J M Blazeby

Summary

Affiliation: University of Bristol
Country: UK

Publications

  1. doi request reprint Patient-reported outcomes after hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastases
    Jonathan R Rees
    School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, and University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
    J Clin Oncol 30:1364-70. 2012
  2. ncbi request reprint Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams
    J M Blazeby
    Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    Ann Oncol 17:457-60. 2006
  3. doi request reprint A qualitative evaluation of patients' experiences of an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal cancer
    J M Blazeby
    Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    Colorectal Dis 12:e236-42. 2010
  4. doi request reprint The early development phases of a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module to assess patient reported outcomes (PROs) in women undergoing breast reconstruction
    H J Thomson
    School of Clinical Sciences and Breast Reconstruction Patient Reported and Clinical Outcomes Research Group, University of Bristol and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
    Eur J Cancer 49:1018-26. 2013
  5. doi request reprint Reporting clinical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a systematic review
    S Potter
    Surgical Research Unit, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    J Natl Cancer Inst 103:31-46. 2011
  6. doi request reprint An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team
    J J Wood
    Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, United Bristol Healthcare Trust, Bristol, UK
    Colorectal Dis 10:769-72. 2008
  7. ncbi request reprint Measurement of outcome
    J M Blazeby
    University Division of Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Level 7, BS2 8HW, Bristol, UK
    Surg Oncol 10:127-33. 2001
  8. doi request reprint Demonstration of the IDEAL recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive oesophagectomy
    J M Blazeby
    Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
    Br J Surg 98:544-51. 2011
  9. doi request reprint Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer
    R N Whistance
    Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    Eur J Cancer 45:3017-26. 2009
  10. doi request reprint Optimising methods for communicating survival data to patients undergoing cancer surgery
    C R Davis
    Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    Eur J Cancer 46:3192-9. 2010

