Affiliation: University of British Columbia
- In the mind's eye: provider and patient attitudes on functional brain imagingJ Illes
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Department of Pediatric, Stanford, CA 94305, United States
J Psychiatr Res 43:107-14. 2008..Our results suggest that, once ready, roll out of the fully validated technology has significant potential to reduce social burden associated with highly stigmatized illnesses like depression...
- A landscape for training in dementia knowledge translation (DKT)Judy Illes
National Core for Neuroethics, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Gerontol Geriatr Educ 32:260-72. 2011..Sharing information among professionals and with the public and formulating actionable messages to policy makers are primary goals...
- Stem cell clinical trials for spinal cord injury: readiness, reluctance, redefinitionJ Illes
Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall Koerner Pavilion, Room S124, Vancouver, BC V6T 2B5, Canada
Stem Cell Rev 7:997-1005. 2011..To bridge this gap, we conclude with a number of considerations for the timing disparity of trials and recommendations for improving informed consent...
- Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging researchJ Illes
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, CA, USA
Neurology 70:384-90. 2008..Forethought and clarity will enable these goals without overburdening research conducted within or outside the medical setting...
- Ethical consideration of incidental findings on adult brain MRI in researchJ Illes
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
Neurology 62:888-90. 2004..To characterize the frequency and severity of incidental findings in brain MRIs of young and older adult research volunteers, and to provide an evaluation of the ethical challenges posed by the detection of such findings...
- The international dimensions of neuroethicsSofia Lombera
National Core for Neuroethics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada
Dev World Bioeth 9:57-64. 2009..Neuroethics is an international endeavor and, as such, should be sensitive to the impact that context has on acceptance and use of technological innovation...
- More education, less administration: reflections of neuroimagers' attitudes to ethics through the qualitative looking glassA A Kehagia
National Core for Neuroethics, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, 2211 Wesbrook Mall, Koerner S124, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada
Sci Eng Ethics 18:775-88. 2012..Students in particular, urged changes to curricula to include early, focused training in ethics...
- Ethical implications of neuroimaging in sports concussionJ Valerio
National Core for Neuroethics, Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
J Head Trauma Rehabil 27:216-21. 2012....
- Imaging genetics and the power of combined technologies: a perspective from neuroethicsK Tairyan
National Core for Neuroethics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Neuroscience 164:7-15. 2009..These are characterized by new knowledge and new implications for health care, justice, and policy. We conclude by examining these features in the context of public health at the interface of emerging new neurotechnologies...
- Prospects for prediction: ethics analysis of neuroimaging in Alzheimer's diseaseJ Illes
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics and Department of Radiology, Program in Neuroethics, Stanford, California 94304 5748, USA
Ann N Y Acad Sci 1097:278-95. 2007..Proactive planning for the ethical and societal implications of predicting diseases of the aging brain is critical and will benefit all stakeholders-researchers, patients and families, health care providers, and policy makers...
- International perspectives on engaging the public in neuroethicsJudy Illes
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Department of Radiology, 701 Welch Road, Building A, Suite 1105, Palo Alto, California 94304 5748, USA
Nat Rev Neurosci 6:977-82. 2005..Here, we present perspectives on engaging the public on these issues on an international scale, the role of the media, and prospects for the new field of neuroethics as both a focus and a driver of these efforts...
- Neuroscience-based lie detection: the urgent need for regulationHenry T Greely
Center for Law and the Biosciences, Stanford University, USA
Am J Law Med 33:377-431. 2007
- Commercializing cognitive neurotechnology--the ethical terrainMargaret L Eaton
Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, 518 Memorial Way, Stanford, California 94305-5615, USA
Nat Biotechnol 25:393-7. 2007
- Interacting and paradoxical forces in neuroscience and societyJennifer Singh
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Center for Integration of Research on Genetics and Ethics, 701 Welch Road, Building A, Suite 1105, Palo Alto, California 94304 5748, USA
Nat Rev Neurosci 8:153-60. 2007....
