Research Topics
| David DawsonSummaryAffiliation: ILSI Europe Country: Belgium Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Application of the margin of exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: methyleugenol, CASRN: 93-15-2Benjamin Smith
FIRMENICH S A, Switzerland
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S89-97. 2010..9 mg/kg-bw/d following adjustment to daily average doses. The MoEs ranged from 100 to 800 depending on the assumptions used in the exposure estimation...
Evaluation of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) - Challenges and approachesI Dewhurst
Mammalian Toxicology, Chemicals Regulation, Directorate Health and Safety Executive, Mallard House, York YO1 7PX, UK Electronic address
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 65:168-77. 2013....
Application of the Margin of Exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: benzene, CAS: 71-43-2Benjamin Smith
FIRMENICH S A, Switzerland
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S49-56. 2010..6 mg/kg-bw/d following adjustment to daily average doses. The MOEs ranged from 2 x 10(6) to 0.4 x 10(6) depending on the assumptions used in the exposure estimation...
Application of the margin of exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: (CAS No. 96-23-1) 1,3-dichloro-2-propanol (DCP)Gary Williams
New York Medical College, USA
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S57-62. 2010..62 mg/kg-body weight (bw)/day. The exposure of humans was estimated at an average of 0.00009 mg/kg-bw/day and a high exposure of 0.000136 mg/kg-bw/day. The MOEs for these exposures were 100,000 and 70,000, respectively...
Application of the margin of exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: ethyl carbamate (CAS 51-79-6)Josef Schlatter
Federal Office of Public Health, Switzerland
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S63-8. 2010..The corresponding calculated MOEs were 16600 and 3125, respectively...
Application of the margin of exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: furan (CAS No. 110-00-9)Philip Carthew
Unilever Research, UK
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S69-74. 2010..Dose-response modelling of the data for hepatocellular tumours gives a BMDL10 of 1.23 mg/kg/day, and MOEs of between 750 and 4300 for exposures of infants and adults...
Application of the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: CAS No: 105650-23-5 PhIP (2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine)Philip Carthew
Unilever Research, UK
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S98-105. 2010..48 mg/kg/day for the prostate tumours, 0.74 mg/kg/day for mammary tumours and 2.71 mg/kg/day for colon tumours. The lowest MOEs for prostate, mammary and colon tumours were 20,000, 40,000 and 150,000, respectively...
Evaluation of scientific criteria for identifying allergenic foods of public health importanceJ H M van Bilsen
TNO Earth Environmental and Life Sciences, Zeist, The Netherlands
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 60:281-9. 2011..The framework helps to identify gaps in knowledge and to uncover the level of heterogeneity of the evidence thus guiding research and providing a basis for sound risk management decisions...
EURRECA: development of tools to improve the alignment of micronutrient recommendationsC Matthys
ILSI Europe a i s b l, Brussels, Belgium
Eur J Clin Nutr 64:S26-31. 2010..Therefore, EURRECA can contribute towards nutrition policy development and public health strategies...
Application of the margin of exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: example: aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)Diane Benford
Food Standards Agency, UK
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S34-41. 2010..Estimates of mean dietary exposure estimates were 0.4 ng/kg-bw/d and 2.6 ng/kg-bw/d, representing regions with low and high exposure, respectively. The MOEs for mean exposure therefore range from 100 to 600...
Application of the Margin of Exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: EXAMPLE: acrylamide (CAS No. 79-06-1)P Michael Bolger
US Food and Drug Administration, USA
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S25-33. 2010..Acrylamide may be formed when foods, particularly those that are high in carbohydrates and low in protein, are subjected to high temperatures during cooking or other thermal processing...
Application of the margin of exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic: EXAMPLE 12: Sudan I (CAS No. 842-07-9)Myriam Coulet
Nestle Research Centre, Switzerland
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S106-11. 2010..The great variability and uncertainties in the human exposure data which are country specific, depending on consumption patterns and methodology used, resulted in a large range of MOE values (from 30 to 2,000,000)...
Recontamination as a source of pathogens in processed foodsM W Reij
Laboratory of Food Microbiology, Wageningen University, P O Box 8129, NL 6700 EV Wageningen, The Netherlands
Int J Food Microbiol 91:1-11. 2004..This paper advocates that an effort should be made to develop our knowledge and information on recontamination further and start using it systematically in the exposure assessment part of Microbiological Risk Assessment studies...
Workshop on trichothecenes with a focus on DON: summary reportJohn Christian Larsen
Institute of Food Safety and Nutrition, Mørkhøj Bygade 19, DK 2860 Søborg, Denmark
Toxicol Lett 153:1-22. 2004..A number of recommendations were given under the headings: prevention, sampling and analytical methods, exposure assessment, and toxicology. Gaps in knowledge were also identified...
A risk-based methodology for deriving quality standards for organic contaminants in sewage sludge for use in agriculture--Conceptual FrameworkD Schowanek
Procter and Gamble European Technical Centre, Product Safety and Regulatory Affairs, Temselaan 100, 1853 Strombeek Bever, Belgium
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 40:227-51. 2004..g., 100 years) needs to be assessed. The SQS may therefore vary with the (local) sludge application regime, and/or sludge pretreatment processes...
Foodborne protozoan parasitesDavid Dawson
Campden and Chorleywood Food Research Association, Microbiology Department, Chipping Campden, Gloucestershire GL55 6LD, United Kingdom
Int J Food Microbiol 103:207-27. 2005..g., where water supplies may become contaminated)...
Risk-benefit considerations of mitigation measures on acrylamide content of foods--a case study on potatoes, cereals and coffeeC J Seal
Newcastle University, School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
Br J Nutr 99:S1-S46. 2008
Application of the margin of exposure (MOE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic. Example: leucomalachite greenAndrew Renwick
University of Southampton, UK
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S75-80. 2010..Human exposure estimates assumed that all consumed fish is contaminated with LMG. The calculated MoEs were 4,000,000 and 400,000 respectively for average and high exposure estimates...
Application of the margin of exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic - example: 1-methylcyclopropene and its impurities (1-chloro-2-methylpropene and 3-chloro-2-methylpropene)Andrew Renwick
University of Southampton, UK
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S81-8. 2010..No human exposure data are available and theoretical estimates had to be used to calculate the MoE. The MoEs ranged from 40,000 to 100,000,000 depending on the assumptions used in the exposure estimation...
Application of the margin-of-exposure (MoE) approach to substances in food that are genotoxic and carcinogenic e.g.: benzo[a]pyrene and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsDiane Benford
Food Standards Agency, UK
Food Chem Toxicol 48:S42-8. 2010..An average dietary exposure estimates of 0.008 microg BaP/kg-bw/day was identified from the range of national estimates. The calculated MoE was 15,000...
Foodborne viruses: an emerging problemMarion Koopmans
National Institute of Public Health and the Environment RIVM, Antonie van Leeuwenhoeklaan, 9, NL 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands
Int J Food Microbiol 90:23-41. 2004....
