R Edward Hendrick

Summary

Publications

  1. ncbi Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study
    R Edward Hendrick
    Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Ctr and Dept of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Univ, Galter Pavilion, 13th Floor, 251 E Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
    Radiology 247:38-48. 2008
  2. ncbi United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored
    R Edward Hendrick
    Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, C278, 12700 E 19th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W112-6. 2011
  3. ncbi Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies
    R Edward Hendrick
    Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Room C278, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
    Radiology 257:246-53. 2010
  4. ncbi Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial
    R Edward Hendrick
    Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, 80045, USA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:362-9. 2010
  5. ncbi Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST
    Etta D Pisano
    Department of Radiology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
    Radiology 246:376-83. 2008
  6. ncbi Physical inactivity and percent breast density among Hispanic women
    Pilar Lopez
    Department of Preventive Medicine, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 680 N Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1102, Chicago, IL, USA
    Int J Cancer 107:1012-6. 2003
  7. ncbi Mammography screening: a new estimate of number needed to screen to prevent one breast cancer death
    R Edward Hendrick
    Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, 12700 E 19th Ave, Mail Stop C278, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:723-8. 2012
  8. ncbi Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods
    R Edward Hendrick
    Department of Radiology, Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Galter Pavilion, 13th Floor, 251 E Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:433-8. 2005
  9. ncbi American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology
    Etta D Pisano
    Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
    Radiology 236:404-12. 2005
  10. ncbi Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose
    Eric A Berns
    The Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA
    Med Phys 30:334-40. 2003

