Takeru Shiroiwa

Summary

Publications

  1. Shiroiwa T, Sung Y, Fukuda T, Lang H, Bae S, Tsutani K. International survey on willingness-to-pay (WTP) for one additional QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness?. Health Econ. 2010;19:422-37 pubmed publisher
    ..8% (Japan), 3.7% (ROK), 1.6% (Taiwan), 2.8% (UK), 1.9% (Australia), and 3.2% (US). Based on the current study, we suggest new classification of cost-effectiveness plane and methodology for decision making. ..
  2. Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Shimozuma K, Mouri M, Hagiwara Y, Doihara H, et al. Long-term health status as measured by EQ-5D among patients with metastatic breast cancer: comparison of first-line oral S-1 and taxane therapies in the randomized phase III SELECT BC trial. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:445-453 pubmed publisher
    ..Considering non-inferiority of S-1 in terms of OS, obtained quality-adjusted life years may be greater in the S-1 arm. ..
  3. Shiroiwa T, Ikeda S, Noto S, Igarashi A, Fukuda T, Saito S, et al. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan. Value Health. 2016;19:648-54 pubmed publisher
    ..Japanese value sets based on DCE were demonstrated. On comparing the observed cTTO scores, we found that the hybrid model was slightly superior to the simpler methods, including the TTO model. ..
  4. Shiroiwa T, Saito S, Shimozuma K, Kodama S, Noto S, Fukuda T. Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency: Assessment and Application to Decision Making. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14:375-85 pubmed publisher
    ..The single- and multi-attribute experiments revealed similar preferences. PAT can reflect people's preferences within the decision-maker's threshold range in a numerical manner. ..
  5. Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Ikeda S, Takura T, Moriwaki K. Development of an Official Guideline for the Economic Evaluation of Drugs/Medical Devices in Japan. Value Health. 2017;20:372-378 pubmed publisher
    ..The guideline is expected to improve the quality and comparability of submitted cost-effectiveness data for decision making. ..
  6. Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Ikeda S, Takura T. New decision-making processes for the pricing of health technologies in Japan: The FY 2016/2017 pilot phase for the introduction of economic evaluations. Health Policy. 2017;121:836-841 pubmed publisher
    ..This represents the first step to introducing cost-effectiveness analysis in the Japanese healthcare system. We believe that these efforts will contribute to the efficiency and sustainability of the Japanese healthcare system. ..
  7. Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Shimozuma K, Mouri M, Hagiwara Y, Kawahara T, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of S-1 therapy for first-line metastatic breast cancer treatment in Japan: results from the randomized phase III SELECT BC trial. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:773 pubmed publisher
    ..Our results show that the introduction of oral S-1 therapy for metastatic breast cancer is highly likely to be cost-effective. UMIN CTR C000000416 . Registered on May 10, 2006. ..

Detail Information

Publications7

  1. Shiroiwa T, Sung Y, Fukuda T, Lang H, Bae S, Tsutani K. International survey on willingness-to-pay (WTP) for one additional QALY gained: what is the threshold of cost effectiveness?. Health Econ. 2010;19:422-37 pubmed publisher
    ..8% (Japan), 3.7% (ROK), 1.6% (Taiwan), 2.8% (UK), 1.9% (Australia), and 3.2% (US). Based on the current study, we suggest new classification of cost-effectiveness plane and methodology for decision making. ..
  2. Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Shimozuma K, Mouri M, Hagiwara Y, Doihara H, et al. Long-term health status as measured by EQ-5D among patients with metastatic breast cancer: comparison of first-line oral S-1 and taxane therapies in the randomized phase III SELECT BC trial. Qual Life Res. 2017;26:445-453 pubmed publisher
    ..Considering non-inferiority of S-1 in terms of OS, obtained quality-adjusted life years may be greater in the S-1 arm. ..
  3. Shiroiwa T, Ikeda S, Noto S, Igarashi A, Fukuda T, Saito S, et al. Comparison of Value Set Based on DCE and/or TTO Data: Scoring for EQ-5D-5L Health States in Japan. Value Health. 2016;19:648-54 pubmed publisher
    ..Japanese value sets based on DCE were demonstrated. On comparing the observed cTTO scores, we found that the hybrid model was slightly superior to the simpler methods, including the TTO model. ..
  4. Shiroiwa T, Saito S, Shimozuma K, Kodama S, Noto S, Fukuda T. Societal Preferences for Interventions with the Same Efficiency: Assessment and Application to Decision Making. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14:375-85 pubmed publisher
    ..The single- and multi-attribute experiments revealed similar preferences. PAT can reflect people's preferences within the decision-maker's threshold range in a numerical manner. ..
  5. Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Ikeda S, Takura T, Moriwaki K. Development of an Official Guideline for the Economic Evaluation of Drugs/Medical Devices in Japan. Value Health. 2017;20:372-378 pubmed publisher
    ..The guideline is expected to improve the quality and comparability of submitted cost-effectiveness data for decision making. ..
  6. Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Ikeda S, Takura T. New decision-making processes for the pricing of health technologies in Japan: The FY 2016/2017 pilot phase for the introduction of economic evaluations. Health Policy. 2017;121:836-841 pubmed publisher
    ..This represents the first step to introducing cost-effectiveness analysis in the Japanese healthcare system. We believe that these efforts will contribute to the efficiency and sustainability of the Japanese healthcare system. ..
  7. Shiroiwa T, Fukuda T, Shimozuma K, Mouri M, Hagiwara Y, Kawahara T, et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of the introduction of S-1 therapy for first-line metastatic breast cancer treatment in Japan: results from the randomized phase III SELECT BC trial. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:773 pubmed publisher
    ..Our results show that the introduction of oral S-1 therapy for metastatic breast cancer is highly likely to be cost-effective. UMIN CTR C000000416 . Registered on May 10, 2006. ..