Research Topics
| David AtkinsSummaryAffiliation: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Country: USA Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working GroupDavid Atkins
Center for Practice and Technology Assessment, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Rd Rockville, MD 20852, USA
BMC Health Serv Res 4:38. 2004....
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: pilot study of a new systemDavid Atkins
Center for Practice and Technology Assessment, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 540 Gaither Rd Rokville, MD 20852, USA
BMC Health Serv Res 5:25. 2005..The GRADE Working Group has developed an approach that addresses key shortcomings in these systems. The aim of this study was to pilot test and further develop the GRADE approach to grading evidence and recommendations...
Principles of preventive careDavid Atkins
Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Center for Practice and Technology Assessment, 6010 Executive Boulevard, Suite 300, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
Prim Care 29:475-86. 2002..Approach prevention as a package of important services. Educate patients of the need to address all important health issues rather than focusing on a single issue. Examine how well you are delivering high priority services...
Making policy when the evidence is in disputeDavid Atkins
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality AHRQ, Rockville, Maryland, USA
Health Aff (Millwood) 24:102-13. 2005....
Multiple risk factors interventions. Are we up to the challenge?David Atkins
Center for Outcomes and Evidence, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland, USA
Am J Prev Med 27:102-3. 2004
Better information for better health care: the Evidence-based Practice Center program and the Agency for Healthcare Research and QualityDavid Atkins
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA
Ann Intern Med 142:1035-41. 2005..We examine continuing evolutions of the program and the impact of planned work on comparative effectiveness performed as part of the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003...
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force: screening for lipid disorders in adults: recommendations and rationaleAlfred O Berg
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, MD 20852, USA
Am J Nurs 102:91, 93, 95. 2002
Challenges in using nonrandomized studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventionsSusan L Norris
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA
Ann Intern Med 142:1112-9. 2005..We then offer recommendations for using these studies in systematic reviews of treatment interventions...
Creating and synthesizing evidence with decision makers in mind: integrating evidence from clinical trials and other study designsDavid Atkins
Center for Outcomes and Evidence, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland, USA
Med Care 45:S16-22. 2007....
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsDavid Atkins
BMJ 328:1490. 2004..Our system for guiding these complex judgments balances the need for simplicity with the need for full and transparent consideration of all important issues...
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategiesHolger J Schunemann
Department of Epidemiology, Italian National Cancer Institute Regina Elena, 00144 Rome, Italy
BMJ 336:1106-10. 2008
Going from evidence to recommendationsGordon H Guyatt
CLARITY Research Group, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5
BMJ 336:1049-51. 2008
What is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?Gordon H Guyatt
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5
BMJ 336:995-8. 2008
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendationsGordon H Guyatt
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5
BMJ 336:924-6. 2008
Employer coverage of clinical preventive services in the United StatesMaris Ann Bondi
Health Promotion Research Center, University of Washington School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Seattle, WA 98105, USA
Am J Health Promot 20:214-22. 2006..CONCLUSIONS: Employers seek financial return from their offerings of clinical preventive services to employees, but they are least likely to offer the services most likely to provide this return...
State mandates for preventive health servicesMaris A Bondi
JAMA 288:1233. 2002
The cost-effectiveness of screening mammography beyond age 65 years: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task ForceJeanne Mandelblatt
Georgetown University Medical Center, Lombardi Cancer Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA
Ann Intern Med 139:835-42. 2003..The authors performed a review to determine the costs and benefits of mammography screening after age 65 years...
Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendationsGordon H Guyatt
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5
BMJ 336:1170-3. 2008
