Research Topics
| Michelle E KhoSummaryAffiliation: McMaster University Country: Canada Publications
| Collaborators
|
Detail Information
Publications
Process description and evaluation of Canadian Physical Activity Guidelines developmentMark S Tremblay
Healthy Active Living and Obesity Research Group HALO, Children s Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, 401 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8L1 Canada
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 7:42. 2010..abstract:..
Safety Climate Survey: reliability of results from a multicenter ICU surveyM E Kho
McMaster University, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Qual Saf Health Care 14:273-8. 2005..It is important to understand the clinical properties of instruments used to measure patient safety before they are used in the setting of an intensive care unit (ICU)...
Riding the knowledge translation roundabout: lessons learned from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research Summer Institute in knowledge translationMichelle E Kho
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Implement Sci 4:33. 2009..There is science and the application of science, and these two are linked as the fruit is to the tree.' - Louis Pasteur, 1871 (from presentation by Ian Graham, 2008 CIHR Knowledge Translation Summer Institute)...
The climate of patient safety in a Canadian intensive care unitMichelle E Kho
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
J Crit Care 24:469.e7-13. 2009..We assessed multidisciplinary team members' perspectives of patient safety climate in a 15-bed, closed medical-surgical intensive care unit through a self-administered questionnaire...
Written informed consent and selection bias in observational studies using medical records: systematic reviewMichelle E Kho
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8S 4L8
BMJ 338:b866. 2009..To determine whether informed consent introduces selection bias in prospective observational studies using data from medical records, and consent rates for such studies...
Interrater reliability of APACHE II scores for medical-surgical intensive care patients: a prospective blinded studyMichelle E Kho
Health Research Methodology Program, at McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Am J Crit Care 16:378-83. 2007..Despite widespread use of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), its interrater reliability has not been well studied...
Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvementMelissa C Brouwers
McMaster University, Program in Evidence based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, ON, Canada
CMAJ 182:1045-52. 2010..We tested a new seven-point scale, evaluated the usefulness of the original items in the instrument, investigated evidence to support shorter, tailored versions of the tool, and identified areas for improvement...
The Global Rating Scale complements the AGREE II in advancing the quality of practice guidelinesMelissa C Brouwers
McMaster University, Department of Oncology, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada Program in Evidence based Care, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
J Clin Epidemiol 65:526-34. 2012..To explore the role of a four-item Global Rating Scale (GRS) that could be used in place of the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II)...
Quality of reporting of surveys in critical care journals: a methodologic reviewMark Duffett
Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Crit Care Med 40:441-9. 2012..Adequate reporting is needed to judge methodologic quality and assess the risk of bias of surveys. The objective of this study is to describe the methodology and quality of reporting of surveys published in five critical care journals...
Hypotonic versus isotonic saline in hospitalised children: a systematic reviewK Choong
Department of Paediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Arch Dis Child 91:828-35. 2006..v.) maintenance fluids are the solutions of choice in paediatric patients have not been rigorously tested in clinical trials, and may not be appropriate for all children...
Consent in critical care trials: a survey of Canadian research ethics boards and critical care researchersMark Duffett
McMaster Children s Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
J Crit Care 26:533.e11-22. 2011..We compared the attitudes and beliefs of Canadian research ethics boards (REBs) and intensive care unit researchers toward the use of various consent models for a low-risk randomized controlled trial...
Recruitment of multiple stakeholders to health services research: lessons from the front linesMichelle E Kho
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Henderson Site, 60 G Wing, 2nd Floor, 711 Concession Street, Hamilton, ON L8V 1C3, Canada
BMC Health Serv Res 10:123. 2010....
The Completeness of Reporting (CORE) index identifies important deficiencies in observational study conference abstractsMichelle E Kho
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
J Clin Epidemiol 61:1241-9. 2008..The aim was to develop, test, and apply an index to assess the completeness of reporting in a cohort of observational studies of conference abstracts...
Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support applicationMelissa C Brouwers
McMaster University, Cancer Care Ontario, Hamilton, Ont, Canada
CMAJ 182:E472-8. 2010..We established a program of research to improve the development, reporting and evaluation of practice guidelines. We assessed the construct validity of the items and user's manual in the beta version of the AGREE II...
Comparison of referring and final pathology for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the National Comprehensive Cancer NetworkAnn S LaCasce
Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA
J Clin Oncol 26:5107-12. 2008..We sought to estimate the impact of expert review in the modern era by comparing final pathologic diagnoses at five comprehensive cancer centers with diagnoses assigned at referring centers...
