J B Tebbetts

Summary

Publications

  1. doi High- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2150-9. 2010
  2. ncbi Patient acceptance of adequately filled breast implants using the tilt test
    J B Tebbetts
    INAMED Corporation, Dallas, Texas, USA
    Plast Reconstr Surg 106:139-47; discussion 148-9. 2000
  3. doi Diagnosis and management of seroma following breast augmentation: an update
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 128:17-25. 2011
  4. doi A process for quantifying aesthetic and functional breast surgery: I. Quantifying optimal nipple position and vertical and horizontal skin excess for mastopexy and breast reduction
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 132:65-73. 2013
  5. ncbi Axillary endoscopic breast augmentation: processes derived from a 28-year experience to optimize outcomes
    John B Tebbetts
    Dallas, Texas, USA
    Plast Reconstr Surg 118:53S-80S. 2006
  6. ncbi Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process
    John B Tebbetts
    Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
    Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005-16. 2005
  7. ncbi "Out points" criteria for breast implant removal without replacement and criteria to minimize reoperations following breast augmentation
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1258-62. 2004
  8. ncbi A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1396-409; discussion 1410-5. 2002
  9. ncbi Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: Part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentation
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 109:293-305; discussion 306-7. 2002
  10. ncbi Breast augmentation with full-height anatomic saline implants: the pros and cons
    J B Tebbetts
    Clin Plast Surg 28:567-77. 2001

Detail Information

Publications26

  1. doi High- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patients
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2150-9. 2010
    ..To minimize risks of negative tissue consequences for patients, surgeon awareness, patient education, and optimal implant selection decision processes are essential...
  2. ncbi Patient acceptance of adequately filled breast implants using the tilt test
    J B Tebbetts
    INAMED Corporation, Dallas, Texas, USA
    Plast Reconstr Surg 106:139-47; discussion 148-9. 2000
    ..More adequately filled implants could potentially reduce risks of reoperations by reducing premature shell failure and shell wrinkling complications...
  3. doi Diagnosis and management of seroma following breast augmentation: an update
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 128:17-25. 2011
    ..This update specifically addresses additional diagnosis and management alternatives for management of seroma in breast augmentation patients that may relate to lymphoproliferative disorders or anaplastic large cell lymphoma...
  4. doi A process for quantifying aesthetic and functional breast surgery: I. Quantifying optimal nipple position and vertical and horizontal skin excess for mastopexy and breast reduction
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 132:65-73. 2013
    ..Future submissions will detail application of the processes for skin envelope design and address composite, three-dimensional parenchyma modification options...
  5. ncbi Axillary endoscopic breast augmentation: processes derived from a 28-year experience to optimize outcomes
    John B Tebbetts
    Dallas, Texas, USA
    Plast Reconstr Surg 118:53S-80S. 2006
    ..This article reports a 28-year experience with axillary subpectoral and submammary breast augmentation, and defines proved processes and surgical techniques that have evolved during that experience...
  6. ncbi Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support process
    John B Tebbetts
    Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
    Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005-16. 2005
    ....
  7. ncbi "Out points" criteria for breast implant removal without replacement and criteria to minimize reoperations following breast augmentation
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1258-62. 2004
    ....
  8. ncbi A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamics
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1396-409; discussion 1410-5. 2002
    ..The TEPID system is a simple, efficient, and clinically practical method that allows surgeons to base implant selection on clinically quantifiable, individual patient tissue characteristics...
  9. ncbi Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: Part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentation
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 109:293-305; discussion 306-7. 2002
    ....
  10. ncbi Breast augmentation with full-height anatomic saline implants: the pros and cons
    J B Tebbetts
    Clin Plast Surg 28:567-77. 2001
    ..Absent the willingness and skills development to meet these requirements, surgeons should avoid using anatomic implants...
  11. ncbi Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: part I. Refining practices by using motion and time study principles
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 109:273-90; discussion 291-2. 2002
    ....
  12. ncbi Alternatives and trade-offs in breast augmentation
    J B Tebbetts
    Clin Plast Surg 28:485-500, vi. 2001
    ....
  13. ncbi A surgical perspective from two decades of breast augmentation: toward state of the art in 2001
    J B Tebbetts
    Clin Plast Surg 28:425-34, v. 2001
    ..Based on this experience, the author focuses on patient education, the importance of patient choice, patient evaluation and preoperative planning, surgical techniques, patient recovery, and factors to limit reoperations...
  14. ncbi Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types
    J B Tebbetts
    2801 Lemmon Avenue West, Suite 300, Dallas, TX 75204, USA
    Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255-72. 2001
    ....
  15. ncbi Patient evaluation, operative planning, and surgical techniques to increase control and reduce morbidity and reoperations in breast augmentation
    J B Tebbetts
    Clin Plast Surg 28:501-21. 2001
    ....
  16. ncbi Decision and management algorithms to address patient and food and drug administration concerns regarding breast augmentation and implants
    William P Adams
    Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
    Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1252-7. 2004
    ....
  17. ncbi Achieving a zero percent reoperation rate at 3 years in a 50-consecutive-case augmentation mammaplasty premarket approval study
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1453-7. 2006
    ..The hypothesis of this study was that implementing specific peer-reviewed and published processes can significantly reduce reoperation rates in a premarket approval study...
  18. ncbi Conclusions not supported by data: a recurring story in breast augmentation publications
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 118:563-5; author reply 565-6; discussion 566-7. 2006
  19. ncbi Wishes and tissues: a concern about dimensional planning systems that lack volume restrictions and do not prioritize long-term soft-tissue coverage
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 117:318-20. 2006
  20. ncbi Brody's article on "the perfect breast"
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1203-4; author reply 1206-7. 2005
  21. ncbi Does fascia provide additional, meaningful coverage over a breast implant?
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 113:777-9; author reply 779-80. 2004
  22. ncbi An approach that integrates patient education and informed consent in breast augmentation
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 110:971-8; discussion 979-81. 2002
    ..The documents are not endorsed by ASPS and do not necessarily represent the views of ASPS...
  23. ncbi Reply to "responsibilities of our journal editors and reviewers"
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 114:832-3. 2004
  24. ncbi Dual plane breast augmentation: avoiding pectoralis major displacement
    Oscar M Ramirez
    Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1198; author reply 1198-9. 2002
  25. ncbi Early return to normal activities after breast augmentation
    Manjit I S Brar
    Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1193-4; author reply 1194-5. 2002
  26. ncbi Pain control in augmentation mammaplasty: the use of indwelling catheters in 200 consecutive patients
    John B Tebbetts
    Plast Reconstr Surg 113:784-5; author reply 785. 2004