Patient acceptance of adequately filled breast implants using the tilt testJ B Tebbetts
INAMED Corporation, Dallas, Texas, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 106:139-47; discussion 148-9. 2000
..More adequately filled implants could potentially reduce risks of reoperations by reducing premature shell failure and shell wrinkling complications...
High- and extra-high-projection breast implants: potential consequences for patientsJohn B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2150-9. 2010
..To minimize risks of negative tissue consequences for patients, surgeon awareness, patient education, and optimal implant selection decision processes are essential...
Axillary endoscopic breast augmentation: processes derived from a 28-year experience to optimize outcomesJohn B Tebbetts
Dallas, Texas, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 118:53S-80S. 2006
..This article reports a 28-year experience with axillary subpectoral and submammary breast augmentation, and defines proved processes and surgical techniques that have evolved during that experience...
Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: the high five decision support processJohn B Tebbetts
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 116:2005-16. 2005
....
"Out points" criteria for breast implant removal without replacement and criteria to minimize reoperations following breast augmentationJohn B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1258-62. 2004
....
Diagnosis and management of seroma following breast augmentation: an updateJohn B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 128:17-25. 2011
..This update specifically addresses additional diagnosis and management alternatives for management of seroma in breast augmentation patients that may relate to lymphoproliferative disorders or anaplastic large cell lymphoma...
A system for breast implant selection based on patient tissue characteristics and implant-soft tissue dynamicsJohn B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 109:1396-409; discussion 1410-5. 2002
..The TEPID system is a simple, efficient, and clinically practical method that allows surgeons to base implant selection on clinically quantifiable, individual patient tissue characteristics...
Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: Part II. Patient preparation, refined surgical techniques, and instrumentationJohn B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 109:293-305; discussion 306-7. 2002
....
Achieving a predictable 24-hour return to normal activities after breast augmentation: part I. Refining practices by using motion and time study principlesJohn B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 109:273-90; discussion 291-2. 2002
....
Dual plane breast augmentation: optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast typesJ B Tebbetts
2801 Lemmon Avenue West, Suite 300, Dallas, TX 75204, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1255-72. 2001
....
A surgical perspective from two decades of breast augmentation: toward state of the art in 2001J B Tebbetts
Clin Plast Surg 28:425-34, v. 2001
..Based on this experience, the author focuses on patient education, the importance of patient choice, patient evaluation and preoperative planning, surgical techniques, patient recovery, and factors to limit reoperations...
Alternatives and trade-offs in breast augmentationJ B Tebbetts
Clin Plast Surg 28:485-500, vi. 2001
....
Patient evaluation, operative planning, and surgical techniques to increase control and reduce morbidity and reoperations in breast augmentationJ B Tebbetts
Clin Plast Surg 28:501-21. 2001
....
Breast augmentation with full-height anatomic saline implants: the pros and consJ B Tebbetts
Clin Plast Surg 28:567-77. 2001
..Absent the willingness and skills development to meet these requirements, surgeons should avoid using anatomic implants...
Decision and management algorithms to address patient and food and drug administration concerns regarding breast augmentation and implantsWilliam P Adams
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1252-7. 2004
....
Does fascia provide additional, meaningful coverage over a breast implant?John B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 113:777-9; author reply 779-80. 2004
An approach that integrates patient education and informed consent in breast augmentationJohn B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 110:971-8; discussion 979-81. 2002
..The documents are not endorsed by ASPS and do not necessarily represent the views of ASPS...
Achieving a zero percent reoperation rate at 3 years in a 50-consecutive-case augmentation mammaplasty premarket approval studyJohn B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 118:1453-7. 2006
..The hypothesis of this study was that implementing specific peer-reviewed and published processes can significantly reduce reoperation rates in a premarket approval study...
Conclusions not supported by data: a recurring story in breast augmentation publicationsJohn B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 118:563-5; author reply 565-6; discussion 566-7. 2006
Wishes and tissues: a concern about dimensional planning systems that lack volume restrictions and do not prioritize long-term soft-tissue coverageJohn B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 117:318-20. 2006
Brody's article on "the perfect breast"John B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 115:1203-4; author reply 1206-7. 2005
Dual plane breast augmentation: avoiding pectoralis major displacementOscar M Ramirez
Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1198; author reply 1198-9. 2002
Early return to normal activities after breast augmentationManjit I S Brar
Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1193-4; author reply 1194-5. 2002
Reply to "responsibilities of our journal editors and reviewers"John B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 114:832-3. 2004
Pain control in augmentation mammaplasty: the use of indwelling catheters in 200 consecutive patientsJohn B Tebbetts
Plast Reconstr Surg 113:784-5; author reply 785. 2004