Research Topics
| Sue M MossSummaryAffiliation: Institute of Cancer Research Country: UK Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Should women under 50 be screened for breast cancer?S Moss
Institute of Cancer Research Cancer Screening, Evaluation Unit Block D, 15 Cotswold Road, Suuton, Surrey SM52 5NG, UK
Br J Cancer 91:413-7. 2004....
The spatial distribution of radiodense breast tissue: a longitudinal studySnehal M Pinto Pereira
Cancer Research UK Epidemiology and Genetics Group, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
Breast Cancer Res 11:R33. 2009..This study aims to investigate the spatial distribution of density within the breast using 493 mammographic images from a sample of 165 premenopausal women (~3 medio-lateral oblique views per woman)...
Mammographic density and markers of socioeconomic status: a cross-sectional studyZoe Aitken
Cancer Research UK Epidemiology and Genetics Group, Department of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E 7HT, UK
BMC Cancer 10:35. 2010..This study aims to investigate whether mammographic density varies by SES and to identify the underlying anthropometric, lifestyle and reproductive factors leading to such variation...
Screening women aged 40-49 yearsSue Moss
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sir Richard Doll Building, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Prev Med 53:105-7. 2011..Minimising harms and identifying those women who will benefit most from screening should remain a priority...
Performance measures in three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening pilotS M Moss
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Section of Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, SRD Building, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Gut 61:101-7. 2012..To compare performance measures across all three rounds of the English bowel cancer screening faecal occult blood test pilot and their relation to social deprivation and ethnicity...
Design issues in cancer screening trialsSue Moss
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
Stat Methods Med Res 19:451-61. 2010..It addresses sample size considerations, the use of appropriate outcome measures and the timing of the intervention. Finally, issues related to ensuring appropriate analyses are discussed...
Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years' follow-up: a randomised controlled trialSue M Moss
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
Lancet 368:2053-60. 2006..The Age trial was designed to study the effect on mortality of inviting women for annual mammography from age 40 years...
Effect of testing for human papillomavirus as a triage during screening for cervical cancer: observational before and after studySue Moss
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG
BMJ 332:83-5. 2006..To assess the effect of introducing testing for human papillomavirus combined with liquid based cytology in women with low grade cytological abnormalities...
Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of breast cancer: overdiagnosis in randomised controlled trials of breast cancer screeningSue Moss
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, UK
Breast Cancer Res 7:230-4. 2005..In those trials in which the control arm has been offered screening, although there is a possible shift from invasive to in situ disease, there is no evidence of overdiagnosis as a result of incident screens...
Is radiologists' volume of mammography reading related to accuracy? A critical review of the literatureS M Moss
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
Clin Radiol 60:623-6. 2005..Further work is needed, in a UK or European setting, to study the relationship between reading volume and accuracy at higher volume levels and also the separate effects of reading volume and reading experience...
Randomised controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40: predicted mortality based on surrogate outcome measuresS Moss
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Brookes Lawley Building, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Br J Cancer 92:955-60. 2005..However, a number of assumptions have been necessary and firm conclusions must await the analysis of observed mortality from breast cancer...
Randomised controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40: results of screening in the first 10 yearsS Moss
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Brookes Lawley Building, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Br J Cancer 92:949-54. 2005..There is little evidence of regular mammography in the trial control arm. The setting of this trial within the NHS breast screening programme should ensure applicability of results to a national programme...
False-positive results in the randomized controlled trial of mammographic screening from age 40 ("Age" trial)Louise E Johns
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey, United Kingdom
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19:2758-64. 2010..False-positive recall is a recognized disadvantage of mammographic breast screening, and the rate of such recalls may be higher in younger women, potentially limiting the value of screening below age 50...
Evaluation of primary prevention initiatives for skin cancer: a review from a UK perspectiveJ Melia
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Section of Epidemiology, D Block, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Br J Dermatol 143:701-8. 2000....
Urological referral of asymptomatic men in general practice in EnglandJ Melia
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Section of Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, Sir Richard Doll Building, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Br J Cancer 98:1176-81. 2008..At the time of data collection, 56% (112 out of 200) of GP partners reported that they were aware of receiving the PCRMP pack. To ensure future, effective implementation of guidelines requires evaluation...
A UK-based investigation of inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic biopsiesJ Melia
Department of Histopathology, Addenbrooke s Hospital, Cambridge, UK
Histopathology 48:644-54. 2006..Gleason score has important implications for patient management but morphological reproducibility data for British practice are limited. Using literature-based criteria nine uropathologists took part in a reproducibility study...
The feasibility and results of a population-based approach to evaluating prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer in men with a raised familial riskJ Melia
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Brookes Lawley Building, 15 Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Br J Cancer 94:499-506. 2006..To study further the effects of screening, patients with a raised familial risk should be counselled in clinic about screening of relatives and data routinely recorded so that the effects of screening on high-risk groups can be studied...
Feasibility of familial PSA screening: psychosocial issues and screening adherenceJ Sweetman
Academic Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Cancer Research and Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK
Br J Cancer 94:507-12. 2006..05). First-degree relatives entering the linked familial PSA screening programme do not, in general, have high levels of psychological morbidity. However, a small number of men exhibited psychological distress...
Verification of the cause of death in the trial of early detection of breast cancer. UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer Group. Trial Co-ordinating CentreJ Chamberlain
Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Epidemiology, Sutton, Surrey
Br J Cancer 64:1151-6. 1991..The overall bias in reporting breast cancer deaths was less than 1%. It was concluded that the certified underlying cause of death without review provides an adequate endpoint for evaluating breast cancer screening programmes in the UK...
The relation between mortality from malignant melanoma and early detection in the Cancer Research Campaign Mole Watcher StudyJ Melia
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Epidemiology, D Block, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
Br J Cancer 85:803-7. 2001..9-1.7) in men, 0.9 (95% Cl 0.7-1.3) in females. The lack of a significant reduction in melanoma mortality associated with the intervention raises questions about this approach to early detection and emphasises the need for new strategies...
Psychiatric morbidity associated with screening for breast cancerR Ellman
Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Epidemiology, Sutton, Surrey, UK
Br J Cancer 60:781-4. 1989..Further research is required in cancer patients to determine whether those diagnosed in asymptomatic women have a higher and more sustained degree of psychiatric morbidity than those diagnosed in women who are aware of symptoms...
Survey of the rate of PSA testing in general practiceJ Melia
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Institute of Cancer Research, Section of Epidemiology, D Block, Cotswold Road, Sutton, Surrey, SM2 5NG, UK
Br J Cancer 85:656-7. 2001..5% out of 160 015 men aged > 45 on a GP database, who had no previous record of prostate cancer, had a PSA test. Of the tested men, 21.3% had a PSA > 4 ng/ml. Future data need to distinguish between men with and without symptoms...
Feasibility of targeted early detection for melanoma: a population-based screening studyJ Melia
Cancer Screening Evaluation Unit, Section of Epidemiology, Sutton, Surrey, UK
Br J Cancer 82:1605-9. 2000..Targeted screening for melanoma in the UK will be hampered by difficulties in accurately identifying the target population. Strategies to improve skin self-awareness rather than screening should be developed and evaluated...
Impact of skin cancer education on medical students' diagnostic skillsS Cliff
Department of Dermatology, St Helier Hospital, Carshalton, Surrey, UK
Clin Exp Dermatol 28:214-7. 2003..The methods of evaluation, such as ours, can be simple and inexpensive...
