Research Topics
| Claire GlentonSummaryAffiliation: SINTEF Health Research Country: Norway Publications
|
Detail Information
Publications
What about N? A methodological study of sample-size reporting in focus group studiesBenedicte Carlsen
Uni Rokkan Centre, Nygårdsgt 5, N 5015 Bergen, Norway
BMC Med Res Methodol 11:26. 2011..Our objectives were firstly, to describe the current status of sample size in focus group studies reported in health journals. Secondly, to assess whether and how researchers explain the number of focus groups they carry out...
The female community health volunteer programme in Nepal: decision makers' perceptions of volunteerism, payment and other incentivesClaire Glenton
Department of Global Health and Welfare, SINTEF Society and Technology, P O Box 124 Blindern, Oslo 0314, Norway
Soc Sci Med 70:1920-7. 2010..Instead, programmes should ensure that the context-specific expectations of community health workers, programme managers, and policy makers are in alignment if low attrition and high performance are to be achieved...
Presenting the results of Cochrane Systematic Reviews to a consumer audience: a qualitative studyClaire Glenton
Norwegian Branch of the Nordic Cochrane Centre, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway
Med Decis Making 30:566-77. 2010..To develop and obtain feedback about a summary format for Cochrane reviews that is accessible to a consumer audience, without oversimplification or incorrect presentation...
'Communicate to vaccinate' (COMMVAC). building evidence for improving communication about childhood vaccinations in low- and middle-income countries: protocol for a programme of researchSimon Lewin
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Olavs plass N 0130 Oslo, Norway
Implement Sci 6:125. 2011..The aim of this project is to build research knowledge and capacity to use evidence-based strategies for improving communication about childhood vaccinations with parents and communities in LMICs...
Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key informationSarah E Rosenbaum
Department of Communication, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway
J Clin Epidemiol 63:620-6. 2010..To measure the effects of a summary-of-findings (SoF) table on user satisfaction, understanding, and time spent finding key results in a Cochrane review...
Evidence summaries tailored to health policy-makers in low- and middle-income countriesSarah E Rosenbaum
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Boks, St Olavs Plass, Oslo, Norway
Bull World Health Organ 89:54-61. 2011..To describe how the SUPPORT collaboration developed a short summary format for presenting the results of systematic reviews to policy-makers in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)...
Still too little qualitative research to shed light on results from reviews of effectiveness trials: A case study of a Cochrane review on the use of lay health workersClaire Glenton
Department of Global Health and Welfare, SINTEF Society and Technology, Oslo, Norway
Implement Sci 6:53. 2011..In a Cochrane review on the effects of using lay health workers on maternal and child health and infectious disease control, we identified 82 trials. These trials showed promising benefits but results were heterogeneous...
Lay health workers in primary and community health care for maternal and child health and the management of infectious diseasesSimon Lewin
Preventive and International Health Care Unit, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Box 7004 St Olavsplass, Oslo, Norway, N 0130
Cochrane Database Syst Rev 3:CD004015. 2010..For other health issues, evidence is insufficient to draw conclusions about the effects of LHWs...
User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful Summary of Findings tables for Cochrane reviewsSarah E Rosenbaum
Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, St Olavs Plass, Oslo, Norway
J Clin Epidemiol 63:607-19. 2010..To develop a Summary of Findings (SoF) table for use in Cochrane reviews that is understandable and useful for health professionals, acceptable to Cochrane Collaboration stakeholders, and feasible to implement...
