Research Topics
| Frederick VerbruggenSummaryAffiliation: Ghent University Country: Belgium Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
The interaction between stop signal inhibition and distractor interference in the flanker and Stroop taskFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Acta Psychol (Amst) 116:21-37. 2004....
Long-term aftereffects of response inhibition: memory retrieval, task goals, and cognitive controlFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34:1229-35. 2008..On the basis of these findings, the authors concluded that cognitive control can rely on both memory retrieval and executive processes...- After-effects of goal shifting and response inhibition: a comparison of the stop-change and dual-task paradigmsFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 61:1151-9. 2008.... 
Automatic and controlled response inhibition: associative learning in the go/no-go and stop-signal paradigmsFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203
J Exp Psychol Gen 137:649-72. 2008..Thus, the results suggest that the two paradigms are not equivalent because they allow different kinds of response inhibition...- Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigmFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35:835-54. 2009..Furthermore, the results show that subjects can make proactive response-strategy adjustments on a trial-by-trial basis, suggesting a flexible cognitive system that can proactively adjust itself in changing environments... - STOP-IT: Windows executable software for the stop-signal paradigmFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA
Behav Res Methods 40:479-83. 2008..STOP-IT and ANALYZE-IT are completely based on free software, are distributed under the GNU General Public License, and are available at the personal Web sites of the first two authors or at expsy.ugent.be/tscope/stop.html... - Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigmFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
Trends Cogn Sci 12:418-24. 2008.... - Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigmsFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33:647-61. 2009..We present evidence that favors the independent horse-race model but also some evidence that challenges the model. We end with a discussion of recent models that elaborate the role of a stop process in inhibiting a response... - How to stop and change a response: the role of goal activation in multitaskingFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34:1212-28. 2008.... - Automaticity of cognitive control: goal priming in response-inhibition paradigmsFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 35:1381-8. 2009..Stop performance was slower for GO than for ### or STOP. These findings suggest that task goals can be primed and that response inhibition and executive control can be influenced by automatic processing... - Short-term aftereffects of response inhibition: repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments?Frederick Verbruggen
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34:413-26. 2008..Based on these results, we suggest that the aftereffects of successful response inhibition are primarily due to repetition priming, although there was evidence for between-trial control adjustments when inhibition failed... - Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch costFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 33:342-56. 2007..This suggests that advance task preparation is not as restricted in nature as previously assumed... - Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter?Frederick Verbruggen
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium
Exp Psychol 52:125-30. 2005..This result suggests that response inhibition and the inhibition processes in cued task-switching are not relying upon a common mechanism... - Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibitionFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Acta Psychol (Amst) 120:307-26. 2005..These findings are in favor of the hypothesis that response inhibition in the stop signal task and interference control in conflict tasks rely on similar mechanisms... - The effect of interference in the early processing stages on response inhibition in the stop signal taskFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 59:190-203. 2006..Results of both experiments suggest that response inhibition and interference at the early processing stages interact... - Selective stopping in task switching: The role of response selection and response executionFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium
Exp Psychol 53:48-57. 2006..These results provide direct evidence for the distinct role of response selection in cued task switching and suggest that response execution is not a necessary factor to obtain a switch cost... - On the difference between response inhibition and negative priming: evidence from simple and selective stoppingFrederick Verbruggen
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
Psychol Res 69:262-71. 2005..The results of both experiments show that response inhibition is not influenced by negative priming, and that negative priming is only affected after a successful general stop... - Stimulus- and response-conflict-induced cognitive control in the flanker taskFrederick Verbruggen
Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Psychon Bull Rev 13:328-33. 2006..The response congruency effect did not vary as a function of previous congruency. These findings are discussed in relation to the distinction between conflict detection and conflict regulation... - The phonological loop in task alternation and task repetitionBaptist Liefooghe
Department of Experiemental Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium
Memory 13:550-60. 2005..Experiment 3 ruled out the involvement of the visuo-spatial sketchpad and more general coordination demands during dual tasking... - Top-down and bottom-up sequential modulations of congruency effectsWim Notebaert
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Psychon Bull Rev 13:112-7. 2006..Bottom-up modulation is observed for both RSIs. This finding demonstrates that two different sources simultaneously reduce congruency effects after incongruent trials... - Voluntary task switching under load: contribution of top-down and bottom-up factors in goal-directed behaviorJelle Demanet
