Research Topics
| D G AltmanSummaryAffiliation: Imperial Cancer Research Fund Country: UK Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Statistical reviewing for medical journalsD G Altman
ICRF Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, U K
Stat Med 17:2661-74. 1998..I suggest how to present and structure the reviewer's report to the editor. Finally, I consider wider issues, including the various other ways in which statisticians can interact with medical journals...
What do we mean by validating a prognostic model?D G Altman
ICRF Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
Stat Med 19:453-73. 2000..We illustrate the issues using several case studies...
Statistics in medical journals: some recent trendsD G Altman
ICRF Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
Stat Med 19:3275-89. 2000..I also consider developments in the reporting of research in medical journals...
Methodological challenges in the evaluation of prognostic factors in breast cancerD G Altman
Imperial Cancer Research Fund Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, UK
Breast Cancer Res Treat 52:289-303. 1998..Guidelines are proposed for conducting and evaluating prognostic factor studies which should improve the quality of research in this important area...
Teaching non-specialist health care professionals how to identify the atypical mole syndrome phenotype: a multinational studyJ A Bishop
ICRF Cancer Medicine Research Unit, St James s University Hospital, Leeds, UK
Br J Dermatol 142:331-7. 2000..Accurate diagnosis of the atypical mole syndrome phenotype is possible by non-specialists. This has implications for collaborative studies of naevi, for screening and for both primary and secondary prevention of melanoma...
Time trends in breast cancer survival: experience in a single centre, 1975-89M J Bradburn
Imperial Cancer Research Fund Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, UK
Br J Cancer 77:1944-9. 1998..We cannot explain an apparently worse survival in the group of patients presenting in the early 1980s compared with that observed in the late 1970s...
Reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers: a review of published articles in relation to REMARK guidelinesS Mallett
Centre for Statistics in Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6UD, UK
Br J Cancer 102:173-80. 2010..Poor reporting compromises the reliability and clinical value of prognostic tumour marker studies. We review articles to assess the reporting of patients and events using REMARK guidelines, at the time of guideline publication...
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studiesJ J Deeks
Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Oxford, UK
Health Technol Assess 7:iii-x, 1-173. 2003....
Survival analysis part IV: further concepts and methods in survival analysisT G Clark
Cancer Research UK/NHS Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
Br J Cancer 89:781-6. 2003
Survival analysis Part III: multivariate data analysis -- choosing a model and assessing its adequacy and fitM J Bradburn
Cancer Research UK/NHS Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
Br J Cancer 89:605-11. 2003
Survival analysis part I: basic concepts and first analysesT G Clark
Cancer Research UK/NHS Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Old Road, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK
Br J Cancer 89:232-8. 2003
A prognostic model for ovarian cancerT G Clark
ICRF Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Old Road, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
Br J Cancer 85:944-52. 2001..This model is consistent with other models in the ovarian cancer literature; it has better predictive ability and, after simplification and validation, could be used in clinical practice...
Randomised trial of educational visits to enhance use of systematic reviews in 25 obstetric unitsJ C Wyatt
Imperial Cancer Research Fund Medical Statistics Group, Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Institute of Health Sciences, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LF
BMJ 317:1041-6. 1998..To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational visit to help obstetricians and midwives select and use evidence from a Cochrane database containing 600 systematic reviews...
A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health researchI Simera
University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Eur J Clin Invest 40:35-53. 2010..This paper presents a collection of tools and guidelines available on the EQUATOR website (http://www.equator-network.org) that have been developed to increase the accuracy and transparency of health research reporting...
