more often in double-blind sequential than in non-blind simultaneous lineup reports (83% vs. 39%). (3) Effective lineup structure was used equally in the two lineup conditions...
  3. ncbi Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison
    N Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 25:459-73. 2001
    ..Implications of these findings are discussed...
  4. ncbi Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison
    Nancy Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 27:523-40. 2003
    ..Function of lineup foils, assessment strategies for false identifications, and the potential impact of biases in lineup practice are suggested as additional considerations in evaluation of showup versus lineup efficacy...
  5. ncbi Commentary on "Studying eyewitness investigations in the field": a look forward
    Nancy Kay Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 32:11-5. 2008
    ..A combination of laboratory and field information provides the means to determine best practices in eyewitness identification procedures...
  6. ncbi Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy
    Nancy K Steblay
    Department of Psychology, Augsburg College, Campus Box 32, 2211 Riverside Avenue, Minneapolis, MN, 55454, USA
    Law Hum Behav 35:262-74. 2011
    ..Witnesses with prior exposure to the culprit did not exhibit a sequential lap effect...