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Psychon Bull Rev 17:387-93. 2010..The theoretical implications of these findings are discussed within the interplay between top-down and bottom-up control that underlies the voluntary selection of tasks... - Investigating the role of conflict resolution in memory updating by means of the one-back choice RT taskArnaud Szmalec
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
Psychol Res 73:390-406. 2009..In the "General discussion", the theoretical relevance of these findings for the concept of updating is discussed... - Stimulus ambiguity elicits response conflictArnaud Szmalec
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B 9000 Ghent, Belgium
Neurosci Lett 435:158-62. 2008..These results show that response conflict is also present in a regular choice RT task which is traditionally not considered to be a measure of cognitive conflict... - A chain-retrieval model for voluntary task switchingAndre Vandierendonck
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B 9000 Gent, Belgium
Cogn Psychol 65:241-83. 2012..Implications for our understanding of voluntary task selection and broader theoretical implications are discussed... - Having a goal to stop action is associated with advance control of specific motor representationsMichael P Claffey
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
Neuropsychologia 48:541-8. 2010..This shows that having a goal of what response may need to be stopped in the future consists in applying advance control onto a specific motor representation... - Intact associative learning in patients with schizophrenia: evidence from a Go/NoGo paradigmAustin A Woolard
Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University, 1601 23rd Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37212 3133, USA
Schizophr Res 122:131-5. 2010..In the present study, we investigated the effect of associative learning during a Go/NoGo task in healthy controls subjects and patients with schizophrenia... - The role of the right presupplementary motor area in stopping action: two studies with event-related transcranial magnetic stimulationWeidong Cai
Department of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
J Neurophysiol 108:380-9. 2012..Future studies are required to establish whether this was due to stimulation of the right preSMA itself or because of remote effects on the wider stopping network... - Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals dissociable mechanisms for global versus selective corticomotor suppression underlying the stopping of actionD S Adnan Majid
Department of Psychology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
Cereb Cortex 22:363-71. 2012..We predict that different fronto-basal-ganglia pathways underpin these different suppression mechanisms... - Responding with restraint: what are the neurocognitive mechanisms?Sara Jahfari
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA92023, USA
J Cogn Neurosci 22:1479-92. 2010..These results further our understanding of how people respond with restraint by pointing to proactive recruitment of a neurocognitive mechanism heretofore associated with outright stopping... - Control of interference during working memory updatingArnaud Szmalec
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Henri Dunantlaan 2, B 9000 Ghent, Belgium
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 37:137-51. 2011..The implications of these findings for the construct validity of the n-back task, for the control processes involved in working memory updating, and for the concept of executive control more generally are discussed... - Task switching: interplay of reconfiguration and interference controlAndre Vandierendonck
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Psychol Bull 136:601-26. 2010..The role of several aspects of the task set, including task variations, task-set overlap, and task-set structure, is addressed, as is the role of knowledge about probability of task changes and about the structure of task sequences... - Inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappingsDarryl W Schneider
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 61:1629-40. 2008..These findings confirm predictions that link n - 2 repetition costs to inhibition of irrelevant category-response mappings... - Stimulating deep cortical structures with the batwing coil: how to determine the intensity for transcranial magnetic stimulation using coil-cortex distanceWeidong Cai
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093 0109, USA
J Neurosci Methods 204:238-41. 2012..This is the first study to demonstrate the effects of coil-cortical distance on stimulation efficiency via a monophasic system using a batwing coil... - Stop the presses: dissociating a selective from a global mechanism for stoppingAdam R Aron
Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Dr, La Jolla, CA 92103 0109, USA
Psychol Sci 19:1146-53. 2008..We suggest that the selective mechanism is used when people maintain the goal of controlling particular responses, whereas the global mechanism is used when it is essential to stop quickly... - Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS windows platformMichael Stevens
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Behav Res Methods 38:280-6. 2006..ugent.be/tscope. An integrated development environment for compiling and running Tscope programs is also freely available... - Valence, arousal, and cognitive control: a voluntary task-switching studyJelle Demanet
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium
Front Psychol 2:336. 2011..In addition, positive valence only affected global performance but not task-switching performance, possibly by phasic modulations of dopamine that stimulates the general ability to perform in a multitasking environment... - Increasing the difficulty of response selection does not increase the switch costBaptist Liefooghe
Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
Can J Exp Psychol 63:323-7. 2009..The authors conclude that response selection does not contribute to the switch cost on the current trial, which provides further support for the idea that basic task processes and task-switch processes are separate...