S Hopewell

Summary

Affiliation: UK Cochrane Centre
Country: UK

Publications

  1. ncbi Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK
    J Clin Epidemiol 61:597-602. 2008
  2. ncbi CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Summertown Pavilion, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK
    Lancet 371:281-3. 2008
  3. ncbi CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
    PLoS Med 5:e20. 2008
  4. ncbi Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford OX2 7LB, UK
    J Clin Epidemiol 59:681-4. 2006
  5. ncbi Abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference: how completely are trials reported?
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, UK
    Clin Trials 2:265-8. 2005
  6. ncbi Assessing the impact of abstracts from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand in Cochrane reviews
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Respirology 8:509-12. 2003
  7. ncbi Full publication of trials initially reported as abstracts in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 1980-2000
    S Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Intern Med J 33:192-4. 2003
  8. ncbi A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials
    S Hopewell
    The U K Cochrane Centre, Oxford, UK
    Stat Med 21:1625-34. 2002
  9. ncbi How important is the size of a reprint order?
    Sally Hopewell
    The UK Cochrane Centre, Middle Way, Oxford, UK
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care 19:711-4. 2003
  10. ncbi Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report
    Mike Clarke
    UK Cochrane Centre, NHS R and D Programme, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK
    J R Soc Med 100:187-90. 2007

Detail Information

Publications12

  1. ncbi Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK
    J Clin Epidemiol 61:597-602. 2008
    ..To assess how information about adverse events is included in systematic reviews...
  2. ncbi CONSORT for reporting randomised trials in journal and conference abstracts
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Summertown Pavilion, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK
    Lancet 371:281-3. 2008
  3. ncbi CONSORT for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: explanation and elaboration
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
    PLoS Med 5:e20. 2008
    ..Here, we extend the CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement to develop a minimum list of essential items, which authors should consider when reporting the results of a RCT in any journal or conference abstract...
  4. ncbi Reporting of trials presented in conference abstracts needs to be improved
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford OX2 7LB, UK
    J Clin Epidemiol 59:681-4. 2006
    ..To assess how trial information reported in conference abstracts differs to their subsequent full publication...
  5. ncbi Abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology conference: how completely are trials reported?
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, UK
    Clin Trials 2:265-8. 2005
    ..To assess how completely trials published in conference proceedings are reported and whether this has changed over time...
  6. ncbi Assessing the impact of abstracts from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand in Cochrane reviews
    Sally Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Respirology 8:509-12. 2003
    ..The aim of this study was to assess the potential impact of including trials, reported in conference abstracts from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand, in Cochrane reviews...
  7. ncbi Full publication of trials initially reported as abstracts in the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine 1980-2000
    S Hopewell
    UK Cochrane Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
    Intern Med J 33:192-4. 2003
    ..Handsearching conference abstracts identified a large number of reports of controlled trials, over one-third of which were unpublished and therefore not easily accessible...
  8. ncbi A comparison of handsearching versus MEDLINE searching to identify reports of randomized controlled trials
    S Hopewell
    The U K Cochrane Centre, Oxford, UK
    Stat Med 21:1625-34. 2002
    ..The results of this study suggest that a combination of MEDLINE and handsearching is required to identify adequately reports of randomized trials...
  9. ncbi How important is the size of a reprint order?
    Sally Hopewell
    The UK Cochrane Centre, Middle Way, Oxford, UK
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care 19:711-4. 2003
    ..This study aims to assess the impact of articles with very high reprint orders ("high-reprint articles") by measuring their citation in the subsequent literature as compared with a control group of articles...
  10. ncbi Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report
    Mike Clarke
    UK Cochrane Centre, NHS R and D Programme, Summertown Pavilion, Middle Way, Oxford OX2 7LG, UK
    J R Soc Med 100:187-90. 2007
    ..In the current study, we assess whether there had been progress in this respect in 2005 and also investigate the extent to which reports begin by referring to systematic reviews providing the justification for the new research reported...
  11. ncbi Publishing protocols of systematic reviews: comparing what was done to what was planned
    Chris A Silagy
    Monash Institute of Health Services Research, Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, Victoria, Australia
    JAMA 287:2831-4. 2002
    ..Even if many of the changes between protocol and review improve the overall study, the reasons for making these should be clearly identified and documented within the final review...
  12. ncbi Systematic reviews of diagnostic tests in cancer: review of methods and reporting
    Susan Mallett
    Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Wolfson College, Oxford OX2 6UD
    BMJ 333:413. 2006
    ..To assess the methods and reporting of systematic reviews of diagnostic tests...