Sarah Donegan

Summary

Affiliation: University of Liverpool
Country: UK

Publications

  1. doi request reprint Combining individual patient data and aggregate data in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: Individual patient data may be beneficial if only for a subset of trials
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GS, UK
    Stat Med 32:914-30. 2013
  2. doi request reprint Assessing the consistency assumption by exploring treatment by covariate interactions in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: individual patient-level covariates versus aggregate trial-level covariates
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GS, UK
    Stat Med 31:3840-57. 2012
  3. pmc Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality
    Sarah Donegan
    Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    PLoS ONE 5:e11054. 2010

Detail Information

Publications3

  1. doi request reprint Combining individual patient data and aggregate data in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: Individual patient data may be beneficial if only for a subset of trials
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool, L69 3GS, UK
    Stat Med 32:914-30. 2013
    ..We extend the methodology to combine IPD and AD in a mixed treatment comparison (MTC) meta-analysis...
  2. doi request reprint Assessing the consistency assumption by exploring treatment by covariate interactions in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis: individual patient-level covariates versus aggregate trial-level covariates
    Sarah Donegan
    Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Liverpool, Shelley s Cottage, Brownlow Street, Liverpool L69 3GS, UK
    Stat Med 31:3840-57. 2012
    ..Using AD models, there was no evidence that the consistency assumption was invalid; whereas, the assumption was questionable based on the IPD models. The AD analyses were misleading...
  3. pmc Indirect comparisons: a review of reporting and methodological quality
    Sarah Donegan
    Centre for Medical Statistics and Health Evaluation, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
    PLoS ONE 5:e11054. 2010
    ..Our aim is to systematically review the quality of published indirect comparisons to add to existing empirical data suggesting that improvements can be made when reporting and applying indirect comparisons...