D A Korevaar

Summary

Affiliation: Academic Medical Center
Country: The Netherlands

Publications

  1. doi request reprint Reviewing the evidence on nodding syndrome, a mysterious tropical disorder
    Daniel Arnoldus Korevaar
    Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Int J Infect Dis 17:e149-52. 2013
  2. ncbi request reprint Podoconiosis, a neglected tropical disease
    D A Korevaar
    Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Neth J Med 70:210-4. 2012
  3. doi request reprint Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies: publication bias in laboratory animal experiments
    D A Korevaar
    Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center AMC, University of Amsterdam UvA, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Lab Anim 45:225-30. 2011

Detail Information

Publications4

  1. doi request reprint Reviewing the evidence on nodding syndrome, a mysterious tropical disorder
    Daniel Arnoldus Korevaar
    Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Int J Infect Dis 17:e149-52. 2013
    ..To review the literature on the prevalence, clinical manifestations, pathogenesis, treatment, and implications of nodding syndrome (NS)...
  2. ncbi request reprint Podoconiosis, a neglected tropical disease
    D A Korevaar
    Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Neth J Med 70:210-4. 2012
    ..In February 2011, the World Health Organisation designated podoconiosis as one of the 20 neglected tropical diseases, marking an important step in the fight against the disease...
  3. doi request reprint Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of preclinical studies: publication bias in laboratory animal experiments
    D A Korevaar
    Department of General Practice, Academic Medical Center AMC, University of Amsterdam UvA, PO Box 22700, 1100 DD Amsterdam, The Netherlands
    Lab Anim 45:225-30. 2011
    ..A statistically significant proportion of MAs considered publication bias (26/35) and tried to formally assess it (21/35)...