Research Topics
| E WagerSummaryCountry: UK Publications
|
Detail Information
Publications
Response to "the corporate coauthor"Elizabeth Wager
J Gen Intern Med 20:672. 2005
Experiences of the BMJ ethics committeeElizabeth Wager
BMJ 329:510-2. 2004
Authors, ghosts, damned lies, and statisticiansElizabeth Wager
PLoS Med 4:e34. 2007
Making medical messages stickElizabeth Wager
Sideview, Princes Risborough
J R Soc Med 100:385-6. 2007
Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988-2008Elizabeth Wager
Sideview, Princes Risborough, UK
J Med Ethics 37:567-70. 2011..Anecdotal evidence suggested a lack of consistency in journal policies and practices regarding retraction. In order to develop guidelines, we reviewed retractions in Medline to discover how and why articles were retracted...
The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE): Objectives and achievements 1997-2012Elizabeth Wager
Publications Consultant, Sideview, Station Road, Princes Risborough, HP27 9DE, United Kingdom
Presse Med 41:861-6. 2012..Most of COPE's guidance is freely available to the public at www.publicationethics.org...
Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)Elizabeth Wager
Sideview, Princes Risborough, UK
Maturitas 72:165-9. 2012....
Are reviewers suggested by authors as good as those chosen by editors? Results of a rater-blinded, retrospective studyElizabeth Wager
Sideview, Princes Risborough, HP27 9DE, UK
BMC Med 4:13. 2006..Our objective was to compare the performance of author-nominated reviewers (ANR) with that of editor-chosen reviewers (ECR) in terms of review quality and recommendations about submissions in an online-only medical journal...
Ethical publishing: the innocent author's guide to avoiding misconductElizabeth Wager
Council of the Committee on Publication Ethics
Menopause Int 13:98-102. 2007..This paper describes the various types of publication misconduct and offers guidance to authors, reviewers and journal editors about ways to detect and prevent them...
Do medical journals provide clear and consistent guidelines on authorship?Elizabeth Wager
MedGenMed 9:16. 2007..However, previous surveys of authors have suggested that there are no universally known or accepted criteria for determining authorship...
Recognition, reward and responsibility: why the authorship of scientific papers mattersElizabeth Wager
Sideview, 19 Station Road, Princes Risborough HP27 9DE, United Kingdom
Maturitas 62:109-12. 2009..Institutions might therefore play a greater role in setting and enforcing authorship policies. Disputes could be reduced if authorship criteria were agreed, in writing, among all contributors at the start of a research project...
Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international surveyE Wager
Sideview, 19 Station Road, Princes Risborough HP27 9DE, UK
J Med Ethics 35:348-53. 2009..We surveyed journal editors to determine their views about a range of publication ethics issues...
JAMA published fewer industry-funded studies after introducing a requirement for independent statistical analysisElizabeth Wager
Sideview, Princes Risborough, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom
PLoS ONE 5:e13591. 2010..JAMA introduced a requirement for independent statistical analysis for industry-funded trials in July 2005. We wanted to see whether this policy affected the number of industry-funded trials published by JAMA...
What medical writing means to meElizabeth Wager
Medical Writer, editor and trainer Member, Ethics committees, BMJ and WAME Council member, COPE
Mens Sana Monogr 5:169-78. 2007....
"Good Publication Practice for Pharmaceutical Companies": where are we now?Elizabeth Wager
MedGenMed 7:6. 2005....
A concern that drug companies cannot ignoreElizabeth Wager
Sideview, Station Road, Princes Risborough HP27 9DE, UK
J R Soc Med 98:448-50. 2005
Good practice for publishing the results of clinical trialsElizabeth Wager
Sideview, Princes Risborough, UK
J Br Menopause Soc 11:109-11. 2005....
The need for trial identifiersElizabeth Wager
Sideview, Princes Risborough, UK
Curr Med Res Opin 20:203-6. 2004..These include trial registers and trial in all publications could greatly enhance the value of the medical literature and increase the robustness of systematic reviews and meta-analyses...
How to dance with porcupines: rules and guidelines on doctors' relations with drug companiesElizabeth Wager
BMJ 326:1196-8. 2003
Effects of technical editing in biomedical journals: a systematic reviewElizabeth Wager
Sideview, Buckinghamshire, England
JAMA 287:2821-4. 2002..Technical editing supposedly improves the accuracy and clarity of journal articles. We examined evidence of its effects on research reports in biomedical journals...
Good publication practice for pharmaceutical companiesElizabeth Wager
Sideview, Princes Risborough, Buckinghamshire, UK
Curr Med Res Opin 19:149-54. 2003..We also hope that pharmaceutical companies and others involved in developing publications arising from sponsored clinical trials will endorse the guidelines...
What do journal editors do when they suspect research misconduct?Elizabeth Wager
Med Law 26:535-44. 2007..This small survey highlights the difficulties faced by editors in pursuing cases of suspected misconduct and the need for better training and guidance for editors and more cooperation from institutions...
European Medical Writers Association (EMWA) guidelines on the role of medical writers in developing peer-reviewed publicationsAdam Jacobs
Dianthus Medical Limited, London, UK
Curr Med Res Opin 21:317-22. 2005..Although this practice can improve both the quality and speed of publications, it has attracted controversy as a result of concerns about the inappropriate influence of pharmaceutical companies...
Good publication practices for pharmaceutical companies: why we need another set of guidelinesElizabeth Wager
Curr Med Res Opin 19:147-8. 2003
Depressing researchElizabeth Wager
Lancet 363:2087-8. 2004
Measuring the quality of editorial peer reviewTom Jefferson
Health Reviews Ltd, Rome, Italy
JAMA 287:2786-90. 2002..The research needed to understand the broader effects of peer review poses many methodologic problems and would require the cooperation of many parts of the scientific community...
CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstractsSally Hopewell
UK Cochrane Centre, Summertown Pavilion, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK
Lancet 371:281-3. 2008
CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaborationSally Hopewell
UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
PLoS Med 5:e20. 2008..Here, we extend the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement to develop a minimum list of essential items, which authors should consider when reporting the results of a RCT in any journal or conference abstract...
Pressures are growing to publish clinical trialsElizabeth Wager
BMJ 329:1044. 2004
Effects of editorial peer review: a systematic reviewTom Jefferson
Health Reviews Ltd, Rome, Italy
JAMA 287:2784-6. 2002..Editorial peer review is widely used to select submissions to journals for publication and is presumed to improve their usefulness. Sufficient research on peer review has been published to consider a synthesis of its effects...
