- Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias - an updated reviewKerry Dwan
Department of Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, England
PLoS ONE 8:e66844. 2013..Study publication bias and outcome reporting bias have been recognised as a potential threat to the validity of meta-analysis and can make the readily available evidence unreliable for decision making...
- Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting biasKerry Dwan
Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
PLoS ONE 3:e3081. 2008..Until recently, outcome reporting bias has received less attention...
- Assessing the potential for outcome reporting bias in a review: a tutorialKerry Dwan
Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, UK
Trials 11:52. 2010..The aim of this paper is to show how to assess a systematic review and corresponding trial reports for ORB using an example review of intravenous and nebulised magnesium in the treatment of asthma...
- Comparison of protocols and registry entries to published reports for randomised controlled trialsKerry Dwan
Institute of Child Health, University of Liverpool, Alder Hey Children s NHS Foundation Trust, Eaton Road, Liverpool, England, UK, L12 2AP
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:MR000031. 2011..Publication of complete trial results is essential if people are to be able to make well-informed decisions about health care. Selective reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is a common problem...