Detail Information

Publications33

  1. ncbi Accuracy of soft-copy digital mammography versus that of screen-film mammography according to digital manufacturer: ACRIN DMIST retrospective multireader study
    R Edward Hendrick
    Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Ctr and Dept of Radiology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern Univ, Galter Pavilion, 13th Floor, 251 E Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
    Radiology 247:38-48. 2008
    ....
  2. ncbi United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored
    R Edward Hendrick
    Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, C278, 12700 E 19th Ave, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:W112-6. 2011
    ..Evidence made available to the USPSTF strongly supports the mortality benefit of annual screening mammography beginning at age 40 years, whereas potential harms of screening with this regimen are minor...
  3. ncbi Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies
    R Edward Hendrick
    Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, Room C278, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
    Radiology 257:246-53. 2010
    ..To compare radiation doses and lifetime attributable risks (LARs) of radiation-induced cancer incidence and mortality from breast imaging studies involving the use of ionizing radiation...
  4. ncbi Comparison of acquisition parameters and breast dose in digital mammography and screen-film mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial
    R Edward Hendrick
    Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, 80045, USA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:362-9. 2010
    ..The purpose of our study was to compare the technical performance of full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and screen-film mammography...
  5. ncbi Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST
    Etta D Pisano
    Department of Radiology, UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 7510, USA
    Radiology 246:376-83. 2008
    ....
  6. ncbi Physical inactivity and percent breast density among Hispanic women
    Pilar Lopez
    Department of Preventive Medicine, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 680 N Lake Shore Drive, Suite 1102, Chicago, IL, USA
    Int J Cancer 107:1012-6. 2003
    ..These results support the need for further research investigating the effect of physical activity on breast cancer risk...
  7. ncbi Mammography screening: a new estimate of number needed to screen to prevent one breast cancer death
    R Edward Hendrick
    Department of Radiology, University of Colorado Denver, School of Medicine, 12700 E 19th Ave, Mail Stop C278, Aurora, CO 80045, USA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol 198:723-8. 2012
    ....
  8. ncbi Community-based mammography practice: services, charges, and interpretation methods
    R Edward Hendrick
    Department of Radiology, Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Galter Pavilion, 13th Floor, 251 E Huron St, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:433-8. 2005
    ..The purpose of our study was to accurately describe facility characteristics among community-based screening and diagnostic mammography practices in the United States...
  9. ncbi American College of Radiology Imaging Network digital mammographic imaging screening trial: objectives and methodology
    Etta D Pisano
    Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
    Radiology 236:404-12. 2005
    ....
  10. ncbi Optimization of technique factors for a silicon diode array full-field digital mammography system and comparison to screen-film mammography with matched average glandular dose
    Eric A Berns
    The Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA
    Med Phys 30:334-40. 2003
    ..Under this constraint, optimum low-contrast lesion detection with FFDM was superior to that for SFM for all but the thinnest breasts...
  11. ncbi Classification of breast lesions with multimodality computer-aided diagnosis: observer study results on an independent clinical data set
    Karla Horsch
    Department of Radiology, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
    Radiology 240:357-68. 2006
    ..66-0.69; P = .20). CONCLUSION: Use of multimodality intelligent workstations can improve the performance of radiologists in the task of differentiating malignant and benign lesions at mammography and sonography...
  12. ncbi Technical quality control practices in mammography screening programs in 22 countries
    R Edward Hendrick
    The Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
    Int J Qual Health Care 14:219-26. 2002
    ..To assess current technical quality control (QC) practices within breast cancer screening or surveillance programs internationally...
  13. ncbi Digital and screen-film mammography: comparison of image acquisition and interpretation times
    Eric A Berns
    Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:38-41. 2006
    ..The objective of our study was to compare acquisition times and interpretation times of screening examinations using screen-film mammography and soft-copy digital mammography...
  14. ncbi How to optimize clinical breast MR imaging practices and techniques on Your 1.5-T system
    Dana R Rausch
    Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Medical Center, Box 1234, 1 Gustave L Levy Place, New York, NY 10029, USA
    Radiographics 26:1469-84. 2006
    ..The imaging section thickness should be 3 mm or less, the pixel size should be less than 1 mm in each in-plane direction, and the total acquisition time should be less than 2 minutes...
  15. ncbi Performance comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography in clinical practice
    Eric A Berns
    The Lynn Sage Comprehensive Breast Center, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA
    Med Phys 29:830-4. 2002
    ..These results indicate that the clinical use of digital mammography may generally improve image quality for equal or lower breast doses, while providing tighter control on exposures and image quality than screen-film mammography...
  16. ncbi Breast MR imaging artifacts: how to recognize and fix them
    Jennifer A Harvey
    Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA
    Radiographics 27:S131-45. 2007
    ..Once they are recognized, many of these artifacts can be corrected. Protocol monitoring and imaging-based feedback from the interpreting radiologist are essential for minimizing artifacts and optimizing breast MR imaging...
  17. ncbi Associations of breast cancer risk factors with breast density in Hispanic women
    Susan M Gapstur
    Department of Preventive Medicine, The Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinos 60611, USA
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:1074-80. 2003
    ..Additional research focusing on relationships of other, potentially modifiable, factors with the extent of breast density is warranted to better understand the interindividual variability in density among Hispanic women...
  18. ncbi Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer
    John M Lewin
    University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. 9th Ave, Mail Stop F724, Denver, CO 80262, USA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:671-7. 2002
    ..CONCLUSION: No significant difference in cancer detection was observed between digital mammography and screen-film mammography. Digital mammography resulted in fewer recalls than did screen-film mammography...
  19. ncbi DMIST results: technologic or observer variability?
    Daniel B Kopans
    Radiology 248:703; author reply 703. 2008
  20. ncbi A limitation of ACRIN DMIST
    Gordon L Hixson
    Radiology 248:702; author reply 702-3. 2008
  21. ncbi Does litigation influence medical practice? The influence of community radiologists' medical malpractice perceptions and experience on screening mammography
    Joann G Elmore
    Dept of Internal Medicine, Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Ctr, 325 Ninth Ave, Box 359780, Seattle, WA 98104 2499, USA
    Radiology 236:37-46. 2005
    ..To assess the relationship between radiologists' perception of and experience with medical malpractice and their patient-recall rates in actual community-based clinical settings...
  22. ncbi Should breast imaging practices convert to digital mammography? A response from members of the DMIST Executive Committee
    Etta D Pisano
    Radiology 245:12-3. 2007
  23. ncbi Quality control for digital mammography: part II. Recommendations from the ACRIN DMIST trial
    Martin J Yaffe
    Imaging Research Program, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
    Med Phys 33:737-52. 2006
    ....
  24. ncbi Quality control for digital mammography in the ACRIN DMIST trial: part I
    Aili K Bloomquist
    Imaging Research Program, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
    Med Phys 33:719-36. 2006
    ..Because of the relatively short duration of this study further, investigation of the long-term failure characteristics of these systems is advisable...
  25. ncbi Mammographers' perception of women's breast cancer risk
    Joseph R Egger
    Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98104-2499, USA
    Med Decis Making 25:283-9. 2005
    ..However, only age was statistically significant. No association was found between radiologists' risk estimate and their recall rate. CONCLUSION: U.S. radiologists have a heightened perception of breast cancer risk...
  26. ncbi Current realities of delivering mammography services in the community: do challenges with staffing and scheduling exist?
    Carl D'Orsi
    Breast Imaging Center, Dept of Radiology, Emory Univ, W C I Building, 1701 Uppergate Drive, Suite C1104, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
    Radiology 235:391-5. 2005
    ..To evaluate the current (2001-2002) capacity of community-based mammography facilities to deliver screening and diagnostic services in the United States...
  27. ncbi Radiologist uncertainty and the interpretation of screening
    Patricia A Carney
    Department of Community and Family Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover and Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
    Med Decis Making 24:255-64. 2004
    ..To determine radiologists' reactions to uncertainty when interpreting mammography and the extent to which radiologist uncertainty explains variability in interpretive performance...
  28. ncbi Influence of computer-aided detection on performance of screening mammography
    Joshua J Fenton
    University of California, Davis, Sacramento, USA
    N Engl J Med 356:1399-409. 2007
    ..Since the Food and Drug Administration approved the technology in 1998, it has been disseminated into practice, but its effect on the accuracy of interpretation is unclear...
  29. ncbi The association between obesity and screening mammography accuracy
    Joann G Elmore
    Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359780, Seattle, WA 98104 2499, USA
    Arch Intern Med 164:1140-7. 2004
    ..Obesity is increasing among American women, especially as they age. The influence of obesity on the accuracy of screening mammography has not been studied extensively...
  30. ncbi Digital mammography
    John M Lewin
    Diversified Radiology of Colorado, P C, 938 Bannock Street, Suite 300, Denver, CO 80204, USA
    Radiol Clin North Am 42:871-84, vi. 2004
    ....
  31. ncbi Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists
    William E Barlow
    Cancer Research and Biostatistics, 1730 Minor Ave, Ste 1900, Seattle WA 98101, USA
    J Natl Cancer Inst 96:1840-50. 2004
    ..Radiologists differ in their ability to interpret screening mammograms accurately. We investigated the relationship of radiologist characteristics to actual performance from 1996 to 2001...
  32. ncbi MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer
    Constance D Lehman
    University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
    N Engl J Med 356:1295-303. 2007
    ....
  33. ncbi Reality check: perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers
    Joshua J Fenton
    Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, Davis, 4860 Y St, Ste 2300, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:42-6. 2006
    ..2%). CONCLUSION: Despite regular performance feedback, community radiologists may overestimate their true rates of recommending further evaluation after screening mammography and underestimate their true positive predictive value...