Collaborators

Detail Information

Publications21

  1. doi request reprint Patient-reported outcomes after hepatic resection of colorectal cancer metastases
    Jonathan R Rees
    School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, and University Hospitals Bristol National Health Service Foundation Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom
    J Clin Oncol 30:1364-70. 2012
    ..This study aimed to describe comprehensively the impact of liver surgery for CRC hepatic metastases on PROs...
  2. ncbi request reprint Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams
    J M Blazeby
    Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    Ann Oncol 17:457-60. 2006
    ..For upper gastrointestinal cancer, MDTs require more information about co morbid disease and patient choice to truly optimize the implementation of multi-disciplinary expertise...
  3. doi request reprint A qualitative evaluation of patients' experiences of an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal cancer
    J M Blazeby
    Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    Colorectal Dis 12:e236-42. 2010
    ..We explored the patients' views and experiences of surgery for colorectal cancer within an enhanced recovery programme (ERP)...
  4. doi request reprint The early development phases of a European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) module to assess patient reported outcomes (PROs) in women undergoing breast reconstruction
    H J Thomson
    School of Clinical Sciences and Breast Reconstruction Patient Reported and Clinical Outcomes Research Group, University of Bristol and University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
    Eur J Cancer 49:1018-26. 2013
    ....
  5. doi request reprint Reporting clinical outcomes of breast reconstruction: a systematic review
    S Potter
    Surgical Research Unit, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    J Natl Cancer Inst 103:31-46. 2011
    ..Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer requires accurate evaluation to inform evidence-based participatory decision making, but the standards of outcome reporting after breast reconstruction have not previously been considered...
  6. doi request reprint An evaluation of treatment decisions at a colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team
    J J Wood
    Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, United Bristol Healthcare Trust, Bristol, UK
    Colorectal Dis 10:769-72. 2008
    ..This study examined MDT decision-making by studying whether MDT treatment decisions were implemented and investigated the reasons why some decisions changed after the meeting...
  7. ncbi request reprint Measurement of outcome
    J M Blazeby
    University Division of Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Level 7, BS2 8HW, Bristol, UK
    Surg Oncol 10:127-33. 2001
    ..This article reviews surgical, oncological, patient-based and economic outcomes in oesophageal cancer...
  8. doi request reprint Demonstration of the IDEAL recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation in minimally invasive oesophagectomy
    J M Blazeby
    Division of Surgery, Head and Neck, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
    Br J Surg 98:544-51. 2011
    ..The Idea, Development, Evaluation, Assessment and Long term study (IDEAL) framework makes recommendations for evaluating and reporting surgical innovation and adoption, but remains untested...
  9. doi request reprint Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer
    R N Whistance
    Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    Eur J Cancer 45:3017-26. 2009
    ..The EORTC QLQ-CR29 demonstrates sufficient validity and reliability to support its use to supplement the EORTC QLQ-C30 to assess patient-reported outcomes during treatment for colorectal cancer in clinical trials and other settings...
  10. doi request reprint Optimising methods for communicating survival data to patients undergoing cancer surgery
    C R Davis
    Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    Eur J Cancer 46:3192-9. 2010
    ..Patients undergoing cancer surgery require outcome data to inform decisions, but communication of numerical risk is difficult. This study assessed patient understanding of survival data presented in different formats...
  11. pmc Impact of prostate cancer testing: an evaluation of the emotional consequences of a negative biopsy result
    R C Macefield
    Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol BS8 2PS, UK
    Br J Cancer 102:1335-40. 2010
    ..When testing for prostate cancer, as many as 75% of men with a raised prostate-specific antigen (PSA) have a benign biopsy result. Little is known about the psychological effect of this result for these men...
  12. doi request reprint Clinical decision-making in a multidisciplinary gynaecological cancer team: a qualitative study
    J Kidger
    Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    BJOG 116:511-7. 2009
    ..To explore the factors that influence treatment decision-making in a gynaecological cancer team (MDT)...
  13. doi request reprint A Prospective Study of Patient Reported Outcomes in Pancreatic and Peri-ampullary Malignancy
    J R E Rees
    Centre for Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK
    World J Surg 37:2443-53. 2013
    ..However, limited data are available describing the impact of curative or palliative therapy on pancreatic/peri-ampullary malignancy and quality of life...
  14. doi request reprint Integration of clinical and patient-reported outcomes in surgical oncology
    R C Macefield
    Academic Unit of Surgical Research, School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, UK
    Br J Surg 100:28-37. 2013
    ..This review considers key challenges and opportunities for using PROs effectively in gastrointestinal surgical oncology, drawing on principles learnt from surgical oncology in general...
  15. doi request reprint Maximising recruitment into randomised controlled trials: the role of multidisciplinary cancer teams
    A G K McNair
    Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Clifton, Bristol, UK
    Eur J Cancer 44:2623-6. 2008
    ..12). This study demonstrates that trial recommendation by an MDT significantly increases trial screening rates and may improve recruitment...
  16. ncbi request reprint Quality of life in patients with cancers of the upper gastrointestinal tract
    J M Blazeby
    University Division of Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, BS2 8HW, UK
    Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 1:269-76. 2001
    ..The future use of computer-assisted techniques to collect, analyze and interpret quality of life data will enable the implementation of quality of life results in clinical practice...
  17. ncbi request reprint Assessment of satisfaction with care after inpatient treatment for oesophageal and gastric cancer
    V Kavadas
    Department of Surgery, Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, UK
    Br J Surg 91:719-23. 2004
    ..This study aimed to measure patients' satisfaction with care received for treatment of oesophageal and gastric cancer, and to identify areas that contribute most to overall satisfaction scores...
  18. ncbi request reprint Clinical and psychometric validation of a questionnaire module, the EORTC QLQ-STO 22, to assess quality of life in patients with gastric cancer
    J M Blazeby
    Clinical Sciences at South Bristol and Department of Social Medicine, Bristol Royal Infirmary, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
    Eur J Cancer 40:2260-8. 2004
    ....
  19. doi request reprint The role of health-related quality of life outcomes in clinical decision making in surgery for esophageal cancer: a systematic review
    R Parameswaran
    Department of Thoracic and Upper GI Surgery, The Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Barrack Road, Exeter, EX2 5DW, UK
    Ann Surg Oncol 15:2372-9. 2008
    ..This research evaluated how and whether HRQL outcomes contribute to surgical decision making...
  20. ncbi request reprint Determinants of patient satisfaction in oncology settings from European and Asian countries: preliminary results based on the EORTC IN-PATSAT32 questionnaire
    A Bredart
    Institut Curie, Psycho Oncology Unit, 26, rue d Ulm, FR 75005 PARIS CEDEX 05, Paris, France
    Eur J Cancer 43:323-30. 2007
    ..Future studies, with appropriate sampling frames and stratification procedures, are needed to better understand cross-national and cross-cultural differences in cancer patient satisfaction...
  21. ncbi request reprint An international prospective study of the EORTC cancer in-patient satisfaction with care measure (EORTC IN-PATSAT32)
    A Bredart
    Institut Curie, Psycho Oncology Unit, 26, rue d Ulm, FR 75005 PARIS CEDEX 05, France
    Eur J Cancer 41:2120-31. 2005
    ..Further studies are needed to assess the responsiveness of the questionnaire to changes in the structure and process of care over time...