Goran I Benić

Summary

Publications

  1. doi request reprint In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography
    Goran I Benić
    Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Clin Oral Implants Res 24:378-83. 2013
  2. doi request reprint Systematic review of parameters and methods for the professional assessment of aesthetics in dental implant research
    Goran I Benić
    Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    J Clin Periodontol 39:160-92. 2012
  3. doi request reprint Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study
    Goran I Benić
    Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prothodontics and Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Clin Oral Implants Res 23:560-6. 2012
  4. doi request reprint Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results
    Goran I Benić
    Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine and Cranio maxillofacial Surgery, University of Zurich, Zurich 8032, Switzerland
    Clin Oral Implants Res 20:507-13. 2009
  5. doi request reprint Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study
    Goran I Benić
    Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    J Clin Periodontol 40:1052-61. 2013
  6. doi request reprint Prospective randomized controlled clinical study comparing two dental implant systems: demographic and radiographic results at one year of loading
    Daniel S Thoma
    Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Clin Oral Implants Res 25:142-9. 2014
  7. doi request reprint A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques
    Daniel S Thoma
    Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Clin Oral Implants Res 20:146-65. 2009

Detail Information

Publications7

  1. doi request reprint In vitro assessment of artifacts induced by titanium dental implants in cone beam computed tomography
    Goran I Benić
    Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Clin Oral Implants Res 24:378-83. 2013
    ..The objective of this study was to evaluate the geometric pattern and the intensity of artifacts around titanium implants in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) using an in vitro model...
  2. doi request reprint Systematic review of parameters and methods for the professional assessment of aesthetics in dental implant research
    Goran I Benić
    Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    J Clin Periodontol 39:160-92. 2012
    ..The purpose of the present systematic review was to evaluate the scientific literature regarding the professional assessment of aesthetics in implant dentistry...
  3. doi request reprint Dimensions of buccal bone and mucosa at immediately placed implants after 7 years: a clinical and cone beam computed tomography study
    Goran I Benić
    Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prothodontics and Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Clin Oral Implants Res 23:560-6. 2012
    ..The objective of this study was to evaluate the dimensions of buccal bone and soft tissue at immediately placed implants over a 7-year period...
  4. doi request reprint Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results
    Goran I Benić
    Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center for Dental and Oral Medicine and Cranio maxillofacial Surgery, University of Zurich, Zurich 8032, Switzerland
    Clin Oral Implants Res 20:507-13. 2009
    ..The aim of this study was to test whether or not implants associated with bone regeneration show the same survival and success rates as implants placed in native bone in patients requiring both forms of therapy...
  5. doi request reprint Titanium-zirconium narrow-diameter versus titanium regular-diameter implants for anterior and premolar single crowns: 1-year results of a randomized controlled clinical study
    Goran I Benić
    Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    J Clin Periodontol 40:1052-61. 2013
    ..To test whether titanium-zirconium (TiZr) 3.3 mm diameter implants perform differently from titanium (Ti) 4.1 mm diameter implants with respect to marginal bone level (MBL) and clinical parameters...
  6. doi request reprint Prospective randomized controlled clinical study comparing two dental implant systems: demographic and radiographic results at one year of loading
    Daniel S Thoma
    Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Clin Oral Implants Res 25:142-9. 2014
    ..To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of implants and implant-supported reconstructions using a 1-piece (STM) and a 2-piece (BRA) dental implant system...
  7. doi request reprint A systematic review assessing soft tissue augmentation techniques
    Daniel S Thoma
    Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
    Clin Oral Implants Res 20:146-65. 2009
    ..The focused question was: is one method superior over others for augmentation and stability of the augmented soft tissue in terms of increasing the width of keratinized tissue (part 1) and gain in soft tissue volume (part 2)...