Jean Francois Bonnefon
- Putting ifs to work: goal-based relevance in conditional directivesDenis J Hilton
Laboratoire Dynamiques Sociocognitives et Vie Politique D S V P, Universite Toulouse 2, Toulouse, France
J Exp Psychol Gen 134:388-405. 2005..The authors' findings illustrate a form of social rationality common in everyday interaction, which broadens normative conceptions of conditionals...
- Politeness and conditional reasoning: interpersonal cues to the indirect suppression of deductive inferencesVirginie Demeure
Universite de Toulouse le Mirail, CNRS, 31058 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 35:260-6. 2009..The first experiment manipulated the threat level of a correction through the portrayed personality of the person being corrected; the second experiment manipulated the affective distance between the corrector and the corrected...
- Facework and uncertain reasoning in health communicationStefania Pighin
CNRS and University of Toulouse, France
Patient Educ Couns 85:169-72. 2011..Based on a sociolinguistic analysis of the way these uncertainty terms are used, we predicted that they would be interpreted differently by patients as a function of whether they qualified good news or bad news...
- Can mutualistic morality predict how individuals deal with benefits they did not deserve?Jean Francois Bonnefon
CNRS, and CLLE Cognition Langues Langage Ergonomie, Maison de la Recherche, Universite de Toulouse, 31058 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
Behav Brain Sci 36:83. 2013..In line with the target article, we expect that this dilemma will be solved by a fixed individual strategy rather than a case-by-case rational calculation...
- The modular nature of trustworthiness detectionJean Francois Bonnefon
Cognition, Langues, Langage et Ergonomie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France
J Exp Psychol Gen 142:143-50. 2013....
- The causal structure of utility conditionalsJean Francois Bonnefon
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Universite de Toulouse, France
Cogn Sci 37:193-209. 2013..Thus, an adequate account of utility-informed inferences conditional reasoning requires three components: utility, probability, and causal structure...
- A theory of utility conditionals: Paralogical reasoning from decision-theoretic leakageJean Francois Bonnefon
Cognition, Langues, Langage et Ergonomie CLLE, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris, France
Psychol Rev 116:888-907. 2009..The theory of utility conditionals significantly extends the scope of current theories of conditional inference and moves reasoning research toward a greater integration with decision-making research...
- When some is actually all: scalar inferences in face-threatening contextsJean Francois Bonnefon
Laboratoire Cognition, Langues, Langage et Ergonomie Maison de la recherche, Universite de Toulouse, CNRS, 5 Allées A Machado, 31058 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
Cognition 112:249-58. 2009..These findings are considered from the perspective of Relevance Theory as well as that of the Generalized Conversational Inference approach...
- Consequential conditionals: invited and suppressed inferences from valued outcomesJean Francois Bonnefon
Maison de la Recherche, University of Toulouse 2, Toulouse, France
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 30:28-37. 2004..The authors discuss how these results can enrich current approaches of conditional inference on the basis of mental models, complementary necessary conditions, and conditional probabilities...
- Tactful or doubtful? Expectations of politeness explain the severity bias in the interpretation of probability phrasesJean Francois Bonnefon
Laboratoire Travail et Cognition, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Toulouse, France
Psychol Sci 17:747-51. 2006..An analysis of interpretations of probability expressions using a membership-function approach validates this account. We discuss the consequences of this bias for the communication of risk within and outside the medical domain...
- Norms for reasoning about decisionsJean Francois Bonnefon
CNRS and Universite de Toulouse, CLLE, Maison de la Recherche, 31058 Toulouse Cedex 9, France
Behav Brain Sci 34:249-50. 2011..The current balance between normativism and descriptivism is illustrated by three approaches to reasoning about decisions...
- Decision makers use norms, not cost-benefit analysis, when choosing to conceal or reveal unfair rewardsMarco Heimann
Institut d Administration des Entreprises and Laboratoire Cognition Langues Langage Ergonomie, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
PLoS ONE 8:e73223. 2013..We discuss how this result can be extended to individual and cultural variations in the tendency to display or to hide unfair rewards. ..
- The 1-in-X effect on the subjective assessment of medical probabilitiesStefania Pighin
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Universite de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Med Decis Making 31:721-9. 2011..The 1-in-X effect generalizes to different populations, probabilities, and medical conditions. Further-more, the effect is not attenuated by a communicative intervention (verbal analogy), but it disappears with an icon array visual aid...
- How do individuals solve the doctrinal paradox in collective decisions? An empirical investigationJean Francois Bonnefon
Universite de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Psychol Sci 18:753-5. 2007
- Mortality salience and morality: thinking about death makes people less utilitarianBastien Trémolière
Cognition, Langues, Langage, ergonomie, Universite de Toulouse, France
Cognition 124:379-84. 2012..g., assisted suicide) often involve matters of life and death...
- Utilitarian relevance and face management in the interpretation of ambiguous question/request statementsVirginie Demeure
CNRS and Universite de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Mem Cognit 36:873-81. 2008..A board game paradigm is developed to allow for a clean, orthogonal manipulation of all variables. The results wholly support the utilitarian relevance approach and offer new perspectives on the face management approach...
- A mixed Rasch model of dual-process conditional reasoningJean Francois Bonnefon
Universite de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 61:809-24. 2008..This account receives indirect support from the extant literature and direct support from a mixed Rasch model of responses given to 18 syllogisms by 486 adult reasoners...
- People are more likely to be insincere when they are more likely to accidentally tell the truthSylvie Leblois
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 66:1486-92. 2013..This is the first demonstration of a new moral hypocrisy paradox: People are more likely to be insincere when they are more likely to accidentally tell the truth. ..
- Overcoming number numbness in prenatal risk communicationStefania Pighin
CNRS and University of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
Prenat Diagn 31:809-13. 2011..When forming their subjective representation of a probability, pregnant women may focus on inappropriate factors and ignore the appropriate factors...