- Neuroethical responsibilitiesEric Racine
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
Can J Neurol Sci 33:269-77, 260-8. 2006....
- ELSI priorities for brain imagingJudy Illes
Stanford University, USA
Am J Bioeth 6:W24-31. 2006..We identified specific ethical, legal and social issues (ELSI) that highlight researcher obligations and the nonclinical impact of the technology at this new frontier...
- Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging researchJudy Illes
Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
Science 311:783-4. 2006
- Subjects' expectations in neuroimaging researchMatthew P Kirschen
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94304-5748, USA
J Magn Reson Imaging 23:205-9. 2006..CONCLUSION: Clarity about procedures for handling incidental findings when obtaining written and verbal informed consent is essential to ensure that the subjects' expectations are consistent with the purpose and scope of the research...
- Discovery and disclosure of incidental findings in neuroimaging researchJudy Illes
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94304 5748, USA
J Magn Reson Imaging 20:743-7. 2004..To examine different protocols for handling incidental findings on brain research MRIs, and provide a platform for establishing formal discussions of related ethical and policy issues...
- Bridging philosophical and practical implications of incidental findings in brain researchJudy Illes
University of British Columbia, BC, Canada
J Law Med Ethics 36:298-304, 212. 2008..Identification and examination of these challenges have been met by scientific interest and a robust, interdisciplinary response resulting in the pragmatic recommendations discussed here...
- Neuroethics: an emerging new discipline in the study of brain and cognitionJudy Illes
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, 701 Welch Road, Palo Alto, CA 94304 5748, USA
Brain Cogn 50:341-4. 2002..Theoretical, practical, and ethical considerations at the heart of imaging healthy research subjects and cognitively compromised patients are explored...
- Ethical and practical considerations in managing incidental findings in functional magnetic resonance imagingJudy Illes
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304 5748, USA
Brain Cogn 50:358-65. 2002....
- Self-referred whole-body CT imaging: current implications for health care consumersJudy Illes
Department of Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, 701 Welch Rd, Stanford, CA 94304 5748, USA
Radiology 228:346-51. 2003....
- New prospects and ethical challenges for neuroimaging within and outside the health care systemJudy Illes
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1932-4. 2003
- Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendationsSusan M Wolf
University of Minnesota, MN, USA
J Law Med Ethics 36:219-48, 211. 2008..We recommend a pathway and categorize IFs into those that must be disclosed to research participants, those that may be disclosed, and those that should not be disclosed...
- Medical imaging: a hub for the new field of neuroethicsJudy Illes
Acad Radiol 11:721-3. 2004
- A fish story? Brain maps, lie detection, and personhoodJudy Illes
Cerebrum 6:73-80. 2004..When technology of this kind moves out of the hands of researchers and becomes available for practical uses, the lives of individuals and future of our society may be profoundly affected...
- Brain screening and incidental findings: flocking to folly?Judy Illes
Lancet Neurol 7:23-4. 2008
- Imaging or imagining? A neuroethics challenge informed by geneticsJudy Illes
Stanford University, USA
Am J Bioeth 5:5-18. 2005..Indeed, ethical interpretation of such findings will necessitate not only traditional bioethical input but also a wider perspective on the construction of scientific knowledge...
- Empirical neuroethics. Can brain imaging visualize human thought? Why is neuroethics interested in such a possibility?Judy Illes
Program in Neuroethics, Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
EMBO Rep 8:S57-60. 2007
- Incidental findings on pediatric MR images of the brainBrian S Kim
Department of Radiology, Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford, CA 94304, USA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:1674-7. 2002....
- Advanced Neuroimaging: Ethical, Legal, and Social IssuesJudy Illes; Fiscal Year: 2005..abstract_text> ..
- Advanced Neuroimaging: Ethical, Legal, and Social IssuesJudy Illes; Fiscal Year: 2010....